Nuclear carrier GW on voyage of diplomacy to Japan

Posted to: Military Norfolk


Video: The George Washington heads to Japan.
Hyunsoo Leo Kim | The Virginian-Pilot



CORRECTION
The relocation of the aircraft carrier George Washington from Norfolk to Yokosuka, Japan, is expected to cost the Hampton Roads economy approximately $430 million per year. The original version of this story contained an incorrect dollar figure.


NORFOLK

When the George Washington ties up in Yokosuka, Japan, in August, it will become the first nuclear-powered carrier based in the only nation ever to be attacked by nuclear weapons.

While its departure Monday from the East Coast brings both a sentimental and financial loss, its relocation to the Far East means the ship’s crew must bring along as much diplomacy as weaponry.

“What people don’t understand they sometimes fear,” said Rear Adm. Philip Cullom, commander of the George Washington Strike Group. “Sometimes it’s a matter of articulating the story so that people understand it.”

The carrier’s arrival in Japan comes as the Navy looks to improve its reach in the western Pacific and “brings a considerable increase in capability,” said Capt. Dave Dykhoff, the ship’s commanding officer. It will replace the Kitty Hawk, the Navy’s last conventionally powered carrier, which is due to be decommissioned.

Without the need for constant refueling, the George Washington can cover greater distances through the region at higher speeds, Dykhoff said.

It also will be on higher alert once it arrives in Japan as part of the Navy’s new maritime strategy. Technically, the ship could arrive one day and deploy the next. This means safer shipping lanes, deterrence of regional conflicts and more security for Asian nations and, ultimately, the United States, Dykhoff said.

After leaving Norfolk, the strike group heads first to Rio de Janeiro, where it will participate in an exercise with forces from Brazil and Argentina. From there, it will go to Valparaiso, Chile, then on to San Diego, Honolulu and Guam before reaching Yokosuka.

While many of the supply needs on this trip are no different from a standard deployment, the personnel issues are. Along the way, crew members will be coming on and leaving the ship in unusually high numbers. The largest swap will come in Honolulu, when about 900 sailors will “cross deck” between the Kitty Hawk and the George Washington.

Such large-scale moves present puzzles for the officers responsible for making sure the ships are staffed properly to deploy quickly if the need arises.

The George Washington has been homeported in Norfolk since its construction in the early 1990s.

It departs alone; no air wings or other strike group ships will relocate with it. Its move leaves four carriers based in Norfolk.

Since the George Washington will not be replaced in the foreseeable future, this means a loss of roughly 3,200 local jobs. Greg Grootendorst of the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission estimates the annual tab for this at about $430 million for the region.

In Japan, the effects of the carrier’s arrival will be less tangible but no less real.

Since 2005, when the Japanese government accepted the Navy’s request to replace the Kitty Hawk, the U.S. government has had to carefully consider which carrier would replace it.

Several candidates came loaded with political baggage.

The Norfolk-based Harry S. Truman was sensitive because of President Truman’s decision to drop nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II. The San Diego-based Nimitz is named for Fleet Adm. Chester Nimitz, who played a key role in the same war, as did Dwight D. Eisenhower, whose namesake ship is now based in Norfolk.

Theodore Roosevelt, whose namesake ship also is based in Norfolk, negotiated what many Japanese thought was an unfair treaty to end the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-05. The Carl Vinson and the John C. Stennis were named for chairmen of congressional armed services committees.

The carrier George H.W. Bush, which has yet to enter service, was named for a man who, long before becoming president, flew Navy bombers in battles with the Japanese. Norfolk’s Enterprise, the first nuclear-powered carrier to visit Japan, stirred up protests in the port of Sasebo in 1968.

The choice of the innocuously named George Washington hasn’t completely defused the controversy. A group in Yokosuka has been collecting signatures to keep the ship from docking there but so far has been rebuffed by the City Council.

Once the George Washington was agreed upon, the Navy set to work on the diplomacy.

“The public affairs piece is significant,” Dykhoff said. “There’s a, I would say, vocal minority in Japan that are opposed to stationing a nuclear-powered ship there. Certainly we all understand the sensitivities in Japan on the nuclear-weapons issue.”

The Navy’s task, he said, is to distinguish between nuclear weapons and nuclear power, which is readily embraced in Japan, and to be forthcoming about security provisions.

“The easiest thing, the best thing, is to tell the truth,” added Cullom, the strike group commander. “It’s pretty clear that nuclear propulsion is something we’re accustomed to working with. We’ve done it for many years. We have very high, rigorous standards and training.”

He noted that the Enterprise, a nuclear carrier roughly the same age as the Kitty Hawk, has operated safely for nearly half a century.

Another piece of the diplomacy is teaching the sailors who are moving to Japan about their new host country.

The ship’s Web site offers language and cultural instruction, as well as nuts-and-bolts information on driving, moving and the like. Professors from the Naval Postgraduate School will ride for part of the trip to Japan, educating the crew in the cultural nuances that will make for better relations.

Crew members with prior experience in the western Pacific have already begun teaching.

Chief Petty Officer Bradley Donaldson, who oversees the regulation of the ship’s gauges and electronics, spent eight years in Japan and is married to a Japanese woman. He’s been fielding questions on topics such as language, culture, food, money and liberty policies.

Sailors have also been questioning the Japanese government engineers who spent the past week reviewing the carrier’s systems.

Eito Hirokazu and Yoshida Kouichi said they’ve been asked about language, crime, travel, bars, driving, television and Japanese animation. They know they’ll be answering questions back in Japan as well.

“Many people worry about when the nuclear ship is coming, that the sea will be polluted by the reactor plant or the air, or that many Japanese working on the ship will get reactor radiation,” Hirokazu said.

“But it’s not true. It’s better for us to talk to people, to get out the information about the true facts.”

As for the sailors themselves, general excitement trumps all else.

Petty Officer 3rd Class Aaron Gaskins of Landover Hills, Md., said he’s looking forward to the “new experiences of seeing another culture that’s far different from the States.”

Petty Officer 2nd Class Kumba Calvin of Greenville, Miss., agreed.

“That’s what I joined the Navy for.”

 

Matthew Jones, (757) 446-2949, matthew.jones@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment to alert an editor. Update on new comment functions.

My Sailor Son!

I just want to say Son you are going to be missed so much. I love you and I just want you to be careful and take care of yourself. I promise to take care of your Wife and Son till they come to you later this year. I will truly miss my Son and Best Friend.

Love Mom

Good Luck

Good luck to all the sailors and families (I'm one of them!) and we will see you safe and sound in Japan.

Re Good choice

I like your post...Just wanted to proudly add..George Washington is also a Virginian as well. lol

good choice...

George Washington no less, leader of the U.S. revolution and first President. No need to comment on the nuke part because it's sounds like a done deal, it's going. We have the same nut cases here as well so no big deal. I'm glad we have a combatant as great as the Nimitz class carrier being forward deployed on a permenant basis and keeping the American Eagle's wings spread wide.
I did my last deployment of NINE onboard GW in 1997/98 on the staff of airwing-ONE in the Persian Gulf. So I perk up when I see or hear it's name. To the crew, fair winds and following seas and most of all enjoy the adventure of living abroad.....Good lick

Somewhat I think you mean a

Somewhat I think you mean a few not alot.

Have Fun!

Sailors of the GW -- You are headed for a great adventure! I spent 7 years in Japan and loved every minute of it! Get out beyond the base gates and really embrace it. The food, the beauty of the landscape, so much to see and do... As long as you are respectful and aware that YOU are the foreigner over there, the Japanese are wonderfully warm hosts. Make America proud!

Nothing wrong

There is nothing wrong with us being sensitive to the concerns of one of our closest allies, especially keeping in mind that a lot of our servicemen in recent years have been responsible for rapes and murders on the citizens of Japan.

I was stationed on the USS INDEPENDENCE in Yokosuka Japan from 1997 through 1998, and then after decommissioning I went back to the USS KITTY HAWK in Yokosuka from 1998 through 2001. If the GW sailors are open to this change, it can be a great experience for them.

Nuclear in Japan

Everyone takes sides on the should we have/shouldn't we have as far as what happened 60 years ago, but I think something to realize is that in the dawn of the nuclear age nobody knew how the long term effects of radiation really were. Perhaps had we known our thinking might have been different, but on the other hand we were looking at the potential of war in 1946-47 as far as a full-scale invasion of Japan, with potentially hundreds of thousands of casualties there, with the Russians coming.

There has to be some trust on the part of both sides now, some 60 years later. These days we are strong allies instead of adversaries.

PC GONE AWRY...

I'm sure the Japanese, when visiting Hawaii, take equal precautions not to test our sensitivities over their attack on Pearl Harbor. Ya', right! Our military bases in Japan are war booty from WWII, nothing more, nothing less. If that offends the Japanese, then it's their own fault, for they fired the first shots, prompting in our entry into WWII.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Military Stories

More articles from: Military rss feed   


Toolbox