78°
forecast

General Assembly approves audit of SPSA

Posted to: News State Government Virginia

State lawmakers in Richmond this week voted unanimously for an independent audit of the finances and operations of SPSA, the regional waste authority plagued in recent years by debts, lawsuits and controversy.

Under a resolution passed by the Senate on Tuesday and the House on Wednesday, the state auditor of public accounts will conduct the review of SPSA’s internal workings and also compare them to how other trash authorities and private garbage companies do business.

The audit team will spend nearly a year on the effort, poring through documents and spreadsheets and conducting interviews. The auditors must report their findings, along with any recommendations for improvements, to the General Assembly by January.

“We’ll be asking things like, 'Why did you do this or that?’ and 'Why did you enter this particular contract?’ and 'What can you do about it now?’ Stuff like that,” said Walter J. Kucharski, who heads the Auditor of Public Accounts office, a state agency.

“We’ll be looking at the numbers and finances, of course,” he added. “But we’re also looking at performance – what’s worked and what hasn’t.”

Two local legislators – state Sen. Fred Quayle, R-Suffolk, and state Del. John Cosgrove, R-Chesapeake – sponsored the audit bill.

Cosgrove had wanted a deeper, tougher inquiry of the Southeastern Public Service Authority, an agency he said has lacked sufficient oversight for years. But those attempts were voted down or blocked this year and last.

So Cosgrove and Quayle jointly introduced their compromise bill for a state audit this year, which has sailed through the Legislature.

“I don’t need to tell you about the many questions and concerns we’ve received about SPSA,” Quayle said Thursday. “We’re asking for a good hard look at how they’re operating. And I’m confident that if they’re not operating correctly, we’ll find out what’s wrong and do something about it.”

John Hadfield, SPSA’s executive director, who is retiring in August and will not be in office when the audit is completed, said the waste agency supports the Cosgrove-Quayle resolution.

SPSA, Hadfield said in an e-mail Thursday, “has worked with the APA on routine audits in the past and we look forward to working with the APA in this capacity.”

SPSA was launched in the 1970s to handle most garbage and recycling in eight counties and cities in South Hampton Roads.

It has amassed about $250 million in debts since then in building a regional waste system, but member communities began to get nervous last year over how and when that money will be repaid.

In response, SPSA imposed the highest disposal fees in the state – $100 per ton of garbage – to help restore financial stability, offered early-retirement buyouts to employees and cut operational costs by 7 percent.

At the same time, the agency was sued by the city of Chesapeake, which sought to leave SPSA early, citing lost confidence in management and policy.

Also last year, an unpopular deal fell through to bring New York City trash to Portsmouth for incineration, and SPSA executives were found to be spending generously on trips, meals and other business expenses while decrying their financial crisis.

Kucharski, with the Auditor of Public Accounts, said his office has experience with analyzing waste authorities.

More recently, though, the office has reviewed the conditions inside the Virginia Department of Transportation and spending problems at the state Game and Inland Fisheries Department, and is now helping to sort through the state’s $2 billion computer-network contracts.

“There’s always too much for us to do,” Kucharski said.

 

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

About These Comments

While an audit may be due, Mr Barrett has actually been the most accessible person I've ever heard of, to the general public's questions, for a man in his position. It would seem to me , that he doesn't have to answer to anything at all in this forum, but, chooses to do so regardless of possibly being at the receiving end of a large dose of criticism. Apparently he can dish it out as well as he can take it. I know I'm probably not the role model of good manners, but, you have to admire that. lol

Thank You Mike

Mike - thank you for your constant support and leadership. Our region's AWARD WINNING - Nationally recognized solid waste authority: SPSA is something Hampton Roads should be proud of - and its great leadership from folks like you, Hadfield, Blow, and past leaders like Curling and Phillips! It is people like little Scottie Harper, and the editors and paper that support him, that have me baffled. How can one little man get away with the silly stories - and ridiculous attention to this fine agency? What did SPSA ever do to him? He continues to spread rumors which only have scared employees - changed the ENTIRE dynamics of a great organization by his microscopic eye on everything SPSA does...SPSA - wasting taxpayers money? If you think that - I implore you to go over to their headquarters - middle of the work day and see that while the few employees left working in the dark to save energy, no celebrations of employee’s good work, no enthusiasm and little comradery - BECAUSE OF LITTLE MEN LIKE SCOTTIE H!!! Bad Scottie...bad paper for not investigating his story and bad paper for claiming it holds integrity as a high value. Integrity does not have the public in an uproar over fals

Lunacy?

