Hampton Roads, VA - 11/08/2009
Clear66°Clear
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Finally, a good deal on Florida swampland

Posted to: Editorials Opinion




In the long, shady history of Florida swampland deals, this is by far the most promising - a plan to buy U.S. Sugar Corp. for $1.75 billion and incorporate its 292 square miles into a long-overdue restoration of the Everglades.

Florida Gov. Charlie Crist announced the tentative deal last week, to the delight of environmental groups who've been skeptical of an expensive, cumbersome re-engineering plan for the Everglades that state and federal officials have been ploddingly pursuing for years.

U.S. taxpayers - owners of Everglades National Park, the third largest national park in the lower 48 states - should be pleased, too. With the state's purchase, the restoration project - most recently estimated to cost $11 billion, with half from the federal government - could be accelerated and end up involving far fewer moving parts.

The purchase, due for completion this fall, would free up 187,000 acres of sugar fields that have severed the natural flow of water to the Everglades from Lake Okeechobee.

If that flow is restored, officials could scrap costly plans to build hundreds of deep wells as part of an attempt to recreate the marshes that developers, who viewed the Everglades as expendable swamp, began destroying in the late 19th century.

The benefits of the purchase are potentially much broader. In addition to restoring habitat for plants and wildlife, the deal would substantially reduce the amount of pollution that flows from cane fields into waterways near and far.

In recent years, phosphorous runoff from U.S. Sugar and others has been blamed for pungent algae blooms that have killed marine life in the Gulf of Mexico and caused respiratory problems for residents near the coastline.

The late Marjory Stoneman Douglas, whose 1947 book on her beloved "River of Grass" launched a long campaign to save the Everglades, would no doubt point out that the devil dwells in the details.

But, at this bend in the river, the purchase and closure of U.S. Sugar certainly looks like a sweet deal for a fragile ecosystem that has seen more than its share of flim-flams and false promises.



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

Way to Go

Thank you Pilot editorial board for once again supporting taxpayer funds being expended to rape the wallets of US taxpayers. Don't go crying the blues when the inevitable increase in the price of sugar occurs because of your support.

Taxpayers will not be helped, only hurt by this.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Editorials Stories

More Opinion Stories

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox