Richard Quinn
The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
As Andrew Goddard sat by his son's bedside at a hospital near Blacksburg on April 16, he prayed.
If Colin survived after being shot four times by a fellow Virginia Tech student who had failed to receive mental health treatment, Goddard vowed to dedicate himself to making sure no other father would have to live his nightmare.
Nearly a year later, as the first General Assembly session after the Virginia Tech shootings winds down, Goddard - whose son survived his injuries - has spent a lot of time at the Capitol.
"I honestly thought they would be looking for things to do, based on the recommendations of the Virginia Tech panel," Goddard said.
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine appointed the Virginia Tech Review Panel to investigate the shootings. The panel made 21 findings and 70 recommendations - many related to mental health reform and campus safety.
In response to the nation's worst campus tragedy, Virginia legislators embraced the first significant overhaul in the state's mental health system in many years but did little to change gun laws in the commonwealth.
The mental health bills address shortcomings in the system highlighted by Seung-Hui Cho, who fatally shot 32 people at Virginia Tech before killing himself. Two years before the slayings, a court ordered Cho to receive outpatient treatment after he was judged a danger to himself. He did not receive the treatment.
"This was by far the largest and most expensive and most challenging of all the recommendations that were made," Kaine said. "They're systemic, they're statewide, and they really cost."
The overhaul also resonated deeply with the Tech victim s' families, Kaine said.
"This was the issue the families felt strongest about,"
Kaine said. "This was the one we had to do."
"We knew from the beginning that they were going to address mental health" and other noncontroversial issues such as privacy laws and campus security, said Lu Ann McNabb, a friend of the family of Reema Samaha, who was killed by Cho.
She and Goddard said they were both pleased with progress made during the session in those areas.
Gun control, however, was another matter.
"Guns, we felt, were very controversial, so that's why we focused on that," she said.
McNabb and Goddard, who attended many General Assembly meetings and hearings this year, tracked the progress of about 60 bills.
Gun legislation this session ranged from efforts to close the so-called "gun show loophole" to efforts to make sure concealed-weapon-permit holders could bring their handguns onto public college and university campuses.
Both McNabb and Goddard were disappointed that efforts to change the gun-show law failed.
The Virginia Tech panel had recommended changing the law, so people buying firearms from private dealers at gun shows would have to undergo background checks.
Del. Brian Moran, D-Alexandria, said the push to make that change never gained enough momentum.
"It failed on a party-line vote, and that's unfortunate," he said.
But opponents to the legislation had pointed out that Cho did not buy the two handguns used in the attack at a gun show.
House Majority Leader Morgan Griffith, R-Salem, who opposed changing the gun laws, said lawmakers addressed areas that applied directly to what happened in Blacksburg.
"There wasn't anything related to our gun laws that would have affected Virginia Tech," Griffith said. "Where the system might have made a difference was mental health, was security, not acquisition of firearms."
Griffith said he knew many people were passionate about gun control after the tragedy, but he felt their argument wasn't valid.
"You had people who truly believed in their hearts there was a connection," Griffith said. "Step back and you can see there is no connection."
Other lawmakers believe permitting guns on campus would make colleges and universities safer. Del. C. Todd Gilbert, R-Shenandoah, said the recent rash of incidents on college campuses demonstrates that responsible gun owners should have the right to carry concealed weapons on college campuses to protect themselves.
He sponsored legislation in 2006 and again this session that would have prohibited a state entity such as a public university from banning someone carrying a firearm if he or she had a valid concealed-handgun permit.
Del. Bob Marshall, R-Prince William, introduced a bill to allow full-time faculty with concealed-weapon permits to take their handguns onto campus at public universities and colleges in Virginia.
Both proposals were left in a House committee.
Gilbert, who also sponsored the mental health reform legislation, said he doesn't think schools have the right to ban firearms on campus.
"I have never said 'I told you so' about what happened at Virginia Tech," Gilbert said. "I never said if students and professors could carry on campus it would have made a difference."
Going forward, McNabb and Goddard said they plan to continue educating the public about Virginia's gun laws and will return to the General Assembly next year.
Goddard plans to keep lobbying for gun control and additional mental health legislation.
"There's a lot of unfinished work that still needs to be looked at," Goddard said.
Jen McCaffery, (757) 446-2627, jen.mccaffery@pilotonline.com
Richard Quinn, (757) 222-5119, richard.quinn@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

It's has been worse
For anyone who thinks the founding fathers could not ever imagine that we could be in the mess we are in; remember the mess they were in and had to use weapons to win their freedom. The weapons of their day were just as inovative to them as ours are to us now. I don't think that they ever imagined a country that had it so good that it could forget how it won it's independence in the first place. WE ARE IN A War!!! If, God forbid, we ever do have to pick up arms and defend our homeland once again (it's already happened, duh) we better be ready. Otherwise, I will still enjoy shooting at paper targets and wasting money on ammo.
