The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
City officials plan to pump sand along the shores of the Chesapeake Bay despite protests from some property owners who argue that the move is an attempt to take their beach.
Sections of Cape Henry Beach, between First Landing State Park and the Lesner Bridge, have eroded and need the sand, officials said. In exchange for the sand, the city wants residents to sign over public use of the beach for recreation. Twelve of the 21 property owners and condominium associations within the two-mile stretch have agreed.
"Ultimately, we're providing free sand on the beach," said City Councilman Jim Wood, who represents that area. "It's protection against one big hurricane or one big nor'easter."
Louis Paulson, an attorney who plans to develop three lots just east of the Lesner Bridge, said the sand comes at too high a price.
"Effectively, you're giving up your right to the beach," said Paulson, who has threatened legal action against the city. "A recreational easement is total control of my beach."
The dust-up over the replenishment of Cape Henry Beach comes down to a frequently posed question in the resort city: Who does the beach belong to?
The public, Virginia Beach officials long have maintained.
Beach residents have walked along the beaches of Cape Henry for decades, police patrol and city workers collect trash from the bayfront, said City Attorney Les Lilley.
Paulson and the owners and residents of nine properties on Cape Henry Beach disagree. They argue that their deeds indicate that it's a private beach and they could, if they wanted to, restrict walkers, joggers and the general public from using the beach beyond the tide line.
Lilley has sent a letter to the nine holdouts, informing them that the project will start in January 2009, with or without their consent.
City officials have been working with Cape Henry Beach property owners for more than two years, trying to acquire easements that will allow pipes on the sand and affirm that the public has a right to use the beach. The two sides have reached a stalemate and the city staff needs to start planning for the project if officials hope to use the sand from the Lynnhaven Inlet dredging project scheduled for next year, Lilley said.
The inlet is cleared by the Army Corps of Engineers about every four years. In the past, the sand was deposited along the Ocean Park beaches, on the other side of the Lesner Bridge. There's plenty of sand there now, and the city has decided to build up the Cape Henry beaches to the east.
"It's much desired, and I hope it will go forward," said Penny Brown, a resident of Westminster Canterbury, a retirement community, where the sand has eroded to the sea wall.
Dona Storey, president of the Cape Henry Towers association, said she was willing to give the city construction access to the beach in front of her condominium, so her neighbors could get sand.
"We were looking at how we can be good neighbors without us giving up our property rights," Storey said. "If one neighbor wants to help another neighbor, why should that neighbor be punished,"
The city can't accept public-use agreements from some Cape Henry Beach residents and not others, Lilley said.
The dredging and replenishment project costs $2 million, with the city spending as much as $300,000. City officials only would use taxpayers' money to expand a public beach, Lilley said.
Even with the recreation easement, Lilley said, he doesn't expect public use of Cape Henry beaches to increase, since parking is limited.
City officials will continue talking to the nine holdouts to find some compromise, Lilley said.
Deirdre Fernandes, (757) 222-5121, deirdre.fernandes@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Keep it
Let them have their private little beach and when their house falls into the water due to a hurricane we can just laugh at them. Make them sign a waiver where they declare that they are totally responsible for their stupidity, and the taxpayers of VB are not to be held responsibile for their actions. Let's see how the insurance industry deals what that one!
STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES!
THAT'S WHY SMART PEOPLE LIVE IN KEMPSVILLE AND NOT AT WATERS EDGE!
"For those of you who live
"For those of you who live in Kempsville or Green Run or other parts of the city, when a noreaster destroys hundreds of homes there because the beach isnt wide enough, the insurance companies will jack your rates up or perhaps abbandon you all too."
Please explain to us how a wider beach affects the homeowners away from the coast? When you are done spouting that nonsense, perhaps you could see that rising water does not affect the homeowners in those areas as it is FLOOD INSURANCE that covers this, not homeowners. The inland properties are not affected as they are less affected by wind because of 'friction.' This basically means what we all know: it is less windy inland due to buildings and such block much of the lower wind whereas on the coast there is no protection.
They argue that their deeds
They argue that their deeds indicate that it's a private beach and they could, if they wanted to, restrict walkers, joggers and the general public from using the beach beyond the tide line.
But the city still wants to give them free sand from taxpayers dollars...
City officials only would
City officials only would use taxpayers' money to expand a public beach
The Bayfront Area
The Bayfront area is the most densely populated area of the city. The citizens pay more in city taxes per capita than any other segment of the city and get in return, the least. It is not a waste of money to widen this beach and nowhere was it mentioned that there would be any tax increase to pay for this. For those of you who live in Kempsville or Green Run or other parts of the city, when a noreaster destroys hundreds of homes there because the beach isnt wide enough, the insurance companies will jack your rates up or perhaps abbandon you all too. For those of you in the condos that are afraid of not being able to drink beer on the beach, hide it in a can coozie (no glass please) and watch out for cops.
Simple. The beach is owned
Simple. The beach is owned by the property owners up to the medium high water mark.
Eminent Domain
Why is it that the city uses eminent domain to take property from the poor and elderly, but negotiates and compromises with its lawyer and corporate friends? Another example of what will probably be a transfer of taxpayer funds to enrich the pockets of another greedy lawyer. Take the property by eminent domain with the benefit of the sand replenishment the only funds transfered. I sure wish the city would take care of my yard and pay me to do it. But what can we expect from the Great Neck Road, Laskin Road good old boy network of lawyers and politicians.
Why should the public that
Why should the public that has no desire to visit this area pay for replenishing anothers land out of their pockets?
When one bought close to the water one knew that it was moving land....the owners should be held responsibile for replenishing their own sand..and if it is on public land sandwiched between private land...it should be forgotten and left to waste away since as most of these private owners state..they can restrict access to the area the city wants to replenish..who benefits then? ONLY the private homeowners..
C'mon people, get real..we do not need 2 million dollars worth of sand that could be deemed inaccessable at any given time...don't we have better uses for this money than a piece of land that could go NO trespassing at any time???
Here We Go Agan.....Thiefs!!!!!
TaxemDorf is at it agan!!! Stealing Property and Tax Money both from the Poor to give to the Rich. Who gains in this theivery. The Rich Hotel owners and Builders along with the kickbacks to the council members especially TaxemDorf!!! Vote Them Out!!!!!