RICHMOND - The Senate narrowly rejected a bill Wednesday that would have added specifics about contraception to public school curriculum.
The bill – SB 155, sponsored by Sen. Donald McEachin, D-Henrico – called for adding lessons about various birth control methods approved by the Food and Drug Administration. The instruction would accompany what students have been learning in school since the legislature approved “family life education” in 1987: the value of abstinence and benefits of teenage parents putting unplanned children up for adoption.
The bill cleared the Senate’s education and health committee on a 9-6 vote, but died on the floor after falling three votes shy, 17-22.
The vote split largely along party lies, with Democratic senators Charles Colgan, Edd Houck and Phillip Puckett joining with the Republican minority to kill the bill.
Sen. Mark Obenshain, R-Harrisonburg, said during the session Wednesday he was disturbed by the list of contraception measures approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Some, like spermicidal foam, are effective only 50 percent of the time, he said.
“This list is rather staggering in terms of its scope, and the relative effectiveness or ineffectiveness,” Obenshain said
Sen. Mary Margaret Whipple, D-Fairfax, urged passage.
“I would just like to ask the members of this body to think back about what kind of sex education you had in high school. I could tell some stories,” said Whipple, a grandmother of five. “I think giving our children, young people, accurate information is important.”
Whipple reminded her colleagues that parents are already allowed to pull their children out of family life education classes if they believe it isn’t appropriate or conflicts with religious beliefs.
Sen. George Barker, D-Fairfax, said he’s been involved in teen pregnancy prevention efforts for decades.
“Knowledge is a tremendously powerful thing,” Barker said. After Northern Virginia began requiring family life education in schools, Barker said, teen pregnancy went down 50 percent, and teen abortion rates fell 60 percent. “Providing information to our teens does have substantially positive effect,” he said.
Sen. Edd Houck, D-Spotsylvania, said he worried about Catholic students in public schools.
“This was one of those efforts where the intent was right, but it could get in the way of families’ beliefs,” Houck said.






Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

HAH
1) I bet they could teach the politicians a lot about sex to begin with. and 2) If you want a program that works 100% make them watch my son everyday for a week... They'll NEVER want kids...
Say no kiddies
Take the young female teenagers on a field trip to the department of social services, social security office and any other entitlement program office aimed at single unwed teenage mothers to show them the single teenage mother's there, with 2 screaming brats, who dropped out of school and say this can be you if you get pregnant.
Wrong....
Family life programs have no more success than abstinence only programs. Sorry to burst anyones bubble but that is the plain documented truth. We don't need to teach children how to have sex, we need to teach the obvious ramifications of having sex and why to wait. I don't have a problem teaching and providing graphic representation of STD symptoms and effects. I don't have a problem impressing upon young girls that "WE" are not pregnant, YOU are. I have no problem telling young girls that baby daddy is not cool and any potential baby daddy is just an immature punk out to get some. I also don't have a problem beating the snot out of some punk that thinks that girls are for his pimpin'. This liberal enabling train of thought has to end.
big problem
"This was one of those efforts where the intent was right, but it could get in the way of families' beliefs," The problem here is that a few families' beliefs are keeping our state's children from learning about contraception and preventing STDs. Abstinence only programs have proven to be unsuccessful. The same number of students will start having sex around the same time regardless of which program is used but only the "Family Life" students will be taught about condoms and the dangers of STDs. The other group, who is also sexually active, will simply learn that they are "wrong" to be sexually active before marriage.