70°
forecast

Marines living out the motto: 'First, do no harm’

Posted to: Military

BLACKSTONE

One by one, young Marines in full battle gear climbed into the turret of a desert Humvee parked on a live-fire range at Fort Pickett.

The troops had almost no combat experience – one in 10 has deployed.

An instructor told them to imagine a vehicle was approaching their checkpoint. The Marines had to decide when to reach for a warning flare and when to snap off rounds from their automatic rifles.

The lead instructor, Gunnery Sgt. Howard Willis, described the training as “tactical patience.” For new recruits eager for combat, it’s a vital check.

Outrage over the killing of 24 civilians in Haditha in 2005 and recognition that restraint can be crucial when battling insurgents have led the Marines to adjust their tactics in Iraq. They might best be summed up by the motto on the cover of a new Marines war-fighting manual: “First, Do No Harm.”

Marines have regularly changed their tactics, including rules of engagement and the escalation of force, throughout the Iraq war, said Lt. Col. Jay Mannle, a judge advocate general in the Marines’ international and operational law division at the Pentagon.

Lesson learned in Iraq and Afghanistan filter up the chain of command and are worked into predeployment training. The field manual isn’t so much new ideas as a refinement of how Marines should conduct themselves, Mannle said.

The military has to strike a balance between protecting its force and gaining the trust of the local population through steady, peaceful engagements, said Aaron Karp, a former Army officer and political science instructor at Old Dominion University.

This can seem counterintuitive to Marines, the Navy’s infantry and front-line force.

Marine recruits often choose the force for its aggressive, no-nonsense manner, he said. New recruits “tend not to want 'maybe’ ” as an answer, he said.

After Haditha, which involved a squad from the Marines’ 3rd Battalion, 1st Regiment, Navy Secretary Donald Winter faulted some in the corps’ leadership for downplaying the size and scope of the incident.

In letters censuring Maj. Gen. R.A. Huck and Col. R.G. Sokoloski, Winter wrote that their actions failed to recognize “the importance of gaining the support of the civilian populace in accomplishing the mission.”

Mannle declined to talk specifically about Haditha. But he said, “The fight over there is a counterinsurgency. When you’re fighting a counterinsurgency, you don’t want to lose the support of the people.”

At Fort Pickett, the leaders of the Camp Lejeune, N.C.-based 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, or MEU, drilled that into their young troops.

Self-protection remains the top priority, said Lt. Col. John Giltz, commander of the MEU’s combat logistics battalion. “You have to be prepared to be engaged,” he said. But he said Marines realize that “we don’t win any friends when we injure innocent people.”

On a recent blustery, gray morning, Willis briefed about 40 Marines from the military police unit under a small metal shelter.

The men and women had been pulled from their regular jobs and specialties to fill the squadron. Just one-quarter had been trained as military police. At this time last year, many were in high school or starting community college.

“They haven’t learned any bad habits, but …” Willis trailed off. “It’s like you’re building them from the ground up.”

They expect later this year to deploy aboard Navy amphibious ships. Assignments in Iraq or Afghanistan await them. There, they will provide security for convoys.

At Fort Pickett, the young warriors were packed down with camouflage helmets, body armor, and various automatic weapons – mostly M-16s and M-4s – strapped to their shoulders. The weapons might someday become their best friends. But for now, they’re just neighbors.

With Willis by his side, Pfc. Jason Almodovar slipped into the gunner’s turret of the sand-colored Humvee. He pictured a vehicle speeding toward his checkpoint, past the grass and dirt berms and a row of targets fixed at regular intervals along the field.

Almodovar, a tall, wiry 20-year-old from central Florida, waved an orange flag and pounded the palm of his hand against his fist, pretending to launch a flare.

As the threat grew more urgent, Almodovar spun the armored turret around and grabbed the mounted M-240G machine gun. He steadied and squeezed off several rounds into the targets .

A few minutes later, Almodovar hopped off the Humvee with an adrenaline-fueled grin. He’d been a little nervous, he admitted, but the instructors provided steady feedback.

Willis knows the training will be repeated many more times before deployment. Then it will be practiced still more overseas.

He returned in September from a tour in Iraq’s Anbar province, where U.S. forces are working to rebuild trust with local sheiks after the Haditha killings.

“It’s something that’s going to be force-fed them through the deployment,” he said. “It’s embedded. That’s what it needs to be.”

 

Louis Hansen, (757) 446-2322, louis.hansen@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

This story is not about "PC" rules of engagement

If you read carefully, these practices are being put in place because these Marines are NOT fighting on a battlefield. They are fighting in cities and villages and amongst people whom THEY NEED, if they are going to be successful against a counterinsurgency. If you want informants and friendlies around you, you can't go firing first and asking questions later. It's not the Marines fault, it's the mission they were given. I suppose we could take the "Kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out" approach, but...really?

The need for another kind of troops

The conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan shows the need for another kind of soldier: the peacekeeper, one who is trained in dealing with such situations and how to use the minimal amount of force necessary to accomplish a mission. Peacekeeper units should have an abundance of personnel that are familiar with both language and culture of whatever country they are assigned to.

It is wrong IMO, to use U.S. Marines for this kind of mission. Our Marines should be the feared spearhead of any operation. If the Marines are called in, EVERYONE should be afraid, VERY afraid.

War these days means much more that just shooting at enemies or suspected enemies: it also involves the media and public opinion. Another Marine, Colonel Thomas Hammes who commanded a Marine battalion in Iraq wrote a brilliant book about this issue titled 'The Sword and the Sling.' America does a great job of fighting wars, but a poor job of winning and keeping the peace.

Subdue Iraq?

It's this kind of barbaric and utterly unrealistic thinking that has gotten us into such a hopeless situation. One CANNOT "subdue" an entire country, nor should it even be attempted. Let's not forget that we are ILLEGALLY occupying a foreign country and their innhabitants are not the enemy, we are the enemy and should not be there in the first place. The least we can do is teach our troops not to shoot at civilians.

This is insane

Our troops have to be able to respond to a threat swiftly and decisively. While I applaud their efforts to try to minimize collateral damage, their survival is their first priority. The terrorists don't care about collateral damage and we can't lose Marines to indecisiveness or failure to react because of the possibility of collateral damage. To do so means we lose because our enemies know no restraint.

Rules!

After Beirut and Mogadishu you would think these PC bean counting morons would realize that the ROE's are used by our enemies to their advantage.
My son is the first generation as of yet to have not served this country and the fact that his grandfather and I know his hands will be tied endangering his life for some PC crap is the reason.

Not "Recruits"

Marines are not recruits as soon as they complete basic training at either Parris Island or San Diego.

They are called Marines before they leave the parade deck at boot camp.

What???

I thought this kind of rocket surgeon thinking went out with the Carter Administration. Now we know why it has taken so long to subdue Iraq. You can't bring a knife to a gunfight. Does the Pentagon seriously believe the enemy in Iraq, or future enemies are going to pause and reflect before engaging our forces. Whoever invented this idea should be fired for incompetence, or investigated for sedition. All this is going to do is give the enemy on the battlefield time to hone their attack.

Winning wars not battles

This is key to winning the war. USA can win any battle but this is about more than firepower. War as taught by Sun Tzu, Alexander, Gengis Khan was about Politics, Economics & Military. You have to consider all three. We are winning battles, but at the cost to our economy. Hence, the terrorists are succeeding my comprimising our prosperity. Allies help you reduce costs and meet objective more effectively. War is long term like chess, we are doing it short term like checkers.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features