'Green' buildings catch on in South Hampton Roads

Posted to: Environment News

When it opens in 2010, Virginia Beach’s Renaissance Academy will use kitchen water heated by solar panels and feature a rooftop garden over one wing.

Lamberts Point Community Center in Norfolk, slated to open late next year, will boast large roof overhangs to block the hot Southern sunlight, and underneath its parking lot large filters will clean rain runoff before releasing it into sewers.

Both buildings – and roughly two dozen others either under construction or planned for South Hampton Roads – will be certified as environmentally friendly by the U.S. Green Building Council.

Going green has become the latest trend in government and commercial construction.

While the buildings are more expensive to create, the added costs are recouped in long-term savings on electric, heating and water bills, proponents say.

“It’s not a passing fancy,” said Tony Arnold, director of Virginia Beach schools’ Office of Facilities

Planning and Construction. “It pays itself back operationally. But environmentally, it’s what we need to be doing.”

South Hampton Roads currently has seven buildings certified through the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED, rules set by the Green Building Council. The nonprofit council, which has chapters nationwide, promotes environmentally friendly construction.

Its rules require everything from more energy efficiency to using recycled materials for construction. Buildings are rated on a point scale and can get credit for small things, such as locating near a public transportation line, to big projects, such as heating with geothermal wells.

Craig Cope is blunt about why the extra work is worth it.

“Buildings are hogs,” said Cope, vice president of Liberty Property Trust, a nationwide builder and manager of office and warehouse space. Liberty has built one green-certified office in Chesapeake and is at work on its second.

Buildings create nearly 40 percent of all greenhouse gases and use 40 percent of all energy, Cope said. That means while everyone has focused on fuel efficiency in vehicles, their homes, schools and offices have sucked up more power and released more harmful emissions.

“Everybody realizes that there’s something to this,” he said. “This is just one step to help alleviate that situation.”

Virginia Beach opened the state’s first green-certified school, Hermitage Elementary, in 2005.

Waterless urinals and flush toilets that use recycled rainwater mean less water consumption, and its green construction required 10 percent less electricity than nongreen elementary schools, said Tim Cole, the system’s sustainable schools project manager.

The school system is building Renaissance Academy, Virginia Beach Middle School, Windsor Oaks Elementary, Great Neck Middle School and a bus garage to meet the LEED standards.

In the case of Renaissance Academy, which will house middle and high school students, green construction will add $1.3 million in costs to the $65 million project. The school system has projected that it will recoup those expenses in the first 13 years of operation, Arnold said.

“For someone to go out and build as cheap a building as they can, but to still have all these high maintenance and utility costs, is really irresponsible,” Cole said. “It should just be the way we do business.”

Like the school system’s other projects, Renaissance will feature a computer kiosk in the lobby so guests and students can monitor everything from rainwater reserves in the holding basin to energy usage in the building. Students will be able to look out onto the rooftop garden, a feature that helps cool the building and control rain runoff, and see solar panels that will put energy back into the local grid.

“We want the building to be a teaching instrument as well,” Cole said. “The kids will eventually take this stuff home with them.”

The cities of Chesapeake, Suffolk and Norfolk, along with the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, all are planning their first green-certified public buildings .

In Chesapeake, construction on the 6th Precinct police station in Hickory begins this summer. Councilwoman Rebecca Adams hopes it will be the first of many environmentally friendly construction projects in her city.

Last June, Chesapeake’s City Council unanimously agreed that all new publicly funded buildings would be LEED-certified. Adams said there could be later measures to encourage private developers to make the same choices.

Roanoke, Charlottesville, Arlington and other Virginia cities offer incentives such as tax breaks and expedited permitting for developers who build green.

“We wanted the public sector to lead,” Adams said. “Green has just exploded, particularly in the last 12 to 18 months. The very fact that people are talking about it, thinking about it is a good thing.”

 

Meghan Hoyer, (757) 446-2293, meghan.hoyer@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

IRA, my bad

I saw the picture and assumed it was for some unrelated advertisement because there is almost nothing about it's design that looks "green". Massive expanse of lawn, no rain gardens, the typical non-creative foundation plantings, the black roof you mentioned, & the black asphalt paving. If the building were truly green it would filter its rain water and allow it to percolate back into the soil, not divert it to storm sewers.

About Norfolk again

Nothing in the newly projected highrise buildings in Norfolk has any mention of a green anything. At what point will their consideration become reality?

