72°
forecast

New asthma inhalers look the same but will cost you more

Posted to: Health News

The new generation of asthma inhalers are environmentally friendly and as effective as the older generation that used ozone-harming ingredients.

But there's a catch. The new inhalers cost roughly $30 to $50 in local pharmacies. The older style, which are increasingly hard to find, cost about $15.

Because the Earth-friendly inhalers are relatively new, there is no generic alternative for them, leaving insured patients with much higher copayments and the uninsured footing the whole bill.

"It has a significant impact," said Dr. Cynthia Kelly, director of the pediatric allergy and immunology department at Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters in Norfolk.

Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, disproportionately affects the poor. Nearly 15 percent of Virginians who have incomes of $15,000 or less have asthma, compared with 6 percent of those with incomes of more than $75,000, according to the state health department.

Most people with asthma are on "other medications as well," Kelly said. "They're already incurring significant costs."

Someone with moderate to severe asthma would typically go through six to eight such "rescue" inhalers in a year, said Kelly, who is co-director of Allies Against Asthma, a regional advocacy group for asthma patients based at Eastern Virginia Medical School.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration's regulation will ban the sale of the old-style inhalers because they contain chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs, as a propellant. Commonly used in aerosols, CFCs have been linked to depleting the ozone layer, reducing protection against the sun's ultraviolet radiation. Most manufacturers stopped using them in products long ago, but until recently, an exception has been made for asthma inhalers.

The CFC-inhaler ban doesn't officially go into effect until Jan. 1, 2009, but most pharmaceutical manufacturers have stopped producing them, said Betsy Stoller, a spokeswoman for the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America.

"We're in support of the transition" to hydrofluoroalkane, or HFA, inhalers, Stoller said. The problem has been that "patients were not aware the transition was occurring."

Stoller said doctors will write prescriptions for the new inhalers without telling their patients about the change. She said the complaints the foundation has heard have been not so much about the price, but about how the inhalers work. While they're just as effective clinically, "it does feel different and some patients say it feels weak."

Public awareness efforts about the transition are under way, including an American Lung Association public service announcement airing nationally in which the new inhalers trounce the "polluting inhalers of yesterday" in a professional wrestling match.

But CFC inhalers easily beat HFA inhalers on cost. The new inhalers enjoy patent protections, which mean their manufacturers have an exclusive right to make them and set prices. Typically, once patent protections run out, generic drug producers start making competing products and prices come down.

Kelly said there are prescription assistance programs for people who qualify and some companies are offering coupons for a free sample, "but that's only for one inhaler."

Kelly said her patients are finding it harder to locate CFC inhalers.

"They often call back when they can't get the old alternative," Kelly said. "They have to do their shopping around."

Pharmacist Lawrence Barlow said he is "down to one company that still makes" CFC inhalers, but he has been able to meet the demand of his customers. Barlow owns the independent Irwin's Pharmacy in Chesapeake. "The old ones are less expensive, and people are still asking for them," he said.

Customers who have insurance that covers the cost of HFA inhalers have generally made the transition, he added.

In anticipation of the change, Norfolk-based Optima Health Insurance Co. moved one of the HFA inhalers to its "preferred" brand-name drug tier that requires a copay of $20 to $30 rather than the $50 or more for drugs on higher tiers, said Deno Sebastian, director of pharmacy for the insurer. Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Virginia also has the new inhalers on their "preferred" brand tier, said spokesman Scott Golden.

The new inhalers probably will have to be made generically before they can move to the least expensive tier of drug co-pays - typically $5 or $10, depending on the insurance plan. Current HFA inhalers most likely won't lose patent protection until the next decade.

Generic status doesn't affect just insurance copayments; out-of-pocket-costs for the uninsured also are much lower. Kelly said the new inhalers' cost may prompt some patients to decide to try to do without them, putting them at risk when they have an asthma attack, which, in turn, can lead to more costly emergency room visits.

"I'm sure they're out there," Kelly said. "They don't necessarily let their doctor know that."

Nancy Young, (757) 446-2947, nancy.young@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Indeed...

