The Virginian-Pilot
©
IT'S EASIER to make your case to a captive audience of 12 jurors than to 140 restless and cranky politicians.
Gov. Tim Kaine, a lawyer by trade, has a style of leadership that relies heavily on an appeal to the intellect of his target audience. He's been methodically building a case for 27 months that Virginia requires a costly fix to its transportation network. Sometimes, his audience responds with a Bronx cheer, as when House Speaker Bill Howell dismissed an hourlong briefing last week on road maintenance needs as "dubious at best."
Although his message hasn't changed, Kaine has gradually altered his delivery. In Year One, the new governor quickly assembled a package of motor vehicle and insurance taxes and lobbed it into the laps of lawmakers, who scattered to the winds. In Year Two, he took a more conciliatory approach toward Republicans, working with them on a compromise plan and leaving fellow Democrats to watch from the sidelines.
With that plan in shambles because of legal problems with its regionally imposed taxes, Kaine has shifted tactics again as he prepares to call lawmakers back for another transportation special session.
"I have just been doing a lot of shuttle diplomacy," he said last week. "My goal has been to do a lot of that discussion without doing anything really visible."
Lawmakers say the below-the-radar approach is more likely to succeed.
"It's a maturation process," said Del. Chris Jones, R-Suffolk. "He's taking a lower profile and is being more strategic."
The governor is weary of constant comparisons to his predecessor. Mark Warner was a professional deal-maker who passed a 2004 tax increase after months of obsessing over strategy details and one-on-one sales pitches to lawmakers for their votes.
Kaine hasn't fixated on roads to the exclusion of other pet projects. He's still heavily involved in talks on bonds for college and mental health improvements. He's resisted advice from some Democrats to take Republican budget priorities hostage in order to win transportation votes, but also rejected partisan urgings that he allow traffic congestion to worsen and use it as an election issue in 2009 legislative races.
"The first priority is to fix the problem," he said. "I've never approached this primarily as a political matter."
Kaine's first step is to corral his own team toward consensus. Senate Democrats want to flex their new majority power with a hefty fuel tax increase that is stirring up bipartisan jitters in the House of Delegates. Kaine hasn't settled on a single approach but has signaled interest in a combination of sales, fuel and motor vehicle taxes.
Whichever plan he chooses, those who wish him well say it will take a powerful force of will to succeed.
"There's certainly an intellectual argument to be made here, but in the political realm where there are many opinions, intellect alone isn't going to get you there," said former Transportation Commissioner Philip Shucet. "He's got to bring a clarity of purpose that is razor sharp. He's got to say, 'This is why we're here.'"
Christina Nuckols is an editorial writer for The Virginian-Pilot. E-mail her at christina.nuckols@pilotonline.com.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
I didn't say I was on the
I didn't say I was on the negotiating team. I said that I believed that VB WILL use eminent domain to seize the property from NS. I don't believe that VB will give NS a fair market value for the right of way. I hope NS fights them for it if the price isn't fair. Eminent domain isn't a negotiation tactic at all, but an abuse of power. Fortunately the state legislature tightened the leash of out of control city councils that used to seize private property for the gravy trains of developers.
Sorry Keith, I did not know
Sorry Keith, I did not know you were on the negotiating team. I do know that the insinuation of the use of eminent domain is a negotiation tactic.
The Beach isn't going to
The Beach isn't going to negotiate with Norfolk Southern. I believe that are planning to take it using eminent domain. They don't want to pay N&S what the line is worth.
Well, regretfully, you may
Well, regretfully, you may think for yourself, but you are sadly misinformed. In the advisory referendum held on light rail, six years or so before there was ever a Yes Campaign, 46% of the voters in the referendum voted for light rail. Frankly, there was no organized campaign in support of the referendum, but despite opposition or silence from almost every political leader except Barbara Henley, it was a remarkable statement that foreshadowed the broad support that exists at the Beach for light rail. Of course, the oceanfront business leaders had been opposed to light rail; now, they have already taken a position of leadership in support of this initiatve. Any citizen who realizes that suburban sprawl is an unsustainable lifestyle must support the starter light rail system east to west down the abandoned Norfolk Southern rail line. If I am not mistaken, the Beach is in negotiations with NS on the purchase of this ROW and I certainly hope that happens very soon.
Excuse me Mr. Barrett. The
Excuse me Mr. Barrett. The YES Campaign was for the penny increase in the sales tax for transportation. This group and the ones pushing for the Light Rail between downtown Norfolk and Virginia Beach are virtually the same bunch. HRPDC, HRT, HR Chamber of Commerce, real estate developers, and the HR whatever groups. It really makes no difference. The same members and groups were all behind spending millions of dollars on light rail to move tourists between downtown Norfolk and The Virginia Beach Oceanfront with the remote possibility (my opinion)of expanding service to the Naval Base. In 2002 the same groups of gold diggers wanted to spend millions more on transportation projects that were sold to the public to relief gridlock for the ports and business, while selling it as projects to reduce traffic gridlock for those of us who would foot the bill. The MPO projects is just a repeat of 2002. I think for myself sir. I am not coached by anyone. You are so fed up that the state legislature is listening to their constituents and questioning the HR wisdom of these projects, rather than lobbyists looking for a taxpayer handout for a change. It has gotten your goat.
Well Mike, that post sure
Well Mike, that post sure did not help your cause very much, but I appreciate that you are going to the sources instead of listening to the anti taxpayers spin. But maybe we have talked this to death. See you on another forum.
Well Mike...
The Hampton Roads Crossing Study states that the target was a 10% reduction in congestion at the HRBT. So... if your commute is 1 hour and 30 min then you shave 9 minutes off your commute. How lovely, only 9 minutes off driving time. Now if you're going to the Naval Base you might shave only 5 minutes off your drving time.
Keith, again, reveal you
Keith, again, reveal you ignorance for all to see. The Light Rail referendum and the Yes campaign are two separate matters separated by about five years in time. How can we all try to intelligently discuss these matters if you are so confused by the anti tax rhetoric and propaganda put out regularly by certain posters. Point is, develop your own point of view after getting some basic knowledge of the topic. Then we can talk.
Disinformation?
Mr. Barrett, are you saying that the Light Rail referendum pushed by the YES Campaign and the HR entities are based on truth and fact? The six MPO projects pushed by you and the port folks are selling these projects as a relief to traffic gridlock and bottlenecks when in reality they only relieve it for the ports. And you are questioning the intelligence of the posters on this blog who disagree with you in regards to propaganda? And the best you can do sir is to resort to name calling? My my my. What a tangled web we weave. Sir, I have to question who you are accusing of trying to obfuscate and confuse the citizens.
Mike, please try to keep up;
Mike, please try to keep up; your lack of comprehension of the facts is astounding. Please know that a statement by the spokesman for the taxpayers organization that congestion will continue is simply not a fact. It is spin, an actual part of the taxpayers campaign of disinformation, a part of a heretofor successful strategy to obfuscate and confuse the citizens. It has clearly worked in your case, but to spout out their conclusions without looking at the facts yourself reveal a shallowness of involvement that I would not have expected of you. So if you wish to be taken seriously as a poster, check out the situation yourself before you accept the propaganda. Remember as well, that it is the anti tax zealots who have helped to elect Delegates who have signed the no tax pledge that have caused the congestion on our local roads that effects each of us most directly. The Commonwelath has cut funding for local roads by 75%, and of course the buying power has been reduced so much that most cities simply don't do new construction.