The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
Ping Zhang and Beatrice Harris have never met. The arcs of their lives are a world apart. But they have one thing in common: Both wish they had never heard of Aretha Smiley.
Zhang and Harris allege in court papers that they lost their homes to mortgage fraud, a seedy side effect of the real estate boom and bust that is on the rise in Virginia.
Zhang, 48, got stuck with a mortgage on a waterfront condo that he never even got to live in. It's now in foreclosure, and Zhang is on the hook for the unpaid mortgage and condo fees.
Harris, 67, lost title to the home she's lived in for 23 years and now has to pay rent to the new owner. At one point she fell behind and he had her arrested for trespassing.
Smiley, 37, was the loan officer for a now-defunct mortgage company who engineered both deals. Repeated efforts to contact her were unsuccessful.
The FBI is looking into the two cases.
Both transactions involved a straw buyer - typically someone with solid credit who is recruited, sometimes for a fee, to qualify for a loan and purchase a home with the understanding that someone else will make the payments. The FBI says straw buyers are a common feature of mortgage scams.
The travails of Zhang and Harris are a cautionary tale for homeowners in a time of roller-coaster real estate values. Consumer watchdogs say it's a perfect environment for scammers to latch onto what for most people is their most valuable asset: the equity in their homes.
As the housing bubble deflates and foreclosures proliferate, mortgage fraud is exploding. And Virginia is one of the hot spots.
Last year, for the first time, Virginia made the Mortgage Asset Research Institute's list of the top 10 states where fraud is most prevalent, coming in at No. 7. As recently as 2003, the state ranked 37th.
From all accounts, Smiley cut an impressive figure.
Zhang met her in November 2005 while both were house-hunting with Judy Boone, a Norfolk real estate agent. A native of China, Zhang had just arrived in Hampton Roads to take a job as a computer teacher.
Tall, slim and sharply dressed, Smiley was a smooth talker with a take-charge attitude who wore her Christianity on her sleeve. She looked like she had money, Zhang remembers. She drove a Mercedes.
Unbeknownst to Zhang, it was all a mirage. Smiley had declared bankruptcy in 2003, leaving more than 50 creditors empty-handed.
When Boone showed them both a four-story condo in East Ocean View, Smiley was smitten. The fully furnished unit had an elevator, a surround-sound speaker system and a Chesapeake Bay view.
At $515,500, it was out of Zhang's price range. But Smiley had a proposal.
She would pay the mortgage payments and condo fees for Zhang if he would take out the loan and become the purchaser of record - a straw buyer.
"Judy helped talk me into it," Zhang said. "She said property values were going up in that area and after one or two years I could sell it and make a profit. She told me Aretha would be the actual owner. I would just be a name."
So Zhang signed the papers. It was his first real estate transaction in America.
Boone, who represented both the seller and the buyer in the deal, denies that she helped talk Zhang into it.
"I was leery," she said. "I asked him several times, 'Are you sure you want to do this?' He said he did."
Boone also denies telling Zhang that property values were going to rise: "I told them they had risen in recent years. I made no guarantees about the future."
The loan papers identified Zhang as the buyer and said he intended to occupy the condo. Misrepresentation to a lender that a straw buyer intends to occupy the property is often a key element of mortgage fraud.
A separate agreement between Zhang and Smiley made it clear that Smiley would be the occupant. In that document, she agreed to make the payments for Zhang and to purchase the unit from him within 18 months.
Smiley moved in and began making the payments as promised. After 18 months, Zhang said, she offered him $20,000 to extend their agreement another six months.
He agreed, but the payments soon stopped. The $20,000 never materialized, Zhang said, and Smiley abruptly moved out in February, taking all the furniture with her.
Before Zhang knew what was happening, the property went into foreclosure. Now the mortgage company is coming after him, and his paycheck is being garnished for back condo fees.
The condo is back on the market at an asking price of $314,900 - nearly 40 percent less than Zhang paid.