Mr Barrett is like a small child during a temper tantrum. When he doesn't get his was he belittles other views. SPSA has been run in the ground by people like him.

Oh, that's classic. The ash

Oh, that's classic. The ash plant? That is kind of like sending the Seaman Recruit to find the mail buoy. Can you tell me where the ash plant was supposed to be located? I guess when people get their only news from the pages of the Pilot they are loaded for bear and reason, deliberation, and knowledge goes out the window. Once you have become inflamed by another headline in the Pilot, you are loaded for bear and you are never going to be deterred. Anger begets lunacy, and on this Friday afternoon as ther day winds down, I am going to simply enjoy your comment about the ash plant all weekend, and if for some reason I start to take myself too seriously, I will get a great kick out of that comment. You all, have a nice weekend as well.

You know...

You know that the GA could pass legislation to allow the municipalities to vote to create the Hampton Roads Trash Authority (HRTA)… Then the HRTA could pass a tax on to all of us to build a third incinerator, etc…etc…etc....

Nope, that won’t work, the Va Supreme Court would rule later that unconstitutional…

Just adding it all up in my head....

Ash Plant

You forgot to mention the ash plant that was built and never used at the cost of millions. Don't look in your mailbox for any SPSA leadership or efficiency wards.

Well of course, I do not

Well of course, I do not admit anything of the sort. I agree that from the day I was appointed to be the respresentative from Virginia Beach, I worked on behalf of the city council to change the method of financing short term obligations with long term debt, and issue that I had repeatedly criticized the SPSA board for enacting. However, as perhaps you are unaware, each member jurisdiction has but one vote, and I will acknowledge that while we were concerned about this practice, other members were quite content to continue to borrow in this fashion and to enjoy the lower municipal tip fees paid by their jurisdictions as a result of this practice. Finally, other jurisdictions became aware that this practice was not sustainable, and eventually the practice was changed, new more prudent fiscal policies were adopted, and the cities/counties agreed to higher tip fees to ensure that all debt is paid off by the end of the contract period.

Hey Mike, How long have you been on the board?

Mikebarrett said "I certainly agree that past business practices were unsustainable, and fortunately, those practices have been changed, new sustainable policies adopted, and the members have placed the organization on a stable financial footing." So mike, you agree that you and the other board members are the one's that have abused the SPSA funds and ran it in to high debts. Now the very people that ran up the debt and miss-used the funds are saying they are on 'stable financial footing". I can't help but wonder if the board members and Hadfield run their household finances the way they handle the SPSA money. You're a fine example of why there should be TERM-LIMITS on all elected and appointed positions. One of the other posters commented about seeing SPSA people up in NOVA SCOTIA partying at some convention. Was the board and Hadfield there mikey? Hopefully we'll see a very nice audit with some indictments to follow.

ok

so it was "someone else's fault". How about an opinion...stupidity or criminal??

Interesting perspective. I

Interesting perspective. I certainly agree that past business practices were unsustainable, and fortunately, those practices have been changed, new sustainable policies adopted, and the members have placed the organization on a stable financial footing. But as to the future, the chief administrative officers of the member jurisdictions have embarked upon an objective analysis of the options for the members in regard to future solid waste management activities. The SPSA board welcomes this analysis which should result in charting a path for the future of the regional entity as well. Of course, the irrational condemnation of debt on these pages ignores the reality that solid waste disposal is an industrial function, and the cost of a landfill, a refuse derived fuel plant, a waste to energy plant, and a fleet of tractors and trailors,was expensive from the very beginning and debt was essential to create a going concern. It was the postponing and elongation of the debt service that I was most concerned about, but a correction has been adopted.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners