The Virginian-Pilot
©
Johnny Marocco Williams' timing was terrific. His luck was terrible.
On Saturday night - just four days after the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns - the 41-year-old Hampton man decided to stick up a pizza joint in Virginia Beach.
In doing so, he provided a timely lesson in the Second Amendment.
When Williams crept through the back door of Dominick's Pizza and Pasta on Holland Road with a bandana over his face, he gambled on two things:
That the safe was full of cash and the owner was unarmed.
He was wrong on both.
The safe - the one that Williams ordered Ferdinando Abbondante to open - contained just one item.
A 9 mm Berretta.
Unfortunately for Williams, Abbondante, the father of three and a former security guard, also knew how to use it.
"Nerves of steel," is how Abbondante's business partner and father-in-law, Roger Stephens, described him.
In interviews, Abbondante said he told the robber to just empty the cash register and get out.
Williams, however, was adamant that the owner unlock that safe.
The Italian immigrant did just that. Then he turned around and shot Williams to death.
If supporters of the Second Amendment had been looking for a textbook case of how gun ownership is supposed to work, they got it. An outlaw entered a restaurant brandishing a weapon and left on a gurney because a law-abiding gun owner decided to protect himself and his employees.
At this point in the investigation, Virginia Beach police have little to say other than shots were fired at the pizzeria Saturday night and the bad guy died.
"That's about it," said police spokesman Jimmy Barnes. "All indications are he (Abbondante) did nothing wrong."
Stephens told me that the dead man's weapon might have been a toy gun. The police had no comment, but Barnes noted that whether or not a weapon is real is usually immaterial.
Fear for your life is what matters in self-defense.
If Williams had been smart - and few criminals are - he would have driven to Washington to stage a holdup. D.C.'s unconstitutional handgun ban still guarantees that most citizens can't protect themselves. That will soon change, when the District enacts new gun laws.
I tried to reach Abbondante on Monday, but he wasn't at the pizza place that's named for his 7-year-old son. He was at the hospital with a worker who'd been splattered with the dead man's blood. Williams was HIV positive, Stephens said, so in addition to sanitizing the restaurant, workers were receiving medical evaluations.
In the aftermath of the shooting, Abbondante wasn't gloating. He told reporters that he wasn't "proud" of what he'd done but that his actions had been intended to save the lives of innocent people.
There's little doubt of that.
It's a pity that anyone had to die. But it was Williams himself who set those deadly events in action.
Kerry Dougherty, (757) 446-2306, kerry.dougherty@cox.net

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
This time you're spot-on
I don't always agree with you, Kerri. In fact, sometimes I wonder what they pay you for! But with this, you have hit the nail on the head. I could not have said any of this better myself. Way to earn your paycheck! =)
Special rules for possessing guns???
One poster stated that homes with small children would have to have special consideration. I would want to know what was meant by that. Would homes with small children be off limits to guns? Would there be special, mandated ways of storing guns, with random inspections to make sure concurrence is achieved? See where I am going with this? We always say we want to keep the government out of our bedrooms (any type of sex is allowed there between two consenting adults, etc. And the "right" to abortion grows out of that idea as well), but where are most guns stored? Do we really want a 3 AM knock on the door to show an officer that our gun is correctly locked down so young children cannot get at it? Cheers, MGM
Then
"If you want to see a difference in the violent acts committed by persons with firearms… our elected officials should increase the penalty for felons who possess firearms illegally, increase the penalties for committing a crime with a firearm… the cost of those crimes needs to be so great that someone would be very fearful of committing such an act."
Then what would be your excuse for all the gun rights you claim you need because of the cirminals?
It's really to bad you missed that aritcle, as a gun advocate you would not have liked what the Supreme Court rueling really does and does not do expeciall in state like VA were you already have the right to bear arms. If I had my way there would be a data base with evry gun bought and sold, and every gun you owned listed on it.
Firearms registration?
No, I did not read the June 28 Pilot Editorial.
Firearms are not registered… at least not in the sense that I believe you are referring to. And they should not be… the government has no business keeping a list of who owns firearms, how many, type and/or caliber. To many firearms owners, registration is viewed as the first step in an effort to confiscation.
If you want to see a difference in the violent acts committed by persons with firearms… our elected officials should increase the penalty for felons who possess firearms illegally, increase the penalties for committing a crime with a firearm… the cost of those crimes needs to be so great that someone would be very fearful of committing such an act.
Gabrielle
gabriellel45516 wrote I've got to chime in here in regard to your position that VA gun laws are too liberal. I totally disagree and believe our laws should be the rule, not the exception to the rule about gun laws.
Many of us have different opinions and I think those differences will determine if gun laws will change based on the new Supreme Court findings regarding the D.C. decision. I keep repeating myself, but I am not trying to take anyone's gun away, but I will continue to say there need's to be more restrictions in place. The S.C. stated it was illegal to ban hand guns in D.C. to protect ones home. I agree with that. I don't agree with guns being worn by everyone all over town and those that do own them should have to re-register them every so often, and pass a safety rquiremrnt on how to use them. When there are small childfren in the home, that needs to be taken into consideration also.
Sorry, GeorgeS
I've got to chime in here in regard to your position that VA gun laws are too liberal. I totally disagree and believe our laws should be the rule, not the exception to the rule about gun laws.
some years ago, as a female small business owner who often worked late into the night I applied for a concealed carry permit in Delaware. My application was denied. Not because of any criminal record (I have no criminal reord), not because of mental deficiences (some folks do think I'm nuts, but I have no history of mental disorders). Nope, my app was denied simply because the Judge had a personal problem with me.
xsnipe
Did you read the June 28 Pilot Editorial?
That ruling doesn't affect VA because...
Quite the contrary is true.
The recent SCOTUS ruling on the Second Amendment, while resulting from a case originating in DC, does affect all citizens of this country. The rights of DC citizens aren’t different from those citizens’ elsewhere in the country. And, given that there is an abundance of anti-Second Amendment groups that vehemently oppose personal handgun ownership, this case reinforces what many Americans have understood and believed for a very long time... the Second Amendment is an individual right, not a collective right, as was represented by the state (District of Columbia, et al) to the court.
at last
A story with a happy ending.
wewll, okay then
(Okay, then I wonder about how we ever decide when one opinion is more valuable than another. If we decide that all statistics are suspect (which would be a typical American reaction, since we all dislike math and we all love a good conspiracy theory), what is left to make this more than just a place to vent (which is often what voicing an opinion turns into)?)
It's opnions that can change laws sometime coupled with staticts quite often not. Try as anyone may, my opinions are mine, which consist of my experience, common sense, thinking through an issue, and sometimes even emotion. My opinion will not be taken away and they do not make me wrong and someone else right. As Americans we are entitled to our opinions. Where would this county be if our founding fathers did not have opinions? Many of this countries events, rights, laws and the list goes on started with an "opinion'.