64°
forecast

Norfolk-based Cole ordered to Lebanese coast

Posted to: Military

Amid rising tensions, an apparently deadlocked political situation and with growing impatience for Syria, the Bush administration has ordered the Navy to send the Norfolk-based guided-missile destroyer Cole and two support ships to the Lebanese coast.

"The presence is important," Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Pentagon reporters Thursday. "It isn't meant to send any stronger signals than that; but in fact it does signal that we're engaged, we're going to be in the vicinity."

Mullen said the decision was not aimed only at Syria but at the region as whole.

"It's a group of ships that will operate in the vicinity for a while and as the ships in our Navy do," Mullen said.

The Cole left Malta on Tuesday to head to Lebanon. But it won't be dropping anchor along Lebanon's beaches. Rather, it will hold well off shore and likely out of sight.

Lebanon's governing coalition, which is supported by the U.S. and its western allies, has been unable to strike an accord with the Syrian- and Iranian-backed Lebanese opposition.

Underlining the stalled political situation in Lebanon, presidential elections that were to have been held this week have been delayed for a 15th time and are now slated for March 11.

The U.S. blames Syria for the impasse, saying the Damascus government has never given up its ambitions to control its smaller neighbor.

National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe told the Associated Press that the deployment is meant as a show of support for regional stability. He added that President Bush is concerned about the situation in Lebanon.

The Cole was attacked and nearly sunk off the coast of Aden, Yemen in October 2000 by al Qaeda militants with the loss of 17 sailors. It was repaired and back on duty in April 2002 and went on its first deployment in November 2003.

The Cole could be backed up or replaced by other warships being sent to the area. One is the amphibious assault ship Nassau, based at the Little Creek Naval Amphibious Base in Norfolk, which is en route to the Mediterranean on a normally-scheduled deployment with five other warships.

Some or all of them might operate in the eastern Mediterranean also, the Pentagon said.

The ships of the Nassau Expeditionary Strike Group deployed last week for maritime security operations in the Mediterranean and the Middle East.

The other ships with Nassau are the dock landing ship Ashland, also based at Little Creek, the Norfolk-based destroyers Ross and Bulkeley and the cruiser Philippine Sea, based in Mayport, Fla., as well as the Norfolk-based attack submarine Albany.

Lebanon has been embroiled in a power struggle since the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri. His death has been blamed on Syria which was forced after the killing to withdraw its forces from Lebanon, where they had been stationed since the 1970s.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Personal to Steve Stone

You wrote "The Cole was attacked and nearly sunk off the coast of Aden, Yemen in October 2000 by al Qaeda militants with the loss of 17 sailors.".
Please do a little research before you write about the COLE, so you can get the story straight, please.
YES, COLE was attacked.
YES, it happened in October 2000 (11:18 a.m. Yemen time, on the 12th, in case you didn't know).
YES, it was by al-Qaeda COWARDS.
YES, we did lose 17 Sailors that day.
HOWEVER, COLE was NOT "...nearly sunk off the coast...". We were moored (tied up to a fueling pier - called a "dolphin") in the harbor in Aden Yemen.

The forgotten men and women.

It amazes me at how any time ships and deployments are mentioned the men and women of Military Sealift Command are hardly ever mentioned. I understand that these men and women are civilians and can quit whenever they wish but the majority of these men and women are proud of what they do and endure many more deployments than active duty ships. This without the stand down periods after deployment and the long periods between deployments that active duty ships receive.

Lebanon/Syria

Once again we're sticking our nose where it doesn't belong! Is the US sending the ships or is the UN? If it’s the UN then I have no problem. If it's the US - why the heck are we getting involved in something that obviously isn't important enough for the UN to get involved? Why do we ALWAYS have to play Big Brother? Hasn't the government learned that these other countries don't want us just coming in? Another thought... We're against Lebanon when it comes to their "border incursions" into Palestine, and from what I've read Syria was a supporter of getting rid of Hussein. Now we're against Syria and for the Lebanese? "We thank you for your support with Iraq but now we're going to bomb you if you don't stop." "We're going to bomb you back to the Stone Age if you don't leave Palestine alone but now we're here for ya if Syria bothers you." It makes no sense at all! It's no wonder we're the biggest and the most powerful but also the most hated.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features