Vital Dulles rail jumps the tracks

Posted to: Editorials Opinion




VIRGINIA IS well-positioned to tough out this year's financial turbulence because it possesses two critical gateways to the global economy: Dulles International Airport and the Port of Virginia, here in Hampton Roads.

If either of those gateways gets blocked, the economic pain will spread across the entire commonwealth. That's why every Virginian should be concerned at the stunning and surprising blow federal officials dealt last week to plans for passenger rail service to Dulles.

After 40 years of planning and $140 million in federal investments, leaders at the Federal Transit Administration said Thursday they intend to cut off $900 million for the project, about one-fifth of the price tag.

Extending the subway to Dulles is no bridge-to-nowhere. Twenty-five million people pass through the immense airport every year, many of them on their way to and from 40 international destinations. With more than 379,500 takeoffs and landings in 2006, it ranks as the 28th-busiest airport in the world. Dulles generates an estimated $11 billion in business.

But congestion is choking a global hub that drives the commonwealth's economy with high-income jobs and high-dollar commercial properties.

If state and federal leaders permit the flow of commerce in and out of Dulles to falter, the economic repercussions will echo in every municipal budget in Virginia.

After giving the project green lights for so many years, it is hard to find a coherent rationale for the Bush administration decision.

Federal transit officials, in rejecting the project, rehashed old issues, including the growing cost and the ability of the airport authority to manage the construction. State officials were led to believe those concerns had been resolved when Virginia cut $250 million from the extension's first phase last year and the FTA's regional staff signaled acceptance of the management plans.

The speed with which private equity investors have parachuted in with offers to make up the $900 million gap naturally raises suspicions.

In recent years, a revolving door has been spinning between the Bush administration and companies eager to turn the project into a for-profit enterprise, one that would push tolls skyward and place a valuable public rail service in private hands. The highest profile example is John Flaherty, former chief of staff at the U.S. Department of Transportation and now a principal at The Carlyle Group, the first company to signal its interest in the rail initiative.

That reshuffling has generated distrust made more tricky by political intrigue. Northern Virginia tipped last year's election in favor of U.S. Sen. Jim Webb, who in turn helped tip the Senate in favor of Democrats. That may not be the primary motivator of federal transportation officials in the Dulles debacle, but old grudges are making it harder for both sides to focus on the merits of the project.

State leaders rightly feel blindsided, and they have yet to receive satisfactory answers to their questions about why federal officials have made such an abrupt about-face. FTA Administrator James Simpson owes the commonwealth a better explanation and a second look at this crucial economic project.

 



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment to alert an editor. Update on new comment functions.

private investors welcome here,,, c'mon down!

Those private investors are welcome to come down and take over the light rail.

Oh, the Horror!

Ooooh, after only 40 years of planning and doing nothing by the airport commission, private investors are going to step in and actually build a passenger rail system serving Dulles. And they're going to do it at a profit instead of expecting the taxpayers to subsidize it forever. Scandalous.

We must act quickly to prevent that from happening, otherwise a cancer of financially viable passenger rail systems might spread across the country, connecting places where people are to where they actually want to go instead of where the Master Planners want business and development to flourish.

Worse still, the success of this venture might make proper government run rail systems look foolish and wasteful, leading to rail systems being built only where they are economically viable. What terrors will these capitalists visit upon us next?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Editorials Stories

More Opinion Stories

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox