70°
forecast

Norfolk's best-case scenario: an $18.6 million shortfall

Posted to: News Norfolk

NORFOLK

The City Council was warned Tuesday that for the first time in recent years, rising gas prices and other costs coupled with the real estate decline threaten to blow a hole in next year's budget.

An $18.6 million hole - and that number will probably grow.

Based on economic forecasts, if the city does not give employees raises, start new programs or fund new projects, it will need to find another $18.6 million beginning July 1 to balance the budget, Assistant City Manager Marcus Jones said.

However, City Manager Regina V.K. Williams said that no raises and no new programs is unrealistic. By law, the city must approve a balanced budget in May.

"It's like starting a football game 18 points down," Vice Mayor Anthony L. Burfoot said.

Jones said tax revenues are not increasing as fast as anticipated and fixed costs are rising more quickly than in recent years. For instance, annual payments on long-term projects financed by debt will increase by $17 million, to $88.5 million, on July 1.

Mayor Paul Fraim said he is concerned the numbers will get worse if the economy continues to decline. "We're going to have to stay very flexible and very watchful," he said.

Burfoot said the council "created this situation" last year by reducing the real estate tax by 16 cents, to $1.11 of $100 of assessed value, while continuing to spend money on big projects.

The tax-rate reduction cost the city about $25 million in revenue. The city continued with projects such as a $49 million convention center, a $7.5 million makeover of Town Point Park and a courthouse complex expected to cost more than $100 million.

"I knew with the deep cut we made last year, we were going to be in some trouble," Burfoot said.

Norfolk Tea Party 2, a residents group that led the effort to reduce real estate taxes last year, is expected to call for another reduction this year.

The council was told that, beginning July 1, assessments for residents and businesses will increase about 3 percent, but those assessments will be based on sales figures ending last July 1.

Councilman Barclay C. Winn said housing prices are falling in Norfolk but won't be reflected in assessments for 18 months.

"I believe some people are going to be assessed for more than their homes are worth, and that's not right," he said.

Councilman W. Randy Wright, who helped form Tea Party 2, said the numbers he heard do not concern him yet. "I'm glad we're getting an early opportunity to absorb this," he said. "But about 10 years ago, we had to close a $22 million budget deficit and in real dollars. That was a lot more than we're dealing with now.

"We did it without raising revenues, gave raises and ran the city. We're just going to have the sharpen the pencils and tighten the belt."

Williams said she will present her budget to the council on April 8. The council will hold two public hearings and three work sessions before voting on the budget May 13.

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

$22 million ahead...

since the granby towers is a thing of the past....the city is $22 million dollards ahead....maybe the mayor and his gang can give some more $ away....who is going 2 pay 2 fill up the hole where the granby towers was going 2 be built???

Hold on to your wallets

The TAX AND SPEND city council is not going to control there spending until we send them a message at the polls. Anyone who thinks that they will change there ways by going to city council meetings and complaining are sadly mistaken. These power brokers are only tamed when removed from office. They know how short the memories of the voters are and how careless the voters are with there vote. We must remove every last one of them when they come up for re-election. Not one can be left standing or they will not get the message. We also must remove all in every following election until we get the respect that we the people have a right to. As Patrick Henry said "Give me liberty or give me death" That includes the liberty to spend my money as I see fit!!!

Thank Goodness the elections are coming -

May '08 we can ditch hester and winn. May 2010 the rest can be ousted.
The arrogance of these people. Remember last year we had a surplus and rather than hold unto it - it was divied up amoung them to use on their pet projects. I believe Hester started a private loan business with her share. And one would think that with all the new businesses opening around here there would be more income, new WALMART on Tidewater, new restaurants everywhere, something is not adding up and it's city council.
my time in Norfolk is coming to a close and i am re-locating - no where nnear Norfolk. I've had my fill.

Shortfall

This is no more than a "Positioning Strategy" that the city administration does every year. Cry poverty and then give in a little.

It's worked for years. It's time for a change in city leadership.

The city has placed a bet that they lost

Downtown has indeed superseded the rest of the city and so much has been spent that this shortfall will have a crippling effect. The recession is here and this is a fiscal problem. You would have thought that we would make sure the basics were taken care before putting ourselves in a hole from pet projects in this city's case, for politicians personal pocketing. I don't disagree with complaints from readers about assessment because it was a bunk way to raise revenue for the city.However; this did not need to occur had the council not spent us into this situation. TAKE CARE OF THE PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES AND LET ECONIMIC DEVELOPMENT COME AS IT WILL FROM THE PRIVATE SECTOR; THAT IS THE FIRST BRANCH OF CITY ADMINISTRATION TO SIMPLY REMOVE;LOOSE IT AND ALL OF THE GREASING THAT TAKES PLACE WITH IT (it cost us dearly.) Then get back to the priorities; police, fire, public schools and roads.Stop killing private industry and prodding development past the need

Here is an idea....

Instead of blowing $25 million of taxpayer money on a silly little choo-choo, why not spend the money wisely and do what you were elected to do. Run the city, not finance usless and doomed projects. Don't ride the tide of failure.

Let me get this straight...

It's "unrealistic" for the city to have no raises or new programs in the upcoming budget, but apparently perfectly okay to have assessments go up an average of 3% in the face of the current real estate market?

At a minimum, the tax rate needs to be reduced by .03/.04 to offset the assessment increase. Is it "unrealistic" to shoot for .99?

I hope voters in Norfolk are paying attention here.

"Burfoot said the council "created this situation" last year by reducing the real estate tax by 16 cents, to $1.11 of $100 of assessed value, while continuing to spend money on big projects." I don't know what world Burfoot is living in, but if a house is not worth the assessed value or if the tax is going to start forcing people out of their houses, then it's too high. Further, in my house if the cost of necessities goes up but the income stays the same, then the extra little nice to have but not neccessary things go away. That's what council people need to learn, to live within the income! If they can't then it's time for them to be replaced. If they have the mind set that $1M is not huge, then they are complacent and need to come back to the real world.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox