Forecasters say Virginia coastline will retreat dramatically

Posted to: Environment News Virginia

Over the next century, most of the barrier islands on Virginia’s Eastern Shore would be lost, the ocean would breach into Back Bay in Virginia Beach and local rivers would swell and cover more than 10,000 acres of undeveloped land in Hampton Roads, a new study about global warming concludes.

The study released Thursday by the National Wildlife Federation provides one of the most detailed and localized forecasts of what might happen in the Chesapeake Bay region if climate change continues unabated.

Its conclusions are based on conservative assumptions about rising sea levels around the Bay – about 2 feet higher in coastal Virginia by 2100 – and uses computer modeling to create what-if maps of specific geographic areas, from Hampton Roads to Baltimore to Delaware Bay.

The results are not pretty: Ocean beaches decline by 58 percent along the mid-Atlantic coast; 161,000 acres of brackish marshes go underwater; 167,000 acres of dry lands are gone and replaced by open water or salt marshes.

“Even under the low-end scenarios, of sea levels rising 1 to 2 feet, there’ll be significant changes throughout the Bay,” said Patty Glick, a senior global-warming specialist with the National Wildlife Federation, based in Northern Virginia. “We absolutely have to deal with sea-level rise.”

Glick and others urged Congress to pass a bill, co-sponsored by Virginia Sen. John Warner, a Republican, that would set a national cap on greenhouse-gas emissions and let industries buy, sell and trade pollution credits in order to meet new limits.

This “cap-and-trade” proposal is scheduled for a Senate vote next month.

Group leaders also recommended that federal, state and local agencies start factoring in global warming with their coastal planning and construction of new utilities and roads, and to limit or prohibit new development in areas likely to be swamped by rising waters.

The governors of Virginia and Maryland have both convened climate change commissions to study and then recommend specific actions for reducing emissions linked to global warming in their states.

Gov. Timothy M. Kaine has called for a 30 percent cut in such emissions in Virginia by 2025, a mark that would be about what was pumped into the atmosphere in 2000.

Skip Stiles, a Norfolk resident and environmentalist who sits on Virginia’s climate commission, said the new study and its computer maps provide some of the best visual clarity, which brings home a key point that he and others have been making for years – sea levels are rising now, are rising faster than 100 years ago, and that people who live and work in coastal areas better wake up and take action.

“Norfolk’s very future is dependent on how we respond to sea-level rise,” Stiles said.

One of the biggest losers, according to the study, is the Eastern Shore in both Virginia and Maryland.

Flat, low-lying and sandwiched between the Atlantic Ocean and the Chesapeake Bay, the Eastern Shore is expected to see its barrier islands and coastal marshes nearly vanish in the next 100 years. As much as 90 percent of all tidal marshes could be swamped by rising seas by then, the study says.

Popular Eastern Shore beaches in Chincoteague and Assateague are expected to be “overwashed” by the ocean and nibbled away by increased erosion, according to the study.

The study uses the same estimates as those by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, an international coalition of scientists who won a Nobel Peace Prize for their work in unraveling the complexities of global warming.

Last year, the IPCC concluded with 90 percent certainty that human activity and the burning of fossil fuels have greatly contributed to warming conditions around the world.

Still, many skeptics remain, especially in the United States. They insist global warming is a hoax, a miscalculation of weather data and trends.

President Bush withdrew from Kyoto Treaty negotiations with other nations to cut emissions, though he believes global warming is real. All three presidential candidates from the Democratic and Republican parties are calling for a national program to tackle the phenomenon.

Emmett Duffy, a professor at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, said climate change is bringing spring about three weeks early to Virginia these days when compared to the 1960s.

Duffy said the Bay already has gotten a taste of global warming’s impacts. In 2005, unusually warm water conditions killed huge swaths of eel grass in the lower Bay, erasing a key habitat for crabs and fish and a source of oxygen in the water.

While some of the grass beds have started to grow back, Duffy said many have not – a harbinger of what might be coming with warmer summer and spring temperatures.

“Global warming is not a future threat to the Bay,” Duffy said. “It’s a threat now.”

 

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Fraud

"Tatu, I think you just answered my question. Rip currents, yada yada, have everything to do with the sandbars and normal wave action and the tide."

I am still laughing. Literally, laughing out loud. Even freshmem students could have dented my argument more effectively than you..."the geologist." So your not going to explain to the class that the current is opposite on each side of the rip current? Even that a freshman could have beat down. LOL!

"As for the polar ice caps melting, I like the Wyoming idea, but put 3 ice cubes in a glass of water and let them melt. The level of water will not rise or fall because the mass is the same, so the displacement remains constant whether the cubes are solid or liquid."

Please explain how displacement comes into this? If a large part of the glacial ice is not in the sea, then it is added to the sum. If the ice cubes are on the counter and then added to the glass of water the level does rise. Your a fraud.

Re: Mark Twain

Well said!! Well Researched!!

Jack Simple

Getting together in one place doesn't make the village idiots a majority.

Before you start thinking that you and other flat earthers are anything but a nutty fringe, take a look at a recent Gallop poll:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/106660/Little-Increase-Americans-Global-Warming-worries.aspx

Six out of 10 Americans believe we are already feeling the affects of global warming. Only one out of ten Americans shares your delusional belief that global warming is a "crock".

Unfortunately, only a third of Americans are very worried about global warming and think we must take action now.

That's because most people are like you. They don't care whether they are right or wrong - someone else, probably our children, will pay the steepest price for our ignorance and arrogance.

Missing The Big Picture

While you're all bickering, you're missing the big picture. Solar activity has an impact on our atmosphere as the sun moves through its life cycle. The spinning of the earth's core is slowing down, as is normal in a planet's life cycle. As it slows, the earth's gravitational field will continue to weaken, leaving the planet vulnerable to the effects of solar flares and coronal mass ejections as the sun expands. This is changing the chemistry of our atmosphere in ways we don't understand.
We can argue about global warming, but it's only a phase within a cycle. We're born. We grow, live, and try to take care of ourselves, but weeventually die. Planets are no different. Doesn't it just make sense that we should clean up behind ourselves and leave the planet in decent shape for our children to enjoy? It's a nice planet, relatively speaking.

I love it!!

I'm counting at least twenty to one in favor of seeing through this crock of bull for what it is.

If you can't beat 'em, join'em

I think I'll open a store selling crystal balls!!!!

Global warming is a trend

Global warming is a natural trend that will continue regardless of the levels of CO2 produced. The doomsday predictions will not comment on the evidence - proven - not concluded, that show over the past centuries as temperature averages moved downward, CO2 continued to increased and conversely, as the temperatures were increasing, the CO2 levels were still in a downward trend. Temperatures are going to change regardless of what we do. We can clean up the air, which is a goal but that will not change the natural environmental changes from occurring. The press rejects stories on significant solar activity change over the last decade or so and how in the past, activity was noted significant with climate change. It is all going to happen no matter what anyone does.

What Teachers are you talking about?

"The sad thing is our schools have been brain washing our children this garbage for decades; they are warping the minds of so many children to worship the words of the Wildlife experts. I have been struggling to correct that kind of BS knowledge in my own kids.

Most people would agree that human activity cause pollution, what our kids are beening taught is that the earth will one day be unable to sustain human activity and thus change the status of human survival."

OH really? I had no idea I was teaching such things to my students. What do I teach them? Recycle, conserve, etc. Do I tell them that if they don't the world will end? Of COURSE NOT. Why in the world would we want to scare our students? I personally don't want to scare them, so even if I believed that, I wouldn't say that to my students. But perhaps before you believe everything your kids tell you (believe half of what they tell you, and I'll believe half of what they tell me), maybe ask your kids' teachers before you start blaming everything on them.

RE: Falconski

Falconski must have missed the lecture and his degree in Geology. Ira don't argue with him as he is just a birdbrain (falconski name fits him). Every geology book printed has the sand going south from MD to SC down to Florida. Of course this idiot thinks otherwise!!!!

I am telling you people...

You need to listen to AlGore, Manbearpig must be stopped!!!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners

special features