It seems to me someone here stands to make some money off of this situation. You know, someone who has responded multiple times defending the company making these new inhalers, monopolizing the industry and possibly murdering several less-than-affluent asthmatics over the next decade.... just_a_more_realistic_opinion

ignorance is indeed bliss

Ignorance of the fact that changing delivery systems cost the manufacturers money. Hard to comprehend? OK, try: Old machines that produce old delivery system cant be used. New machines for new delivery system must be purchased (or old ones retrofitted). This costs the manufacturer money. The manufacturer must raise the cost of the product to cover the cost of meeting the new regulation. These are not charities, they are businesses.

The cost of any product is affected by the cost of producing that product. It's really not that difficult a concept.

...just my opinion...

Ignorance is bliss I guess

I love those who are defending "big pharma" and the profits that they make. Has the medicine changed? Not really, just the delivery. And not significantly. It ranks right up there with the U.S. Postal Service raising the price of stamps and spending tons on advertising. It just makes one's brain hurt sometimes...

Was this a significant problem to begin with?

I can't imagine that the volume of CFC's coming from asthma inhalers was sufficient to be a threat to the ozone layer.

When people are paying all those extra bucks for their medicine, I hope they will take the time to remember that the added cost is the fault of the inflexible zealots of the environmental movement and not the drug manufacturers.

In Depth Reporting

I wonder if the reporter thought to ask questions about how much it cost the pharmaceutical companies to get rid of the obsolete equipment and replace it with new equipment and processes.

Maybe Nancy thinks that the pharma companies make so much money that they can absorb the cost of manufacturing the asthma med with a new (govt mandated) delivery system. (OOPS! So much for govt supporting big pharma!)

Hard hitting journalism.

...just my opinion...

Help the Little Person

Wow, I can see it now, $300.00 for a inhaler. Yes that is correct. I use inhalers and thankfully being retired military they are covered. If you have no clue how it feels to be unable to breath just get someone you can trust and put a big garbage bag over your head for 20 minutes. Feel the heat and stale air you get. Gasp a few times. Get the feeling? Most pulmonary problems are a direct result of our environments be it at work or home or outside. Cigarette, cigar, pipe, dope smoker, yes they all cause lung problems. See that person with the oxygen bottle? This could me you. Your turn, explain to the children why they need this to live. Same as a Diabetic needs insulin. Our government needs to set a price and help these research companies financially and bring us cures for COPD, Asthma, Diabetes and many others.

The problem is not with profits

The problem is with EXCESSIVE profits, most to the point of keeping healthcare and, as in this case, even prevention out of reach for most people. I guess "justmyopinion" is probably not asthmatic or is a wealthy asthmatic. Inhalers are necessary. People with severe asthma cannot live without them. Not only are the new inhalers extremely pricey, the old, less expensive ones are being banned 10 years before generics of the new ones are allowed to be produced. This is creating a monopoly to rip off people who need inhalers. The ban should not have been allowed AT LEAST until more affordable options were available to the people who need them.

here they come...

"Government helps big pharma rip us off."
"Big pharma doesn't care about us, only profits."
"Big pharma shouldn't be allowed to make a profit."
"Government should make sure I get my meds for free."
etc....

If the pharmacuetical industry is not permitted to make a profit, how are we going to get our meds? What incentive will they have to research new drugs? Get real, folks...why do you think we have all these drugs?

...just my opinion...

Another rip-off

I have had asthma most of my life so I know how to use an inhaler. The last time I checked, I INHALE the medicine, NOT shoot it out into the atmosphere. Unless I don't know something and I am farting the CFC's back into the air, this is just another ploy to charge more money for something that won't make a difference!

the real shame of it

the real shame of it, is that there was absolutely NOTHING wrong with the "old" inhaler-- as a matter of fact, I personally think it is better, because the "new" inhaler requires better technique on the part of the user to get the full effect-- because the new one does not have the rate of airflow that the old one had, from the greater positive pressure output-- not to mention the fact that ALL insurance companies now process the new inhalers as a "brand only" version, meaning that patients are charged with the highest copay on their plans-- this is causing greater health care costs, all in the name of "global warming paranoia"-- asthma inhalers, cow farting, etc DOES NOT CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING, or a reduction of upper atmospheric ozone, for that matter-- yet another health-care and economic-impact debacle, compliments of the federal government!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Health rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


Find a HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Doctor or facility name, keyword: i.e., optometrist, dental, home health care
City, State or Zip: i.e., Norfolk, VA or 23510