Huh?

I am trying to figure out how Section 8 housing came into the discussion. Why the NIMBY attitude? Because of the high number of trashy people that come along with it. There's no shame in being poor, but there is everything shameful about vandalism, thuggery, theft, and plain old fashioned lack of home training or personal pride. How do you combat "reverse snobbery" and a determination to be everything that a decent person is not? This is what I now have IN my back yard thanks to the closing of projects and additional police presence in other areas!!

Back to green...it's critical for widespread adoption to make the cost/benefit attractive to the masses. For example, in the part of Australia where long term droughts have caused serious water restrictions to be put in place, my parents received tax deductions and a break on their water bill rate for installing a drainage water catchment tank on their house and a grey water catchment system for the washing machine so that water used for outside and cleaning chores such as the floors did not have to come from the tap. Because of the breaks they received, it was not cost prohibitive.

Green Buildings

I think it would be great if all public buildings were required to be green. Not just in the construction but also in the maintenance and operation phases as well. Environmentally and economically in the long run would be good policy for our government. Wake up officials and do what is right for our citizens. It would mean healthier and happier constituents.
Regards, Darrell

wsspeid

Yes sir, I understand the point your trying to make. However, one of the most glaring architectual problems with the overheating of suburban and urban centers is the use of dark roofing materials. Perhaps you did not look a the photo of the building? While their may be a garden on the rear portion, the slope of what is visible will never hold any such thing. To call a building 'green' and then apply a dark roofing material is indeed a farce. It has a negative impact on this buildings ability to cool itself. It also has a negative impact on the community by retaining heat in the vicinity as well. I appreciate the effort of the designers and builders, but if you are going to hold up a building as 'green,' it should not contradict known methods to reduce the effort of the buildings HVAC system. Like another poster has stated about prior 'green' standards not being considered effective anymore, this standard is already known to have problems. My point is that it should not be the model of 'green' as it has been presented.

I got two words for you...

"Peak Oil"

It's time to change the way America thinks about energy. It's time to put a tax (better than a pox!) on people who choose to drive 13 or 14 mpg vehicles and it is PAST TIME to get serious about finding ways to conserve our dwindling resources.

dap and poco

dap--you will see "green" in residential in our future. there are several developments in the US that have had great success in building sustainable homes--a great example is high point in seattle.

poco--rather than putting LEED building down, you should appreciate that steps are being taken to reduce environmental impact. people will always be developing and now more responsible techniques are gaining popularity. this is good and i'm sorry that you fail to recognize it.

hold on now !!!

The State of Virginia allreaddy has/had a "Green Bldg Certified Scale" it came out in the early 80"s It mostly deals with energy consumption and energy loss The olg KROGER properties off newtown Rd were green labled bldgs when they were built..their not now..mostly because their glass is one pane and their heat pumps are old and out dated(new heat pumps have SEER numbers)...MOST hell all so called green initiatives have and were thought of or started in the late 70s and 80s the reason they were not used or carried out is us...back then we said ya ok and just keep on useing useing useing..we need bigger and more of to be someone.....bigger houses..bigger cars no SUVS..showers with several heads..lights everywhere..most new homes have two,yes two,heating and cooling units..meaning we(a family of five)use to be able to live in a house with 1000 sqft now we have to have 2000sqft plus with several baths..What happen to the old tv commercials Smokey Bear The old Indian crying you no the enviromental commercials...we new things then how come we are learning them all over...wake up turn the lights off close the door we dont have to worry about this yet come on ignore it just like we did i

Green Building

The fact is, sustainable (green) building is cheaper in the long run but, as evidenced here, there is substantial resistance to change, particulary here where people seem to delight in displaying their ignorance of things they've allowed the rest of the world to gain a competitive advantage in developing.

The biggest obstacle to superior construction methods and materials and increased energy efficiency is that many traditional developers and local bean counters aren't knowledgable in the new technologies or willing to put the investment into long term savings so they derail these efforts any chance they can get. However, with energy costs so high, many people are starting to rethink the need to reeducate themselves and make improvements where they can.

Residential Green building

Has anyone else seen that house being built or that was built in Indian River Plantation in VB? Near the back? I guess thats supposed to be a green building. How water recovery, solar panels, passive water heating, geothermal wells. Its pretty cool from what I've seen.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


special features