"My credit has been badly damaged," he said. "It's very painful. I feel it every day in my heart."
In December 2006, Beatrice Harris was getting behind on her bills and decided to try to squeeze some equity out of her house. Her late husband had helped build the modest bungalow off Sewells Point Road in 1962.
At Everyday Lending, on Virginia Beach Boulevard, Harris found a loan officer who was happy to help: Aretha Smiley.
There was only one problem, Smiley told Harris: Her credit wasn't good enough to refinance the property on her own. But Smiley knew a way around that obstacle.
After moving into Zhang's condo, Smiley met Francis Getty, a construction supervisor who was helping build a new condo complex next door. Getty mentioned that he was looking for some investment property.
Getty said Smiley paid him $5,000 to become the buyer of Harris' house and take out a new, larger mortgage.
At the time, Harris' monthly mortgage payment was $821. Smiley explained to her that under the refinancing, she wouldn't have to make any payments for a year. In a handwritten contract, Smiley promised that Harris would be able to buy back the house at the end of the year.
The $115,000 balance on Harris' mortgage was paid off and Getty signed for a new, $170,000 mortgage. Smiley assured him that she would send him the money each month to make the payments.
The payments came for 10 months and then stopped, Getty said. When the one-year term was up, he began charging Harris $1,400 a month rent to cover his payments - nearly double what she was paying before for her mortgage.
When Harris fell behind in January, Getty had Harris and her daughter, Brandy Dobbins, arrested for criminal trespassing. They were taken by police cruiser to the Norfolk City Jail, where they spent seven hours before being bonded out.
It was only after hiring a lawyer, Harris said, that it fully dawned on her what had happened: In her desperation to get out of financial distress, she had been stripped of virtually all the equity in her home.
According to the settlement papers, Harris should have received $43,441 in cash from the refinancing. She received only $3,000, she said.
"I didn't know that I had outright sold my house to this man," she said.
Now Harris is suing Smiley for fraud. Also named as defendants are Getty, Everyday Lending and Jay Zimmerman, the Norfolk lawyer who handled the closing.
"He'd throw me a paper and say 'This is so and so,' and I'd sign," Harris said. "I didn't understand anything."
Zimmerman, who since has retired, was also the closing attorney in the Zhang-Smiley transaction. Zhang also has filed suit.
Zimmerman declined to discuss either case.
Getty said he is a victim, too: "For some reason, I'm being portrayed as the bad person here. All I did was buy a house."
Everyday Lending, meanwhile, has gone out of business. Danielle McDole, the owner, said she had no knowledge of any fraudulent activity.
As for Smiley, McDole said, she was fired.
"I don't know where she is," McDole said.
Harris is living month to month not knowing whether she'll be able to keep up the rent payments. For a time she was hospitalized for depression.
She keeps replaying Smiley's soothing fast talk in her head. Especially galling in retrospect, she said, was Smiley's penchant for flaunting her Christianity.
"She sat right there in that chair and prayed with me," Harris said. "Now I think, what a hypocrite. She's going to bust hell's door wide open."
The FBI reported more than 46,000 cases of suspected mortgage fraud last year - up from 35,000 the year before - with annual losses estimated between $4 billion and $6 billion.
The Boston-based National Consumer Law Center says the explosion of mortgage fraud has even spawned a side industry of scam artists who hold seminars in which they teach others how to drain equity from unsuspecting homeowners.
"So many people now are facing foreclosure because of all the creative financing years ago when the real estate market was at its peak," said Special Agent Leah Wynn, acting supervisor for white-collar crime in the Norfolk FBI office. "Now the balloon has popped, and people unfortunately are suffering as a result. We are seeing perpetrators victimizing and preying on those people."
Foreclosures in Hampton Roads rose 34 percent from April to May, according to RealtyTrac Inc., a company that monitors foreclosure activity.
The scope of fraudulent activity in Hampton Roads is just now starting to become apparent, said FBI Special Agent Tom Tierney, who investigates many of the cases: "It takes 18 months to two years to flush out because the people who are duped don't realize they've been duped until down the road - until it's too late."
Even when and if the scammer is prosecuted in criminal court, more often than not the victim must resort to civil court to unravel the fraud.
"That's a big mess to straighten out," Tierney said. "It will take some time and an aggressive lawyer."
Staff writer Harry Minium contributed to this report.
Bill Sizemore, (757) 446-2276, bill.sizemore@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Who's really at fault?
People need to know that they should read their own documents. The whole premise behind the scam screams fraud. Most good lawyers are very patient with you and will allow you to ask all the questions you want. They do not pressure you to make it quick, but cannot read your mind and fill in your lack of knowledge without knowing what it is. If you don't know, ASK! I can't understand why they would sue the lawyer, when it seems that the agent was the one who knew what was going on.
JMO
Maybe you did, maybe you didn't. The guidlines spell out they have the final say and is subjective. Isn't it odd that a news org chooses to limit and steer content? I was struck off of this thread for my description of one of Boone's agents creative suggestions on how to have an insurance company pay for a new roof. So I wrote the online editor. I assume I was struck down because of the following TOS:
(c) might adversely affect our public image, reputation or goodwill; or (d) should be taken down for any other reason.
So I am to assume that affecting advertising dollars falls in this category? How much do you have to spend in advertising to steer the news? Here's to hoping for another FOI request where the VP touts the importance of letting the public know.
"You can't cheat an honest man."
At least that's what Will Rogers claimed, and there is a lot of truth to it. In nearly all scams and con games, the mark is induced by greed to do something dishonest or trying to get something for nothing.
Straw purchases are frauds against the lender, and generally, when people conspire to commit a fraud, it is the lesser crook who gets left holding the bag. But these people are not victims, they tried to get something for nothing and got caught.
Almost every attempt to get money you haven't earned, from straw man purchases, to lottery tickets, to voting for politicians promising redistribution of wealth, will end badly, with the con man (or politician) getting away clean and his greedy dupes paying the bill.
I kind of like that it works out that way.
I MISSED IT COMPLETELY
After reading the story again, I realized that Judy Boone was aware of the contract between both of them and that it was illegal, but still went through the process. I wonder what the real estate board will think of that. This could set a precedence for all real estate agents that do improper deals.
Dual Agency Danger
Wow, represented buyer and seller, hope there's a signed disclosure by all parties by the agent/broker regarding dual agency. Never to old to lose everything you've worked for, over a full commission payday. In this situation, the deep pockets get picked first.
How could we have ever thought that?
'Getty said he is a victim, too: "For some reason, I'm being portrayed as the bad person here". Uh, you had an old woman and her daughter arrested and put in jail. Kinda comes with the territory.
I might say...
I might say that the victims are equally at fault, but then that might violate the Pilots new terms of service. Therefore, I'm not saying that.
SO...before you sign anything, read it. If you don't understand it, don't sign it.
I hope SMILEY gets what she deserves. (Uh oh, I put Smileys name in all caps...did I violate the TOS??)
jmo
Not always true, Ed
I agree with you that these businesses should be avoided (in most cases, but not all). I'd probably not do business with one myself, for that very reason. However, my brother-in-law owns a Christian-advertised business. He is a Christian and deals with his customers with honesty and integrity and he has more than enough work. Although probably rare, honest Christian-advertised companies do exist.
ed baskins
Excellent point! I bet she doesn't even go to church. Or even own a bible.
Watch out for the fish...
I was listening to a Christian radio station one day when the host decided to have people call in and say if they prefer Christian companies over companies that do not advertise themselves as such. He was shocked that the results were overwhelming that the Christians calling in shied away from anyone that advertised themselves as a Christian business. I, myself, have always noticed that when someone wears their Christianity on their sleeve that it is time to hold on to my wallet. It did not surprise me one bit that Ms. Smiley flaunted her religion like this. I wonder what her church thinks about this.