High-tech submarine uses old-fashioned navigation

Posted to: Military


Video: Old-fashioned navigation.
Kate Wiltrout | The Virginian-Pilot


New subs like the North Carolina still rely on basic technology: Tug boats nudge them out to sea, and navigators use pencil and paper to plot the course. (Kate Wiltrout | The Virginian-Pilot)



ABOARD THE NORTH CAROLINA

It cost more than $2.5 billion, is powered by a nuclear reactor and has sonar systems so advanced they can detect the snapping sound of shrimp.

But for all its hundreds of computers and automated systems, the Navy's newest submarine still relies on three old-fashioned things when navigating the deep: people, pencils and paper.

At least for now.

On a recent overnight cruise - the North Carolina's first since leaving the Newport News shipyard in February - Chief Petty Officer Shawn Mason stood in front of a paper chart spread across a console in the submarine's control room.

Colored markers indicated the contours of the sea floor; longitude and latitude readings adorned the side of the 3-foot-long chart showing the nautical features east of Port Canaveral.

Huddled over the chart in the darkened control room, Mason used what's called a divider - similar to a compass students use to draw circles - to measure small increments of longitude and latitude. With nothing more advanced than a pencil and a straight edge, the chief drew a line projecting the submarine's course on this overnight trip in Florida's warm coastal waters.

Mason used dead reckoning - "DR," in control room lingo - to figure out precisely where the submarine was at the moment, and where it was headed if it stayed on course.

That would be easy, except for all the precautions a sub takes when it's transiting on the surface.

When Lt. Anderson Perez, the navigator, called out an adjustment to steer the sub away from a boat, Mason flipped over his pencil and erased the line.

From there, it was back to Square One, with the divider, the pencil and the ruler.

Mason is among the last generation of military mariners who will rely on paper charts to ply the ocean.

The Navy has begun equipping submarines with a computerized program called VMS, or voyage management system. The program will do with microprocessors what Mason does by hand, allowing navigators to spend less time estimating where they are and more figuring out what's ahead.

The switch, which began last year on the Norfolk-based submarine Oklahoma City, will redefine one of the most basic tasks of mariners for centuries: determining, or "fixing," a ship's position using various environmental clues.

Mason looks forward to the change. According to Capt. Mark Davis, the commanding officer, it will probably happen in 18 months to two years.

Mason insists he won't be nervous relying on a computer. Submariners aren't much for nostalgia; their very survival depends on technology.

"I love VMS. I'm a big VMS fan," said Mason, who has served aboard three other submarines in his 12 years in the Navy. "I will be glad to get rid of paper."

In 2005, the Cape St. George, a Norfolk-based cruiser, was the first surface ship to be certified in electronic navigation. Eventually, the Navy plans to have all of its 270 ships and subs outfitted with the system.

But submarine navigation is the riskiest of all, simply because sailors are essentially driving blindly. Periscopes are useless underwater; sonar provides a picture - in a way - of nearby obstacles. Piloting a submarine is like driving a car at night with all the windows blackened. Knowing where you are on a map is essential to figuring out when to brake and where you can safely speed up.

Electronic navigation will calculate location by using GPS data and inputs from other navigation sensors. Changes will be reflected in real time on the digital navigation chart, making Mason's eraser expendable.

Cmdr. Terry Takats, the submarine force's top navigator, said VMS makes navigating easier and also simplifies the laborious planning process.

"Voyage planning is a lot simpler and more straightforward in the electronic world than on paper, where a lot of manual effort is involved," Takats said in an interview.

"Electronically, it's a lot simpler. Click, move the cursor, click. It draws a line between the two."

Takats said electronic navigation will increase safety because sailors will take less time figuring out their current position.

"Electronic navigating will allow us to spend more time focusing on where we're going," Takats said.

One example of a navigation nightmare: In 2005, the submarine San Francisco was cruising at top speed when it hit an undersea mountain in the Pacific. The mountain's existence, which had been detected by satellite, wasn't reflected on a paper chart. The crash killed one sailor and injured 60 others, almost half the total crew.

Physically, there are other advantages to electronic charts. Submarines go to sea with thousands of paper charts, which take up precious space.

"You can take these stacks and stacks of hundreds of pieces of paper, and convert all of that to a handful of CDs," Takats said. "You can imagine how that simplifies things."

Davis said planners originally were going to build all Virginia-class subs with VMS. Instead, the fifth boat of the class - now being built in Connecticut - will be the first to leave the shipyard with electronic navigation capabilities.

Five older submarines - Ohio, Florida, Houston, Buffalo, and Oklahoma City - have been retrofitted and are now certified to use VMS.

How realistic is the possibility of the navigation system crashing and imperiling a crew?

"There are risks involved with any transition you do," Takats said. "We are taking effective measures to mitigate the risks. We need it to be highly reliable, highly accurate, and we also need redundancy. We have a backup, and we have a backup to the backup."

For all the digital system's advantages, Mason might be a little sad to see the old way go.

"Right now, this is kind of an art," he said. "People come over here kind of wondering what you're doing and look at you like, 'What are you doing?' And you explain it to them, and they still don't understand it until they stand here for at least a couple hours."

Kate Wiltrout, (757) 446-2629, kate.wiltrout@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment to alert an editor. Update on new comment functions.

VMS

One thing the reporter fails to point out is that the Voyage Management System was on the USS San Francisco when she ran aground ...So much for adding to the safety. Also although Cape St. George was the first ship qualified to use VMS as of today due to system limitations she still is required to maintain paper charts two years after certification. The Voyage Management System Ranks Seventh to The Six other Navigation Softwares that are available but the Navy bought this crap because it was the most expensive and the one that needed the most fixing and maintains job security for a lot of folks. I wouldn't put VMS on a remote controlled boat on a lake

New Sub......Paper Charts.....

I believe the new VMS is a very good idea, BUT in tight situtaions, you'll always need the correct paper chart and the MK One Eyeballs used by the navigation team. I also believe that celestial navigation should be still a part of the USNA's required courses....The practice is still an art as well as a science.......mastering it, you remain in contact with the long line of folks who wore Blue and Gold from ages past.....

GPS?

I'm sorry if I seem ignorant; I only spent 20+ years on the water not under it. If the new VMS system will use as one of its "checks" GPS doesn't that mean that the sub is in some way connecting to a satellite? If so, doesn't that mean it is at least in some small way making itself venerable to location by an enemy that learns a means by which to infiltrate our satellites?

Have a manual back-up!

Back in the early 70's, we were in the initial phases of "getting rid of paper" on our ships. We had all our tactical publications on microfiche so we could "save room." One day the light bulb in the microfiche reader burned out. No spare on board. Lesson learned.

maps are for driving on

maps are for driving on roads, not navigating on water. charts are for water.

Beware of too much reliance on computers.

What's going to happen in the future, when that VMS system is damaged in battle or simply malfunctions? Or the software goes haywire? Answer: a lot young people standing around that won't have the first clue how to plot a position on a map, or lay out a course. Because, like everything else in the Navy that becomes 'automated' the manual skills are quickly forgotten. Just think about the teenagers at the grocery store who can't count change in their head when the computerized register crashes. VMS might be a great 'back-up' to manual plotting, but should never, ever replace it or the requirement to have the knowledge to do it.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Military Stories

More articles from: Military rss feed