Hampton Roads, VA - 11/08/2009
Clear52°Clear
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Portsmouth proposes to raise lunch cost up to 40 cents

Posted to: Education News Portsmouth

The proposal
Lunch prices would rise to $1.25 next school year and to $1.50 for the 2009- 10 and 2010- 11 school years. The extra money will help pay for rising food costs and new cafeteria equipment.

School lunch prices, 2007-08 and 2008-09
Portsmouth 2007- 08
Elementary school: 85 cents
Middle and high school: 95 cents
Portsmouth proposed 2008- 09
Elementary school: as high as $1.25
Middle and high school: as high as $1.25

Chesapeake 2007- 08
Elementary school: $1.65
Middle and high school: $1.75
Chesapeake 2008- 09
Elementary school: $1.80
Middle and high school: $1.90

Virginia Beach 2007- 08
Elementary school: $1.75
Middle and high school: $1.80
Virginia Beach 2008- 09
Elementary school: $2
Middle and high school: $2

Suffolk 2007- 08 and 2008- 09
Elementary school: $1. 35
Middle and high school: $1.50
* Suffolk lunch prices increased this past school year

Norfolk 2007- 08
Elementary school: $1.10
Middle and high school: $1.25
Norfolk proposed 2008- 09
Elementary school: $1.35
Middle and high school: $1.50

PORTSMOUTH

Superintendent David Stuckwisch wants to raise lunch prices in the city's schools by as much as 40 cents to help pay for rising food costs and new cafeteria equipment.

Under his proposal, lunch prices would rise to $1.25 next school year and to $1.50 for the 2009- 10 and 2010- 11 school years. The proposal comes at a time when most school divisions across South Hampton Roads have already increased their meal prices to cover higher food costs.

School Board members are scheduled to vote on the matter today. They will also decide whether to limit the number of times elementary and pre school students can defer lunch payments. The division has racked up about $260,000 in unpaid lunch fees over the last six years.

Currently, elementary students pay 85 cents and middle and high school students pay 95 cents for lunch. The fees are the lowest in South Hampton Roads. More than 50 percent of Portsmouth's students qualified for free or reduced lunch this past school year.

If board members approve Stuckwisch's proposal to raise lunch prices to help pay for about $1.2 million in cafeteria equipment expenses and higher food costs, the division's lunch prices could still be the lowest in the area.

Milk coolers, ice makers, freezers and refrigerators, among other items, need to be replaced, and some refrigerators, fryers, washers and convection ovens need major repairs, Nita Mensia-Joseph, the division's operations director, wrote in an e-mail.

However, the board could decide to raise lunch fees only to cover higher food expenses and not the cafeteria equipment costs. The increase for students then would be only 15 cents.

Board members are scheduled to decide tonight on whether Portsmouth should limit unpaid food charges. Elementary and pre school students who are required to pay for lunch have been allowed to defer payments when they don't have money.

Portsmouth is the only South Hampton Roads school division to allow the unlimited charges. Other divisions have reported no more than several thousand dollars in unpaid student lunch debt.

Stuckwisch proposes that students be allowed to defer one lunch payment. If they come up short at the checkout again and have not paid the first debt, they would be offered free alternative sandwich meals. Other local divisions provide such meals. Portsmouth school leaders said the free meal should cost the division about 30 cents at most.

Portsmouth Board members Betty Hudgins and Elizabeth Daniels said it's time to ban students from charging their lunches. They're both in favor of increasing the city's lunch prices by as much as 40 cents to cover rising food costs and the cafeteria equipment expenses.

Board member Jean Shackelford said she supports raising lunch prices to $1.25 next school year. But she's not sure she supports raising it again in future school years to $1.50.

Board chairman James Bridgeford said he does not intend to vote in favor of raising fees to help pay for the equipment. But he will vote to limit lunch charges and increase lunch prices to help cover rising food costs.

Cheryl Ross, (757) 446-2443, cheryl.ross@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

pizza hut lunch 5 times a week?

The school menu is not nutrious at all! I care too much about my children's health to allow them to eat these school meals. I prepare my childrens lunch every day aftere they tell me what they would like in their lunch bag. Further more, they carry no money so there's no shake down while in school unless someone actually wants their lunch food and i encourage my children to share what they bring. Not to many want their yogurt or rice cakes and peanut butter, sliced fruit, and bottled water. Yep as a parent I am living up to my responsibility to my own.

who is worse

the kid who charges a lunch and doesnt pay or the kid who eats all year and his parents dont pay a dime?

Let's get real...

...we in Portsmouth are already paying considerably less than the other cities for our kids' lunches. It is time for them to increase....and it's time for Portsmouth to crack down on the deadbeats AND make it easier for parents to find out the balance of their accounts.

Raise the Costs?

By raising the cost of the school lunches the kids already legitimately paying for lunches will have to pay more to cover the debt of the kids who are abusing the "charged" lunches and never paying for the lunches. The school lunch increases should not be the only change to offset the debt incurred by parents purposely sending their kids to school without any lunch money or a brown bag lunch. The alternative lunch or a limit on the charged lunches definitely needs to be put in place. It is once again not fair for hardworking families who pay their taxes and send pay for their kids' lunches to pay for the deadbeats lunches. We are already paying for the food stamps (which should be used to buy PBJ or whatever else for their kids' lunches).

sad

just another instance in which the working community will be charged more while those who sit at home and do nothing will continue to be given handouts financed with our money

Wake Up School Board

Do your job! Raise the prices to match the other localities and provide commensurate lunches/menus. Also, I struggle with your "need" formula if 50% of the kids are eligible for free or reduced meals...Are the proof of incomes based on facts (submission of tax statements) or taken based on a signature; and, are these ever policed (via random checks) for fraud? Lastly, it should be "pay-as-you-eat" and not deferred meal payments...I fed my family first; and, am not interested in feeding deadbeat parent's kids. Those that feel I'm too cold/harsh, feel free to send your payments to the school board to pay for 'em. (My opinion is that there's already enough social programs for the ones who really deserve help.)

free lunches

would the fees have to be raised if those recieving free lunches were to be fed the alternative lunches that were mentioned last week in the story on charged meals? (peanut butter and jelly, or cheese sandwiches)? this would provide a great savings to the city! No child would be left hungry which is the purpose of the program

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Education Stories

More News Stories

More articles from: Education rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox