Forecast
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Norfolk seeks end to arts groups' free rent at venues

Posted to: News Norfolk

By comparison

Norfolk spends $19.96 per resident on the arts.

Virginia Beach spends $5.11 per resident.

Chesapeake spends 44 cents per resident.

Portsmouth spends $2.79 per resident.

Suffolk spends 23 cents per resident.

Sources: the cities of Norfolk and Virginia Beach

NORFOLK

The city's three largest arts groups will slowly be weaned off public subsidies that have given them free rent for the past three years.

The rent and other expenses, such as staffing and security for concerts and plays, have cost the city $1.2 million, John Rhamstine, who runs Norfolk's seven arts and sports venues, told the City Council last week.

He asked the council for permission to begin charging the Virginia Symphony Orchestra, Virginia Stage Company and Virginia Opera rent again. However, he recommended that the city continue the subsidy for one more year and then gradually phase in rent fees.

For example, the groups would be charged 25 percent of their actual rent costs next year. In 2010, they'd pay 75 percent and by 2011, full rent costs.

The council, which informally approved Rhamstine's proposal, also learned that Norfolk spends about $20 per resident on the arts, nearly four times the amount spent per capita on arts by any other South Hampton Roads city.

The council's endorsement comes during a tough budget year for the city. City Manager Regina V.K. Williams has implemented a hiring freeze and recommended significant cuts to many departments' budgets and modest employee raises in her proposal for next fiscal year's operating costs.

Many council members said this week that helping the arts provides far more to the city than it costs. City leaders agreed to waive the rent when they learned of the groups' financial woes.

The arts are a quality-of-life issue, Councilwoman Theresa Whibley said.

"What would happen to the city if all of these venues went dark?" Councilman Don Williams asked. "It would hurt our budget bottom line."

In return for waived rent, the groups have given free performances and provided thousands of free tickets to local organizations, Rhamstine said.

"We are the arts center for this region," Mayor Paul Fraim said.

Norfolk has the 2,500-seat Chrysler Hall, which is the region's largest theater venue, Fraim said. The city also has the 1,600-seat Harrison Opera House, the 600-seat Wells Theater and the 620-seat Attucks Theatre. The 900-seat Jeanne and George Roper Performing Arts Center, also downtown, is owned by Tidewater Community College.

The venues generate millions of dollars from parking fees, admission, restaurant, sales and hotel taxes, Fraim said.

The Virginia Stage Company brought in $700,000 in direct revenues to the city last year, Keith Stava, who manages the organization, said. Overall, the company created more than $5 million worth of spending downtown, he said.

Stava said he agrees that it's time for his organization to begin paying rent.

While the arts have rebounded financially, cuts in state support and increased fundraising competition means the groups are not out of the woods, Rhamstine said.

"We will make it work," Stava said.

Carla Johnson, director of the symphony, said she appreciates the city's support.

"We knew free rent wouldn't last forever," she said.

The majority of the roughly $4.7 million the city spends on the arts goes to the Chrysler Museum, Rhamstine said. While the Chrysler gets $2.8 million, about $650,000 goes to the Virginia Arts Festival. About 1.2 million is awarded in grants.

If contributions to the capital campaigns of art organizations are included, the $19.96 cents per person the city provides would rise to $29.94 per person. The figure also does not take into account the millions of dollars the city spends subsidizing venues such as Nauticus.

This year, Virginia Beach plans to spend $2.2 million on the arts, or $5.11 per person, city spokesman Marc Davis said.

That figure does not include the additional $7.2 million the city provides to the Virginia Aquarium and Marine Science Center.

Portsmouth spends $2.79 per resident. Chesapeake sets aside 44 cents per resident and Suffolk spends 23 cents, according to Rhamstine, who said he culled the other cities' budgets for information on their arts spending.

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com



Artist

Gimmie $20 each or I'll cut my ear off.

Hummm, No takers. I guess I should take up another occupation.
So should all those grifters.

Not enough support is given to the Arts

The article states the extreme benefit the arts bring to the community, in revenue and in creating an entertainment destination. Thecity has shot themselves in the foot in not cultivating Granby Street and supported the venues that made ths a priority.
Been down there lately?

Proud.

I am proud to live in a city that spends four times more than Virginia Beach (Norfolk's closest competitor) on the arts!

Councilman Williams is right: What would happen to the city if the arts venues went dark?

Create a better Norfolk first

Why are specific figures given for other Norfolk venues, but Nauticus is glossed over as one of the venues adding up to costing the city millions? When will the tragic comedy that is Nauticus ever end? Oh yeah, I saw one ship these past months at the new port. Wow! It seems a lot of fat could be trimmed to get millions into the lives of Norfolk residents in a way that would benefit them in their everyday lives. Youth gang prevention programs, job skills training, better pay for cops, homeless prevention, these are all areas where it's going to take some creative artistry to improve Norfolk.

re: great civilizations

The great civilizations of the past have all been remembered primarily for their arts and sciences.

Says a lot about Norfolk, huh?

KEEP SUPPORTING THE ARTS PROGRAM>

I feel that the money spent is better than spending it on a bridge that the stores could pay for them self. I have not been a big fan of the arts program but I would like to see it spent on that than wasted on a bridge that I will never use.

GREAT CIVILIZATIONS

The great civilizations of the past have all been remembered primarily for their arts and sciences. What does it say about us that the arts are given little or no support?

Yeah! Who needs the arts anyway??

The heck with live performances of theater, music, and dance. Who needs 'em? As long as we have cable tv, we can find rebroadcasts of Hee-Haw, Jerry Springer, and Jackass.

Expensive Museum!

Wow, the Chrysler Museum costs quite a bit. You'd think once the structure is paid for the rest would be cake. But it appears to cost over $183,000 a month to run?

The arts

The Arts are an important lifestyle and a necessity for those who enjoy them and they bring in millions of dollars. I just wish the Virginia Tourist Assoc. would do more to advertise/promote them. I can see the problem, but I don't want it to be a "lights out". It's an issue Norfolk needs to look at very carefully. I look at the "arts" for the surrounding cities and I don't see as much as Norfolk has to offer, so it's no wonder their fees per person are much less.

Performing Arts

Virginia Beach plans to spend $2.2 million on the arts this year. I suggest you stop financing immediately and use this money for the "pedestrian bridge" you have been wringing your hands over. Let the patrons pay for this service. I never use it so why use tax money for the arts?

The City of Norfolk has no more reason....

being in the "arts" busines as they have being in the real estate business. This is simply one more opportunity for an inept administration to mismanage something they have no business being involved in in the first place.

$1.2 mil in grants - for what?

Sell these facilities off, let them start generating property tax revenue, and let the private sector do what they do best - provide a service and generate a profit.

Those poor misguided souls in Suffolk must have such an inferiority complex because their public servants are neglecting their cultural needs.

Bottom line

I have been a resident of Norfolk for 22 years. From what I see, the bottom line is FIRE the city manager, get someome who will have fresh ideas and do some good.


More Stories Like This

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox



    Video

    x
  • Search Videos
  • Upload Your Video
  • iTunes Podcast
  • Video Feeds
  • Watch The Dot

    The Dot is the local wrap up of news and entertainment.