69°
forecast

Despite pleas by Tech families, Va. panel rejects gun bill

Posted to: News State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Tearful parents of students murdered and wounded at the Virginia Tech shooting rampage in the spring were rebuffed Friday in their efforts to broaden laws requiring Virginians to undergo police background checks before buying guns.

State law now orders licensed gun vendors to conduct the checks on potential buyers to weed out illegal sales to felons and mentally ill people. However, one-on-one sales between citizens are allowed without the check.

Republicans controlling the House Militia, Police and Public Safety Committee voted in bloc against legislation that would bar private sales at gun shows.

Tech parents said private sales make it possible for troubled people such as Seung-Hui Cho to acquire guns. Cho, a Tech student with a history of psychological problems, killed 32 classmates and faculty members in April and wounded 17 before committing suicide.

“Please don’t say these innocent lives were lost,” said Lori Haas of Richmond, whose daughter Emily survived two shots in her head, speaking to the committee. “They weren’t lost; they were killed by a sick person who should not have had that gun. Every one of you sitting here today can prevent someone else from suffering this anguish.”

Republicans on the panel and gun rights lobbyists voiced sympathy for the victims but said the Tech parents’ efforts are misdirected. Cho did not buy the two pistols he used at Tech at guns shows. He bought one from a pawnbroker, the other online, and passed background checks both times.

“Gun shows are not part of what happened there,” said Philip Van Cleave, president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, who accused gun control advocates of using the Tech tragedy to advance their cause. “Some of those who are not in favor of guns saw this as an opportunity to open up the toy box.”

The defeat of HB745 signals the likely death of all attempts in the General Assembly to end one-on-one sales – an effort supported by Gov. Timothy M. Kaine.

A similar bill, SB109, is scheduled to be heard Monday in the Senate Courts of Justice Committee. Proponents hope the measure will receive favorable treatment in the Senate, which is narrowly controlled by Democrats. But even if the measure passes the Senate, it would wind up back in the hands of the House Militia, Police and Public Safety Committee.

The legislation died on a 13-9 vote in the House committee on Friday, with all Republican members voting to defeat the measure and all Democrats voting to pass it.

For the past eight years, the 22-member House panel has been nicknamed “The Killing Fields” because of its record of defeating gun control measures. The last two Republican speakers have stocked the committee with members who have pro-gun voting records.

Of the entire 140-member General Assembly, only 10 legislators received an “A+” rating from the National Rifle Association last fall for their pro-gun voting records. Eight of those lawmakers are on the Militia Committee. An additional eight members of the panel received “A” grades from the NRA.

Three parents of Tech victims attended the hearing. The patron of the House bill – Del. Chuck Caputo, D-Fairfax – said more wanted to come, but he was unable to organize a larger turnout because GOP leaders waited until 4 p.m. Thursday to tell him his bill would be considered the next morning.

Republicans on the panel rejected Caputo’s request to delay the hearing for a week so more Tech parents could attend. The committee chairwoman – Del. Beverly Sherwood, R-Winchester – said the panel had a pressing agenda in coming weeks.

Republicans said they support efforts this year to improve mental health care in Virginia and to better identify on background checks people like Cho, who was ordered by a judge in 2005 to receive psychiatric counseling.

“We still have plenty of opportunities this winter to deal with the real problems behind the Tech tragedy,” said Del. Scott Lingamfelter, R-Prince William.

Warren Fiske, (804) 697-1565, warren.fiske@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

A well regulated militia

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state." What does this part of the 2nd amendment mean? Does it mean that these citizens who bear arms should be registered so that they could be called up to defend the country if needed? It seems to me that that the first part of the 2nd amendment is totally ignored by the NRA and their followers. Will one of you gun toting cowboys explain what this means. Everyone in the state of Israel can carry a gun because it is necessary in case of attack by their neighbor states. Is it possible that the founding fathers felt it was necessary to have a well regulated militia because the country could not afford a standing army.

I guess there is more than one way to skin a cat

I did not think much of the original story but it seems that the residents got what they wanted. I wonder if having the "New York Times" picking up the story had anything to do with it.

delete the above

It was supposed to go for another story

voting rights

Only registered voters can vote and in the process they have to state their name and address. If someone else has this information it is only one fraudulent vote that cannot be repeated in that election. IN order to change an election outcome it would take thousand of these so called fraudulent votes. Leave the system the way it is. It works and every citizen face the same voting rules. You must be a citizen, (You must prove that to register) and you live in the voting district. The act of proving you are a citizen is done at the time of registration. Maybe the ones that want this voter prohibition would like to go back to the founding fathers and only allow land owners to vote.

Tim Kaine must think we are dumb

How ridiculous is it to attempt to use the parents of Cho's victims to get a law passed that had no relation to the circumstances leading to the Tech killings? And now he is trying to get a bill passed barring checks that a rape accuser is telling the truth before some boy's life is ruined as in the Duke case. Wake up Virginia. Stop allowing our sneaky governor to play to your emotions in his effort for greater government control over our lives.

Per "rrc1943"

"...all that was proposed is that there be some way to ensure that the buyer is someone who can be trusted to use a gun responsibly." You must mean the same checks in place that completely missed the notes about a court labeled dangerous psychopath like Cho right? Because I mean those checks worked out really great for Virginia Tech and all.

Per "Airport Bum"

"So what if trying to plug this loophole is not related to Cho's purchase of the gun he used to kill 32 people. It is still a loophole that needs to be plugged. It doesn't have to be related to the Virginia Tech shootings in order to be a flaw in the law that needs to be corrected." I'm sorry... I thought they were trying to cash in on the Tech killings by using the families of those kids to drum up support for this bill. I guess I did not see those family members being used by the state giving flowery speeches about closing a loophole that had nothing to do with their children dying after all. I clearly must have been mistaken.

Gun Show

I will ditto Pierre on this one.

This is rediculious...

I am glad the house was smart enough to reject this bill. They should also overturn outlawing guns on college campuses. I mean seriously, if that whack job was not the only one with a gun on campus do you really think that he would have killed that many people? If we had LESS gun laws I strongly believe the incident would have never left the dorm and only two people would be killed, the crazy one and the first girl he shot. Really why should I not have the right to protect myself on campus? As for loopholes, he would have gotten a gun anyways so why even make the law? Gun laws are for law abiding citizens.

Money, as usual, speaks in the General Assembly

Once again, the NRA has shown that it owns the General Assembly. For politicians, common sense is always secondary to lining their pockets with "campaign contributions," or, more accurately, bribes. Arguments that 2nd Amendment rights were threatened by the proposed legislation are disingenuous. No one is being prevented from buying a gun; all that was proposed is that there be some way to ensure that the buyer is someone who can be trusted to use a gun responsibly. What do those who oppose this legislation have to fear? Are they trying to hide something?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners