Forecast
72°
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

U.S. paying price for energy indecision

Posted to: Editorials Opinion


DOMINION VIRGINIA POWER has asked for an 18 percent rate hike, which would raise the average monthly residential electricity bill from $91 to $107. The company says it needs the raise to compensate for huge increases in the cost of coal and natural gas, which it uses to generate electricity.

Dominion's costs have undoubtedly risen, and even a highly regulated utility deserves to turn a profit. Unfortunately, though, the company's request is just one more symptom of a global economic epidemic caused by rising energy costs. Just ask anybody who has bought gasoline lately. Or heating oil. Or food. Or anything made of plastic. Or that had to be moved.

Experts say oil prices, now well north of $120 a barrel, are probably headed higher still, an unprecedented spiral that threatens to cripple economies everywhere people drive, manufacture or eat. An America still trying to avoid a recession born in the mortgage markets may be especially vulnerable.

As bad as things have become, they're only going to get worse, if not in this outbreak, then in the next. Inelastic supplies, speculation in the commodity markets and growing demand from China and India make disruptive price increases a virtual certainty.

Such inflationary pressures are bad enough, but when American purchasing power - especially below the median wage - hasn't increased much in several years, the stage is set for sustained financial stress for people who can least afford it.

And though we have seen such a day coming, the world is still without good alternatives, at least immediate ones.

Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, for which the president has consistently argued and which this page has endorsed, would take years to come on line, as would petroleum production from oil sands, shale or coal. In any case, none of those is likely to lower oil prices much, and might make the problem of global warming even worse.

Some self-styled experts argue that what America really needs is new gasoline refineries, but capacity isn't the problem. The oil industry argues that it may even have too much capacity because of increased ethanol requirements. Ethanol is a double - maybe triple - danger to the planet. It is inefficient to produce, requiring almost as much energy as it provides; it also diverts farmland, fertilizer and crops from the food supply, raising the cost of everything from rice to tortillas.

The simplest solution to an immediate energy shortage is for OPEC to open its spigot. The problem is that nobody knows how long the cartel's supply might last, or what kind of international nastiness all the additional oil revenue would finance.

Electric plants fired by coal - like the one Dominion wants to build in western Virginia - are just too dirty to be safe, either for people or for the planet, in the numbers we'd need. Coal plants have already poisoned waterways across Hampton Roads with mercury, a powerful neurotoxin, especially for babies and nursing mothers.

Nuclear energy could go far toward satisfying America's needs, but those plants take a long time to build, decades from permitting to production, and the storage of waste is a problem still to be solved.

There are alternatives in the wings, including cheap solar, ethanol from nonfood sources, other biofuels, even some radical nuclear ideas. The problem is that America's current needs are gigantic, almost unimaginable. Ramping up solar or cellulosic ethanol - even if it's possible - would take as long as it would to build a nuclear plant.

The one solution both cheap and easy and available requires simple conservation: drive less, carpool, boost your home's insulation, turn off the lights. The kind of stuff everyone with sense already does. If enough more people do that kind of thing, it might get us through the current crisis, or at least buy us some time.

The problem is the next major disruption isn't far away. We might have time to prepare, if we get to work right now. But until the nation gets serious about weaning itself from oil, until it starts investing real money in alternative energy, the next crisis will remain always on the horizon, ready to sicken the healthiest economy.



Reagan disagrees with you

First, it's funny how you don't like more drilling because "would take years to come on line" but are all for building highways that take 20 years to build. Make up your mind, please.

And Reagan addressed your editorial 20 years before you wrote it.

"Those who preside over the worst energy shortage in our history tell us to use less, so that we will run out of oil, gasoline, and natural gas a little more slowly. Conservation is desirable, of course, for we must not waste energy. But conservation is not the sole answer to our energy needs."

Orion - ANWR and "western US" not comparable to Saudi

Your comparison is laughable.

Technically recoverable oil is estimated to be at least 5.7 and 16 billion barrels, with a mean avg of 10.5 billion. The U.S. consumes about 20 million barrels daily. Total oil independence at 20 million barrels per day (using the before mentioned 10.5 billion barrel mean) would only supply the United States for 525 days.

Do you have any offshore drilling oil estimates?

RE: An effort was made

Oh thanks, it's so much clearer now. NOT! The most incompetent and arrogant president this county has ever seen hasn't done anything, but put us in a huge debt, made us the most hated country in the world and will leave office with the lowest rating of any president in history, and even with that some will still support a babbling idiot. Makes no sense to me!

Not drilling in ANWR and off the coast

is as silly as not taking a shot of penicillin when you have an infection.

"an effort"

Chuckle, chuckle. Such great excuses you give for Bush's and the republicans' failures. Clinton had a majority republican Congress in both Houses in 1995 for that vetoed bill. Incompetent Buah has had a majority republican Congress in both Houses for over half of his eight year time in office.

An effort was made...

...by Bush to drill in ANWR and off the coasts. However both sides of the political system (mostly due to NIMBY's) wouldn't have it.

I simply mentioned Carter and Clinton because they directly refute the argument in the editorial; so get your leftist hackles down...

Orion

Just what has Bush done to resolve our oil or economic problems?

"we would be bathing in oil"

"Clinton vetoed drilling in ANWR and other western states (which contain more oil than Saudi Arabia. Had he not, we would be bathing in oil."

If it was as simple as (not) vetoing the drilling, what kept Bush and his republican majority Congress from getting all this drilling going?

Indecision?

Oh no, conscious decisions were made about our policies. Carter mandated no used nuclear fuel was to be re-used because of possible "danger.” Clinton vetoed drilling in ANWR and other western states (which contain more oil than Saudi Arabia. Had he not, we would be bathing in oil. The EPA has made it all but impossible to build new refineries due to the hurdles one has to jump to get it done.

Alternative energy sources? Solar is a joke; it's highly inefficient and requires highly toxic chemicals to produce not to mention the necessity of huge battery arrays. Bio-anything is also highly inefficient and polluting. Wind only works in certain areas and again you have issues with huge battery arrays (not to mention the NIMBY's).

Even if it takes 10 years to get ANWR or any other high-capacity drilling operation running, it would still be better than any alternatives that may turn up in that time-frame.

I have a question

With the upcoming presidential eelction, and based on the assumption that McCain and Obama will be the candidates just what will either of them plan to do to help solve our economic woes?


More Stories Like This

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox



    Video

  • Search Videos
  • Upload Your Video
  • iTunes Podcast
  • Video Feeds
  • Watch The Dot

    The Dot is the local wrap up of news and entertainment.