Hampton Roads, VA - 02/10/2010
Overcast41°Overcast
Light Rain
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Navy program stresses safety for motorcyclists

Posted to: Military Norfolk Transportation and Traffic


Video: Sailors learn to handle sport bikes safely.
Hyunsoo Leo Kim | The Virginian-Pilot


Petty Officer 1st Class Brandon Thompson takes part in military sport bike training at the Norfolk Naval Station on Wednesday. (Rich-Joseph Facun | The Virginian-Pilot)



NORFOLK

At the signal, the 11 riders started their sport-style motorcycles with a chirp of their ignitions. Engines rumbling and ready, they stood by for instructions.

The first exercise Wednesday had them making their way around a large ellipse to warm up their tires, then easing into a weaving pattern to practice working their handlebars and looking through their turns.

The riders' immediate plan: to get better at riding the high-powered bikes, which originally were built for racing but are appearing increasingly on streets.

The Navy's goal: to keep the riders safe. The statistics are grim.

Since October, 32 sailors and Marines worldwide have died on motorcycles. Of those, 30 were riding sport bikes. The previous year, 66 percent of Navy motorcycle deaths and 78 percent of Marine motorcycle deaths were on sport bikes.

To bring down these sobering numbers, the Naval Safety Center joined forces last fall with the Motorcycle Safety Foundation to quickly develop a course that addressed the specific handling and speed challenges of these machines, which can reach 200 mph.

The one-day Military Sport Bike Rider Course rolled out at the beginning of June in Norfolk, San Diego and Mayport, Fla., as well as Japan and Europe. The goal is to train all 12,500 Navy and Marine sport bike riders by the end of this riding season.

The course is mandatory for any service member who owns a sport bike, and comes in addition to the basic rider course all uniformed and civilian Navy personnel are required to take. The Army has adopted similar training for its soldiers.

The course focuses on the two main causes of death riders face. The first involves a single-vehicle accident where the rider takes a turn too quickly and loses control of the bike. The second comes at intersections, when the unseen rider is hit by a car or truck.

In the first case, the issue is handling, said Don Borkoski, the safety center's motorcycle safety manager. The sport bike's higher center of gravity makes it more maneuverable, but also more dangerous because riders literally fall into their turns.

Riders handle the second case with a refresher in defensive driving. On Wednesday, they took turns starting from a standstill, advancing to second gear, then coming to a quick halt behind a car that had supposedly stopped suddenly in front of them.

They then checked their mirrors to find another imaginary car rushing up behind them, oblivious, and had to quickly pull out of the way to avoid getting hit.

Petty Officer 1st Class Brandon Thompson, who was practicing on a 600cc Suzuki, said that, though he's been riding for four years, this type of true-to-life training is invaluable.

"Cars don't see you," he said. And with so many drivers talking or texting on their cell phones nowadays, he added, when they come up behind you, "all you hear is tires screeching."

For Petty Officer 2nd Class Robert Greil, the goal was to improve his handling and braking skills.

Greil's wife rides a sport bike as well. His 600cc Suzuki features an airbrushed portrait of their son, Brandon, on its low windshield.

Brandon, who turns 3 next month, already has a toy motorcycle that he pushes himself around on. His parents plan to get him a battery-powered one next year.

Then, someday, his own motorcycle. It will most likely be a sport bike, Greil said.

"He does everything I do now..."

Matthew Jones, (757) 446-2949, matthew.jones@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

Quit complaining and come up with a reasonable solution

I'll start by saying that I've been riding motorcycles for 15 years, and I've owned several sport bikes. I've never had an accident, never put a bike down, and have had some speeding tickets. You can spout all the statistics you want, but the biggest reason sport bikes account for the most accidents is the type of rider attracted to them - young males. Testosterone and horsepower combined with inexperience can end badly. If it weren't motorcycles it would be something else.

For those of you who want to legislate motorcycles out of existence, wake up. That kind of big brother crap will catch up to something you're passionate about eventually. And insurance rates are already sky high on these bikes for full coverage. I'm 33 with a clean driving record (no moving violations in four years), I own a home and am married with children. Still, for full coverage on a new 1,000cc sport bike I would pay ove

Sport Bike rider course

Sports Bike Rider Course won't do one bid of good. These machines that can go 200 MPH will be tested on our highway every chance they get.

No they don't

I worked in insurance for several years(glad thats over). Red cars pay no more for insurance than a white one. It is a myth. Secondly, your liability rates are based on the weight of the vehicle. Unless motorcycles begin to do more damage than cars and trucks, I wouldn't hold my breath for higher rates. I have seen these guys rates get pretty high after a few infractions though. Remember folks, your auto insurance protects others from you, not your personal medical bills. There are a few exceptions but very few.

Hampton Roads residents never stop amazing me!!!

There are so many closed minded, selfish, egotistical people in this area it's pathetic. All this talk about banning motorcycles, forcing high ins rates, banning loud pipes...wow...get a grip people!!! The US is WAY behind the rest of the 'western world' when it comes to MC ownership. In Europe MC's are daily transportation!! Why?? Ridiculously high gas prices!! What's more dangerous, a Ford Expedition or a MC?? The Expedition by far!! That one vehicle has probably killed more people than all the MC's on the road in the US. If you're in one of the 'typical' cages and hit by one of those things, goodbye...Kudos to the USN for trying to improve the MC situation! This training should be required for ALL MC RIDERS, both military and civilian!!

Has to be enforced!

Unfortunately, it doesn't matter what laws are in place, if they are not enforced. I believe the state troopers need to be on I-64 every night. Enough of them, so that one can spot these ignorant persons( in cars and bikes), and one a few miles up to stop them to give them tickets. The reason this article is dealing with the Navy so much, is because recently, there has been quite a few accidents, involving bikes, with Navy personnel on the bikes. I believe in strong monetary punishment, and if the person is in the military, and go through this training, and then the person ignores the training, the commanding officer should take over, after the state finishes with them. The bad apples make it hard on the ones who follow the law. Insurance rates are higher if you have a red car also. When riding, you also need to realize that reaction time is slower on a bike.

BR, I don't believe

BR, I don't believe Marks57720 is serious. No one could be that foolish. Like you pointed out, should we banned everything?!?!?

Why are those motorcycle so loud? So people on cell phone and not paying attention can hear them.

Loud

For those of you who don't like loud pipes. There is a reason for them.

The loud pipes are to get the attention of soccer moms yacking on the cell phone. Kinda think of it as jet-music. You wouldn't know that a Super Hornet was near if you couldn't hear it. You may not like the sound it makes but it got your attention.

And for those that don't get it...

my last paragraph of my previous posting was stated with my tongue firmly in my cheek.

Get over it, motorcycles and inattentive drivers of ALL VEHICLES will not be banned. Everyone needs to keep his/her eyes open and on the road and maybe, just maybe, the roads will be a wee bit safer.

I do like that award-winning definition of PC.

Political Correctness

Ya gotta love them Aggies!!!

The following is the winning entry in an annual contest at Texas A&M University calling for the most appropriate definition of a contemporary term.

This year's term was Political Correctness.

The winner wrote:

"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."

Let's ban stupid people who don't pay attention when they drive (cell phone users, makeup appliers, eaters, drinkers, newspaper readers, GPS users, etc). Take away their license, take away their vehicles (cars, trucks, vans, motorcycles, mopeds, scooters), and make them walk or take the woefully inadequate public transportation

Ban It All

Marks57720, You are right on. Ban Motorcylces. They Scare me too. I am right there with you. Ban everything that is noisy. Ban anything that can crash. Ban airplanes and cars and SUVs. Ban the Pilot, it gave me a paper cut the other day. It should have a warning label or a even better a law aganist it.

I think the goverment should tell us what to do, when to do it, and how to do it. "Not Enough Poltical Correctness in the world." Thats my moto. How about you?

Insurance are already high

Insurance actuaries already put motorcycles at a disadvantage over a car. I pay 30% more than my own car, and I don’t even ride a crotch rocket. As far as the fuel efficiency thing goes, you show me just one mini-van loaded to capacity during morning and evening commute congestion and I will concede to your argument. Bottom line, it’s not the motorcycles that are dangerous, it’s the people who drive in those gas guzzling cages that refuse to pay attention to anything beyond their own noses and egos. As far as loud pipes, when you teach these drivers around here to pay attention and always look before they turn or change lanes, I will put baffles on my pipes. Until then…they keep ME alive from people like YOU.

More

Phrog, sorry but nothing is more fuel efficient than a minivan carrying 8-9 people from point A to point B (try putting 8 people on a motorcycle -- I would love to see that, maybe in some circus act). It's just like trailer homes...we know that they can't survive any kind of wind, but we continue to allow people to live in them.
Motorcycles are inherently unstable...if you lose your balance it's very hard to recover and you know that.
Bottom line: I would rather hit a wall in a car @ 60MPH, then hit the wall in a motorcycle at the same speed...we all know the consequences.
And we're not even talking about the unnecessary noise created by some of those Harley's...noise that would wake the dead...a law should be passed to put mufflers on every one of them (bring them down to acceptable decibels)...but just simply banning them from public roads would solve the problem of deaths, etc. In the meantime, make them pay HIGH insurance rates!

You cannot ban everything

You cannot simply ban everything just because there are people who do not use things the way they are supposed to and it leads to a dangerous situation. If that were the case, alcohol would be banned because of drunk driving, cigarettes would be illegal for health reasons, and ALL vehicles would be banned because people speed and drive recklessly. And how about cell phones? Not just talking on them while driving, but those who are texting while driving? The Navy is doing the right thing by being proactive and getting people to realize that when they are on a bike, their safety has to be priority. I am from New York, and my husband (who is a sailor) purchased his bike there and in order for him to be able to ride his bike to work and get onto the base, he had to complete a mandatory safety class. There also was an insurance incentive to take it as well. I think that if incentives like that are made available, people will utilize it. Face it; no one wants to get onto their motorcycle, regardless of what type it is, and be unsafe.

How about ban All motor vehicles

Marks57720, I cannot believe that you went there. First of all, motorcycles, operated properly, are the most fuel efficient vehicle on the road. What you said is the same as me saying that insurance rates should be jacked up 300% for any car that gets less than 35 mpg. It’s absurd. What causes most of these motorcycle accidents (that is well over 50%) are inattentive car drivers. You know the drill…cell phone use, putting make-up on, distracted by radio/DVD player, etc. Why don’t we ban all those things from cars? Because, again, that is a ridiculous notion. Please exercise some common sense before making statements like that. This about safety, not banning.

Ban them on public roads!

Simply ban motorcycles on the road...restrict them solely to track and off-road events, there are nothing but death traps on public roads! Just like cigarettes...everyone knows your chances of surviving a motorcycle crash on the road is extremely low and yet we allow it...Another option: raise the insurance on motorcycles to sky high levels...that will keep their numbers low.

Cagers + Cell Phone = Accidents

If the number 1 killer for sportbikes (and all motorcyclist) is cars turning in front of them...Than the number 2 killer is the Cagers (Car/SUV Drivers) with a Cell Phone Surgically attached to thier ear as they are oblvious to their surroundings.

Ban the cell phone while driving and the number of accidents of all vehicle types will drop.

Motorcyling in Hampton Roads requires you to ride like your are invisible. No one sees you, with or without the military orange vest. Cagers here simply dont care, run red lights, exit highways from the far left lane, stop in the middle of the highway to catch an exit they missed, etc.

joek

You can't. It's the same with go-karts. Govs are easy to remove.

As for those in defense of the Navy, your right in it is not just the Navy. But face it guys, these bikes are what Camaros were in the 80's. Young sailors are just drawn to them. When the return from their deployments the sales registers start ringing. I am not out to bash the Navy, but you can see by the clothing of many of the riders that they are Navy. Personally, I am glad the Navy is proactively trying to help the boys. At that age I...well, I shouldn't be alive today is what I am saying. You can't ban everything. Hopefully the innocent will not be taken out as a result of guys doing wheelies in the tunnel.

I think the Navy should just set up a way to report transgressors via their palte number. Obviously the police are not going to help.

um, guys...

...the article is about the Navy, so lighten up a bit. It seems perfectly natural to mention sailors when discussing an aritcle about the Navy. Agreed, though, that boneheaded motorcyclists come from all parts of society.

BTW, I respectfully disagree that the percentages of sport bike riders in and out of the military are roughly the same. Young single guys often find themselves with 'creditworthiness' that they didn't have before they joined the military. I don't have a lot of experience with Navy bases, but LOTS of young Soldiers run out and buy sport bikes at their first duty station (THEN they learn to ride them, which is why the Army has been doing this type of training and mentoring for years).

jmo

CG and speed limiter

All sports bikes do have a factory installed speed limiter. It is set at 186mph and the only bikes that can do that are the biggest (hayabusa, ZX14). 600cc's and 1000cc's might do 160mph and 170-180mph respectively. And as far as the CG goes, having a high center of gravity is correct. That is why you put links to raise the rear of the bike for track day duty. Having a low center of gravity for a bike is irrelevant unless you do straight line drag racing. The most important aspect for handling on a bike is how far to the inside of the turn can you put the CG to get the contact patch of your tire to deform correctly and get power to the ground. But the natural gyroscopic effect of the bike wants it to stand up, so saying it falls into turns is not exactly correct.

band this, ban that...

You cannot ban everything! It's not the government's job to protect you from everything. That's what they want you to think and you have fallen for it. "BIG GOV'T SAVE ME. I NEED YOU. TAKE AWAY MY FREEDOM, PLEASE"! The answer is responsibility and accountability of the INDIVIDUAL. I see plenty of balding men in sports cars driving 90+ and weaving in and out of traffic. Soccer moms in mini-vans talking on cell phones are just as bad and more plentiful. I don't own a motorcycle. Not because I'm affraid of other cyclists. I'm affraid of balding men in Corvettes and soccer moms on cell phones in their mini-vans screaming to lil' Timmy's soccer game.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Military Stories

More articles from: Military rss feed    Transportation and Traffic rss feed   


Toolbox