68°
forecast

SPSA landfill expansion in jeopardy

Posted to: Environment News

SPSA has a problem.

The waste authority serving much of South Hampton Roads needs to expand its regional landfill in Suffolk to make room for future garbage and is planning to spend $22 million to do so.

But a state environmental law requires that newly built landfills stay at least one mile from drinking water sources. In Suffolk, an apartment complex that draws water from wells sits less than a mile from the expansion site.

"We've hit a roadblock," Richard Cherlias, a manager with the Southeastern Public Service Authority, told his board of directors last week.

On Thursday, SPSA executives argued before the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality that the law should not apply to their project and that a permit should be issued for construction, according to a department spokesman.

The environment department agreed to take the matter under consideration, but SPSA did not sound optimistic afterward.

"I had hoped we would have something to report," SPSA's executive director, John Hadfield, said in a prepared statement Friday, "but we do not."

Hadfield also expressed concern with looming state budget cuts to the environment department, noting that they "could adversely affect the time it takes for permit review and approval."

Other localities have asked state lawmakers for an exemption from the landfill rule, and two have been granted - to Mecklenburg and Halifax counties. But lawmakers already are in session this year. Since the two exemptions were granted, lawmakers have not received other requests warmly.

SPSA declined Friday to spell out its options if the state environment department rejects its arguments. Agency officials promised to provide a report next month to their board of directors.

The stakes are high.

The regional landfill is estimated to run out of storage capacity in 2012. SPSA, as an agency, is due to expire in 2018. So, without more landfill space, the question would become: Where is the more than 1 million tons of trash produced each year in South Hampton Roads supposed to go?

In addition, to win local approval for an expanded landfill, SPSA has pledged to build two new garbage transfer stations in Suffolk, together expected to cost more than $20 million.

Engineers and consultants have been working on the expansion plans for months, though SPSA would not say how much has been spent.

The authority sent the state a notice of intent to seek an environmental permit for an expansion in September.

In its filings since then, SPSA has described how underground wells providing drinking water to a small housing complex were 4,750 feet from the landfill site - about 500 feet closer than the one-mile limit. The application cites the name of the complex as Green Pine Apartments, but the name and location could not be verified.

The rule was enacted to provide residents and the environment additional protection against potential landfill leaks or spills into groundwater supplies, nearby creeks, rivers and reservoirs. Such leaks can include toxic materials.

"We could not recommend approval," Milt Johnston, a state environmental official based in Virginia Beach, said of the SPSA proposal. "The issue, really, is the law. And it really doesn't give much room."

SPSA purchased the 69-acre tract for the landfill project several years ago. Known as Cell VII, the expansion would sit just east of the existing landfill, near the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge. It would hold about 7.4 million tons of household and commercial trash - enough space to last through 2018.

When told of the permitting roadblock last week, board members seemed stunned and confused.

"Don't they know this is an expansion? Do they understand that? That we need this facility?" asked Michael Barrett, who represents Virginia Beach on the eight-member board of directors.

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Put Up or Shut Up

I guess the references to developers and board members can only mean me; I am the only non elected member of the board, and I am a developer. I certainly am willing to discuss past and present decisoins of the board, and candidly admit that I have supported many and opposed many. Those votes on my part are what I am called to do as the representative of the City of Virginia Beach. But in past posts, a poster identified as Rose has made accusations about my participation on the board, and some of the comments could be construed as alleging that I have used my position on the board to benefit family and friends and to provide kickbacks. Frankly, I would not usually feel it necessary to respond to such blatantly irresponsible and ridiculous accusations, but in this case, they were clearly aimed at me. So, produce evidence of your accusations, or frankly, shut up.

The board and Hadfield are the major problem.

SPSAs biggest problems are the board and Hadfield. The abuse of tax dollars in SPSA is huge. Travel, going first class all the way and making so many boondoggles it's ridiculous. Then on the board there are all the leaches that do nothing but suck up every tax dollar they can get their greedy fat little paws on. Some of them (the board members) are better than others at it. They're the ones that are "developers" that make sure their other friends and family in government are taking care of with kickbacks in turn for using tax dollars to subsidize their projects. These board members are a clear example of why we need Term-Limits on all appointed and elected public seats. Hadfield has run SPSA in the ground, yet he continues to get a huge paycheck and huge bonuses from the SPSA board. The members of the board seem to be the very ones that want to pile on tax after tax so while they continue to over grow the area. They won't be happy until this area is competing with Chicago over being the highest tax in the nation. Of course while they leach off our tax dollars, they'll continue to misguide our taxes and fees meant for roads to fund their projects. Get a real job Mike.

