Woman with home full of ferrets says she was running shelter

Posted to: News Virginia Beach

Video: Hundreds of small animals found.
Brian Clark | HamptonRoads.tv


The ferrets, including the one above, were taken from the home by Virginia Beach Animal Control. (L. Todd Spencer | The Virginian-Pilot)



VIRGINIA BEACH

The woman whose home, barn and garage were crammed with more than 200 ferrets and carcasses said Wednesday that she was running a ferret rescue shelter that got out of control.

Authorities on Wednesday charged Elaine Carole McCraig of the 200 block of North Lynnhaven Road with a single count of animal cruelty after they removed more than 100 ferrets and nearly an equal number of dead animals from her property the day before.

McCraig, director of Ferret Rescue of Tidewater Inc., said she got sick - developing diabetes, severe tendonitis and heart problems - about a year ago and had fallen behind with her animal care.

"The biggest mistake I've made is that I haven't asked my friends for help," she said in a telephone interview.

"I hated to call anyone else. I was sure I was going to feel better."

McCraig, 59, said she had already quit taking in some of the animals and had been planning to put some of them up for adoption.

She said she was not a ferret breeder and hadn't hurt any of the animals.

Authorities reported that they found 92 frozen carcasses on her property.

McCraig, who said she quit her job as a veterinarian technician and nurse to care for ferrets, explained that people brought their dead pets to her to be cremated. She said she stored them in freezers because they are cheaper to cremate if she takes them in bulk.

National ferret caregivers from as far away as Nevada came to McCraig's defense Wednesday.

Vickie McKimmey, director of shows and special events for the American Ferret Association Inc., a Maryland-based association, said she knew McCraig as someone who took in ferrets that local shelters wouldn't accept.

"She spent thousands and thousands and thousands of her own dollars to care for these old and sick animals that folks so freely dumped," Mc-Kimmey wrote in an e-mail.

Ferrets are high-maintenance animals, and people who get them don't realize how much care they require, said Teresa Lamarche, community outreach director of the Virginia Beach Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, which has 21 of the ferrets removed from McCraig's property up for adoption.

The Beach SPCA normally does not accept ferrets, Lamarche said.

Penny Hendrix, president of the Ferret Association, said that owners quickly discover there are few places willing to take their unwanted animals.

Ferrets can't be released into the wild, she said, because they are domestic animals and most will die within a week if turned loose.

Caregivers sometimes get overwhelmed once they start accepting the animals, she said.

"The biggest problem with home-based ferret shelters is that the shelter moms and dads are human," she wrote in an e-mail. "In reality, they are all only one illness, family crisis or accident away from becoming a headline."

Authorities found more than 100 ferrets, a dog, a bird and three cats on McCraig's property. Most of the animals were suffering from dehydration

and malnutrition, police said.

Carcasses of a rat, cat, otter and 89 ferrets were found in freezers.

Sixty-one of the rescued ferrets had to be euthanized because of their poor health, authorities said, and more than 15 are in Animal Control custody.

There is no limit to the number of ferrets someone is permitted to own in Virginia Beach, but they have to be properly maintained, police said.

 

Jennifer Jiggetts, (757) 222-5104, jennifer.jiggetts@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules. Comments do not reflect the views or approval of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language. Due to high volume, comments might not appear immediately on the site. We reserve the right to reject any comment for any reason. Readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment to alert an editor. Repeat offenders will be denied automatic posting privileges.

jimmyf- I'm sure that you

jimmyf- I'm sure that you think that what Vick did was a horrible thing, but come on hundreds of animls in one house thats the nasties thing that I have ever heard of. Also will she have to pay for the care of the animals that survived? Because again Vick did!

TIMO is RIGHT!

You're right thisismyopinion-Vick should have received a different sentence like maybe 23 YEARS because of who he is.

I wonder if I can get her to

I wonder if I can get her to take care of my backyard neighbor's barking dogs :)

23 Months

ONE COUNT OF ANIMAL CRUELTY!! If you abuse 200 animals you get one count of animal cruelty. But if you fight dogs you get 23 months in prison. HUH! WOW! That makes sense. Double standards is a horrible thing. If you are middle class white you get one count, but if you are rich black you get numerous counts. Race really does make a difference!

When Animal Control Steps In

It is sad that they get to decide who lives and who dies. If most of them were dehydrated, then wouldn't a little water, some vitamins and a nice warm bath do the trick? And another thing, many animal control facilities make it almost as difficult to adopt a pet as it does a person. You've got to live in the same state, you have to bring all members of the family, you have to bring all pets, you have to show vet records of the other pets, you can only put an animal on hold to get all this together in three days, etc. I'll bet if they tone down their "control" they won't have to kill as many.

Ever notice how many animals die when animal control steps in.

Funny thing,these animal 'welfare' and animal control groups kill most of the animals they take from someone who has worked to help them and has kept less than perfect animals alive. Then the person who took responsibility gets charged with a crime,while they go on unchallenged in their 'moral authority'(like PETA after dumping murdered animals in a dumpster). If the killing of the less than perfect is their first priority,they aren't assisting with the problem,they are the problem.In this case,the situation did get out of control due to illness,but if your choice is to keep quiet and struggle to help or call in the animal control goon squad to kill the less than perfect animals,you start to feel like you're in Germany in the 1930's(or dealing with PETA in the present century).This wasn't animal cruelty,it was a hard choice by someone put in a bad situation by an inept,ignorant,unresponsive,unhelpful city agency.Your high taxes at work,I guess.

Ferrets

I appreciate that she was trying to do something good, but anyone who truly cared about animals would put them first. There is no excuse for allowing them to go without food and water. Unfortunately, she just strengthens PETAs belief that animals are better off dead than in the hands of people who are questionable care givers.

Otter?

Well someone "Otter" know how she got it... ;-)

Otter?

Do tell...

Otter

I wish someone would ask her about the otter. I am really curious about how she got it.

ferrets

WOW!! Now we have a poll an rather or nor Virginian's should be allowed to have ferrets in Va. I sure hope that the people voting are at least eduacated about ferrets before they vote. Some of you people commenting, I wonder if you own pets at all. Shame on anyone who turns in an animal because it is sick or you don't want the upkeep anymore. Special cirrcumstances are understandable, but to be irresponsible and uncaring is sad. Get your facts beforehand people, THAT GOES FOR JUDGING PEOPLE TOO!!


More Stories Like This

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox