NORFOLK
Three of the city's public housing complexes - and a small group of homes designed to help families leave public housing - failed recent federal inspections and have been labeled as "troubled."
Inspectors hired by the federal Housing and Urban Development department examined 21 Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority properties in February and March to make sure they were "decent, safe, sanitary and in good repair." Generally, property maintenance and security issues are reviewed.
Ten of Norfolk's complexes received the highest ranking - an improvement from last year when seven properties were in the top tier and eight failed.
"We're not where we need to be, that's apparent," W. Sheppard Miller, chairman of the housing authority, said Monday.
Moton Circle, a complex of 138 apartments that the authority wants to tear down, received the lowest score, 40 out of 100. Many of the problems stemmed from exterior conditions such as cracked sidewalks and ground erosion. The inspectors also cited locks installed on closet doors within the units as a safety concern, officials said.
For the past two years, the city has applied unsuccessfully for $20 million in federal grants to demolish Moton Circle and redevelop the property, which sits behind the Broad Creek neighborhood.
The Tidewater South and North Wellington complexes - as well as the housing authority's family self-sufficiency units, which are a handful of houses and duplexes scattered throughout the city - also received failing scores. The authority is appealing its grades for the homes in its self-sufficiency program, saying it was penalized for a broken fence not on its grounds.
"We need to determine how to turn the situation around," said Ulysses Turner, an authority board member.
Meghan Hoyer, (757) 446-2293, meghan.hoyer@pilotonline.com
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo
Upload Your Video
iTunes Podcast
Video Feeds
Watch The Dot
"decent, safe, sanitary and in good repair."
Do any of the above [especially sanitary] fall on the residents as THEIR responsibility? And ground erosion --- would grass help? I see lots of places where people do their darndest to keep grass/trees/shrubs, landscaping in general from growing...they actually TEAR it out! It's fairly well known that people take better care of something if they have to (1) assist in the upkeep, and (2) pay for all or most of it themselves and then be HELD RESPONSIBLE if they don't!
Locks On Closet Doors
I wonder if the closet doors didn't have passage/closet locks on them. Maybe the occupants/renters installed a key-lock, to keep children out..Maybe where they kept their gun, or things they didn't want their children to find...On the note of locks, I have noticed a lot of people put the deadbolt on the front door that are keyed from both sides.. I have been told it was done to curb a burglar's efforts..While it could have some advantages there, I have to wonder if an emergency such as a fire occurs, if they will have the time to look for the key.