Mental Health and Gun Control
I addressed the Mental Health Issue below. Perhaps you didn't read it. If you want to see how Thelma Drakes votes or any other elected official you can sign up for it through Congress.org. This is not the first bill on Mental Health that "the most wonderful Drake" (barf) has voted NO on. And YOU accuse other of "junping"?!?!?!?! Get real!
Jumping again?
Its very easy to jump to the conclusion that Rep Drake did a bad thing when we know nothing about the bill. There are always reasons why someone would vote no on a bill. Perhaps there were certain negative aspects of the bill that would be more bad then good if it were passed? Perhaps it was filled with pork barrel politics?
Someone else didnt just "mention" mental health. If you read the article, it was also about mental health.
Since Mental Health was brought up
Since mental health was brought up by another poster it's worth mentioning that Thelma Drake just voted NO on "Mental health and Addiction Equity Act". Shame on her!
This forum will not change opinions or establish any type of law regardless of any view or "debate".
Still unconvinced
I wasn't asking anyone to justify anything. It was an honest attempt to see if there were a different angle I was missing. Unlike a lot of people, I maintain an open mind and can be persuaded by logical arguments. If you want your apparent goal of increased gun control ever to become a reality, people who believe as I do will need to be convinced of the merits of your argument. It's called debate. And 'whatever,' it's too bad you are incapable of offering reasoned arguments to your point of view. All you do is use inflammatory language such as "weapon worship" and you demean those with whom you disagree, calling them "GunNuts," "gun zealots" and "'Cold War' philosophers." I have to admit you lost me on that last one. See, during the Cold War we were worried about a nuclear attack from the Soviet Union. Incidentally, "thinkers and true men ... of responsibility" I think describes the Founding Fathers very well. You know, the guys who enshrined our right to keep and bear arms.
History
I think most people believe the world is too civilized to have guns in it. Having spent some time in other countries and seen the corruption that has taken over it scares me to think that the same thing might be possible here. But I know that due to human nature that is possible. And if it were to happen I would be more than willing to give me life in defending the freedom I now enjoy so that my children would not have to live in the same type of environment that I have seen in other countries. These countries have goverments who kill journalists who try to print the truth. Bribes are a way of life. Property can be taken without payment by someone who has a judge in their back pocket. To get ahead in life you must be like all of the other corrupt people who are in power.
We have, to a lot lesser degree, areas that are like that in America. When they are exposed they are taken care of, but if most of the goverment were to become corrupt they never would get exposed.
To this could not happen in America is naive.
There are also a lot of countries that hate us. China hates us and is quickly becoming a world power. They are building up their army to levels they
Register all firearms = a tiny step forward
IMO the answer to the question of whether mandatory gun registration will help eliminate gun violence.... is of course NO.
It will take tremendous effort and an epic, if not impossible change in our society to reverse the twisted effects of years and years of weapon worship in America. Wishing on a star or praying for miracles will not resolve our violence problems but if we keep with the GunNut philosophy of simply doing nothing or worse yet, arming ourselves even more, is simply lunacy.
The "Cold War" philosophers and gun zealots will never stop. The thinkers and true men and women of responsibility must prevail.
Mental Health and Gun Control
When it comes to the lack of gun control mental health is a major problem. Some people register guns, and there are guns you can buy that don't require any permit. Life happens and lives change even to those who have registered a gun, have a permit for one, and at the time were law abiding citizens. The mental stability of an individual can rapidly change under some circumstances. Do I think ALL guns should be registered? Yes! Do I think ALL guns should require a permit? Yes! Should such registrations and permits be updated? Absolutely yes! Do I think there should be a database for ALL guns? Absolutely yes! As we know the right to bear arms is legal, but does the owner still have a legal right to own one? With a national database, names can be added and pulled as circumstances change. Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean I have an obligation to justify my thoughts, feelings or opinions. Please understand that should I not respond to your questions.
Help
I now open my question up to the floor. Would an advocate of registering all firearms please explain what effect it would have on gun violence? I ask this question in a sincere attempt to open dialog, to understand an opposing point of view. I don't personally see how registration would reduce crime, but maybe there's something I'm overlooking. Thanks.
Trust no one?
So because you feel that the author appears to have an agenda that his facts can not be trusted? If this is so, then logic would dictate that anyone with an agenda is completely and totally unbelievable. Hence, not only can I not be trusted, but you also can not be trusted, or this newspaper, or the television.. I research. I have not found contradictory evidence that disproves Dr. Halbrook’s research. I believe what he wrote is credible.
I never once claimed that a single theory such as the well armed militia was the sole reason Germany did not invade. I simply concurred that it was a strong influence in the overall picture.
This brings me back full circle to once again stating that we are focusing on one aspect and missing the big picture. I wish people were as passionate about mental health as they are about guns. Mental health is the problem.