Right back at you

SPSA has had this permit for how long and has done how many expansions? Come on, I know the entire history of your permit and SPSA has been around as long as the current regulations and they know all of the permitting standoffs by heart. They even hired the old man away from the city back in the day, because he was your biggest resistance. They knew this day was coming and they just arrogantly marched into DEQ at the last minute and said "you must do this, WE ARE SPSA". Yeahhhhh, ok. Who is not showing concern? Who doesn't care? Of course we need the landfill space and you're the only game in town, but why hasn't SPSA thought ahead and either worked out the permitting problems before now, or found another site? Face it, you're going to run out of space sometime, either now or five years from now if you get to bust the drinking water supply standoff. Don't turn this around on the citizens.

Concern

As a board member, I certainly did express concern that at this late date, we do not have our permit in hand and frankly, it did not appear to me as if the staff was adequately pursuing this permit with all the vigor and resources necessary. Because if we are not able to expand the regional landfill, then South Hampton Roads will be out of disposal capacity in early 2013, and then we will have to contract for disposal capacity, likely at a much higher cost. If that occurs, then the existing municipal tip fee of $100 or so will be a fraction of what cities may need to pay. So obtaining this permit and getting started on landfill expansion is a critical need, not just for SPSA, but for all of our customers. Those who have posted herein seem to care little about the needs of our citizens in the eight member cities who depend upon SPSA for landfill capacity, but that of course does not mean that most citizens, when presented with the facts, will not want to ensure that SPSA can continue to provide landfill space to dispose of municipal waste.

Take the Money and...well there is no need to run now is there?

Is this is yet another example of local government not planning ahead, or is it an illustration of their recurring attitude of lets grab the money today and we will deal with the great unwashed later? It is not likely the masses are paying attention, much less are willing to act in numbers large enough to matter, therefore their chances of being voted out seem minimal. It appears that there was money to be made RIGHT THEN by individuals who had interests in putting those apartments on that site, and the expansion of the landfill was something trivial to be addressed in the vague thing some call “the future”. If it becomes a problem later, it is easy to just get someone to say something like, "Don't they know this is an expansion? Do they understand that? That we need this facility?" Why am I not surprised to learn from the City of Virginia Beach’s website, that Michael Barrett served on the Citizen BRAC Committee as well? ( http://www.vbgov.com/search.aspx ) Trading away the future needs of the many, to serve the immediate needs of the elite, seems to have become a disturbing pattern in Virginia Beach government.

Barrett always seems to be

Barrett always seems to be on the wrong side of things. I wonder why, hmmm.

Barretts comment says it all.

From the article "Don't they know this is an expansion? Do they understand that? That we need this facility? asked Michael Barrett, who represents Virginia Beach on the eight-member board of directors." So let's see, we know that Barrett has no regard or respect for the Virginia State Constitution (he strongly supports taxing without representation), he has no regard for private property owners (wants to invoke eminent domain so developers can steal land to resell), now he shows he has no regard for the health of a whole apartment complex of people. It's all good as long as you're raking in the bucks, isn't it Mike? It's time to start throwing Barrett and all of his mind set out of positions of public trust. Leaches of our tax dollars are costing us our "backwater" way of life and is causing a growth of taxes that we can no longer afford. Developers (such has Barrett) have been able to suck billions out of the taxpayers by being in power of our tax dollars. Our tax dollars have subsidized the majority of their projects which have resulted in overcrowding the land. VOTE-EM-OUT!

It'll happen

They'll get the DEQ Director to sign a unilateral agreement or some other civil document that will waive the requirement. DEQ will do their job and dig their heels in (as they should), but eventually some senators will call the governor and a document will be drafted.

Developer Barrett says - pollute away, who cares about others?

Way to go Mike, once again when confronted by the law you place your desires ahead of the rights of others. As a Developer I guess I can understand it. You support the use of eminent domain to push property owners around. Now you want to pollute the water supply of a apartment complex. Nice. All-appointed Regional government runs amuck - again. SPSA is a mess. But Mike is appointed, so how do we voters fire him? Wew can't. Of course the real problem here was the city government that allowed the apartment complex to be built too close to the site for future expansion. But, guys like Mike are always pro-development. Ironic isn't it?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox