ORV fight is no place for Congress

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

A CONSENT decree establishing protections for vulnerable species of birds and sea turtles on the Outer Banks may need tweaking, but it's a job best left to the National Park Service, islanders and conservationists - not Congress.

On Wednesday, three North Carolina Republicans - U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Dole and Richard Burr, and U.S. Rep. Walter Jones - introduced bills that would scuttle a court agreement reached by environmentalists, a local coalition of off-road vehicle users, federal park officials and others in April.

The agreement, approved by a federal judge, settled a lawsuit filed by the National Audubon Society and the Defenders of Wildlife to set up temporary boundaries around wildlife nesting areas.

Critics contend the new rules are too restrictive; to a degree, they have a point. When U.S. District Judge Terence Boyle signed off on the deal, few anticipated that acts of vandalism would threaten to undermine the fragile compromise.

On separate occasions, someone has knocked down fences and signs around protected areas, triggering automatic expansions of areas off-limits to ORVs and pedestrians. We've argued that those expansions should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

The legislation proposed by Dole, Burr and Jones goes much further - and too far. They're asking for reinstatement of a weaker interim plan that prompted the lawsuit by environmentalists.

The consent decree isn't popular with some island residents and visitors, including people who've engaged in a longstanding Outer Banks tradition of driving up to the shoreline and casting a fishing line. But the boundaries aren't onerous, and they're designed to change as shorebirds and sea turtles come and go.

According to a National Park Service report dated June 5, approximately 12 miles of the Cape Hatteras National Seashore Park were closed because of the consent decree. Another 32 miles were off-limits because of safety or seasonal closures. But ORV drivers still had access to 22 miles, and pedestrians were free to roam roughly 55 miles more, according to the Park Service report.

Environmentalists say they're already seeing benefits. After years of declines in nesting, the number of breeding pairs of piping plovers has increased by at least one and the number of breeding pairs of American oystercatchers has risen by 11.

The restrictions are undoubtedly an inconvenience for people accustomed to driving on the beach nearly anywhere they pleased.

But the facts remain that (1) President Nixon ordered the National Park Service to institute a management plan for off-road vehicles at the seashore park more than 35 years ago, and (2) a long-overdue interim plan, belatedly set in place last summer, was insufficient to protect the park's wildlife.

Under terms of the consent decree, the Park Service has until Dec. 31, 2010, to adopt a long-term management plan. At the agency's Internet site, officials say they hope to work with residents and conservationists to find a way to end "decades of conflict and uncertainty" over ORV use and wildlife management at the park.

It's difficult to envision how Congress could wade into these murky waters and improve the situation.

The legislation introduced Wednesday is a political response to a political controversy. The management plan is better left where Judge Boyle wisely placed it - in the hands of National Park Service scientists, islanders and conservationists.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

More Lack of Homework

Southern_s_1,

You must have learned how to do homework at the same school with the editor.

The REG-NEG committee appointments were made in Dec 07, the first formal meeting held in Jan 08. The request for injunction was filed in the court in Feb 08.

Salvo Jimmy

I agree. Taking the position opposed to common sense and popular views is the only way to keep this paper in print. It is being run like a business, not unlike the Enquirer and similar operations. I'll accept the Sunday edition in my driveway, take out the coupons, and use the rest to line the cat box. BTW, I appreciate all of the hard work, reasearch and information you provide in other, more informed and balanced, forums. Be well.

Bill designed to get votes

Senators Burr and Doyle will need all the political support they can get in the next election. Their bill is designed to get votes.
Environmentalist filled their injunction before their appointment to negotiated rulemaking, which is why DOI has not removed them. Dare County and the others who intervened should have be removed from the negotiated rulemaking process as they have violated the rules of the committee.
OBX current economic state is more a reflection of the national economic state. The business that adapt and educate their customers will end up doing ok. The businesses that don’t are in trouble. OBX currently is a great resort destination with something for everyone. The inaccurate scare tactics by a few make this summer is a great time to buy a home or vacation here.

ORV fight is no place for Congress

We applaud the actions of Senators Burr and Dole and Representative Jones to restore public participation in the effort to establish long-term protection of beach wildlife and reasonable beach access at Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area. Last year, under federal direction, all the parties, including the National Audubon Society and Defenders of Wildlife, agreed to a negotiated rule making process to develop a long-term beach access plan that protected wildlife. Despite their involvement, Defenders and Audubon circumvented the process and filed suit in federal district court to force their solution on all parties. They got an injunction resulting in a consent decree that closed miles of beach to the best surf fishing on the eastern coast. The entire economy of this historic beach community, which depends on tourism and ORV access, is now in danger of collapse.

The federally owned beach

ORV leaders and local Park managers will do well to consider the laws of the land and the mission of the National Parks before they strike a compromise that doesn’t take into consideration non-profit organization like Audubon and DOW constituent’s legitimate concerns. The federally owned beach does not belong to just the local inhabitants and ORV enthusiasts to manage as they see fit. They are responsible for the current situation not the environmental groups.

Editing

The 750 character limit is what is getting us hatterasnc. The editor can spout on for pages but we are limited. The DUMB site does not tell you that you are over the limit on submittal so you have to do a grade school count before submittal.

Probably spaces, even double spaced lines, count.

Commenting on this stuff now almost seems a waste of time because of the space limit.

I'm even wondering if the editor is really "fishing" to keep controversy up and thus readership which probably translates into advertising revenue.

Mr. Schechter

interesting...only dissenting comments are edited. Then again...all comments were dissenting. How many were not approved by "staff"? There were no repeat posters. The comments attached to your flawed opinion piece are some of the most heartfelt and well-reasoned comments ever to be presented on this site. It is truly a shame that you had to go back and edit (censor) these comments.

Congressional Action Required In OBX ORV Fight

You say “It’s a job best left to the NPS, islanders and conservationists.” The congressional bills do that by removing the federal courts from the process.

In 1952, the NPS promised the people of the Outer Banks “there will always be access to the beach.” Now rich environmental groups bring suit to ban people they don’t like. This is about urban aesthetics, not conservation – environmentalists can’t stand SUVs.

If it was about conservation, they would work with the NPS and the island community to build on the decades long successful coexistence of vehicles and wildlife on the beaches of the Outer Banks.

Support S 3113 and HR 6233. Draw a line in the sand before environmentalists commandeer your favorite recreational area as well.

Posting guidelines

We do our best to enforce the 750-character per comment limit.

When a user tries to circumvent that rule by posting multiple, consecutive posts, we remove all but the first post.

Our boards are extremely active and many people want to post their opinion and have it seen.

Please make you point and then allow other users to make theirs.

Once others have had a chance to comment, you can post again or expand on your original post.

Fred Schecker Senior Producer

Interesting...on the way

Interesting...on the way back from the airport this morning at 5:30AM, I discussed with my bride that the Pilot had one last chance to keep my subscription...that there would be a paper in the driveway when we got there. Since:
1. They have proven, as another astute poster pointed out elsewhere, that they will review the preponderance of educated, factual public opinion and take the antithetical view just to generate web traffic and keep interest/advertising,
2. They will not follow an investigative reporter's file of facts (thanks, Cate K...I was wrong in excoriating you) but rather resort to #1 above,
3. The quality of the paper and web stories, in terms of proper grammar, punctuation and sentence structure indicates that they are coming to grips with the least common denominator on hires,
4. (AND MOST IMPORTANTLY) the paper is supposed to hit my driveway before 0530. Tired of throwin

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox