In pursuit of justice, some opt to do it themselves

Posted to: News Virginia Beach

What’s happening?
Anecdotal evidence shows that a growing group of civil litigants are appearing in courtroom proceedings without attorneys. Court clerks say they are seeing more people filing petitions on their own for name changes and appeals of General District Court decisions and more complicated matters, such as contract disputes and divorces.

What’s the reason?
It could be the tough economy, the many court TV programs or the availability of do-it-yourself Web sites and forms.

What are the downfalls?
It’s not easy. Pro se litigants face tough deadlines and a need to understand what is required in a hearing, such as evidence.

VIRGINIA BEACH

When John McMullen strode into court to challenge the city's participation in the Hampton Roads Transportation Authority, he sat alone at the plaintiff's table.

Rather than spend what he said was a minimum of $200 an hour on attorney fees, McMullen represented himself - and took his chances. After weeks of researching his lawsuit, he presented his argument.

"I thought I was very logical, but you're fighting a big legal clique," said McMullen, a 64-year-old retired naval officer and ship repair executive. "I had the impression as soon as I walked in there I was not going to win."

He was right. He lost, though he spent less than $100 filing the lawsuit.

McMullen is one of a growing group of civil litigants who appear in courtroom proceedings without attorneys.

While circuit court judges say they have not noticed the trend, court clerks say they are seeing more people filing petitions on their own for name changes and appeals of General District Court decisions and more complicated matters, such as contract disputes and divorces.

It could be a function of a tough economy, or the result of gavel-to-gavel coverage on television giving viewers the confidence to take on the system or the creation of do-it-yourself Web sites, which offer downloadable legal forms.

The Virginia Supreme Court has launched a study of why people go "pro se," the legal term for representing yourself, and how the courts can address the challenges that come when nonlawyers argue cases.

"It is becoming a greater problem for the courts and for the people who are looking for justice and can't get an attorney," said Raymond Hartz, executive director for the Legal Aid Society of Eastern Virginia.

"I have probably seen it more in clients who years ago could have afforded an attorney, but because of the cost of attorneys and problems in the economy, are trying to do it without one."

A 2000 survey, the most recent one conducted in Virginia, showed that circuit judges who responded estimated that 10 percent or less of their cases involved the unrepresented.

No statistics are kept on pro se cases. One gauge in Virginia Beach is the rising number of people referred from the Clerk's Office to the Wahab Public Law Library to do research. While it is unknown how many aren't lawyers, an average of 70 to 75 people visit the library in the courthouse daily, said acting law library coordinator Jean Tancredi.

There are no figures on how successful it is to go it alone. Richard Zorza, coordinator of the Self-Represented Litigation Network, a group of organizations that promote access, said it is tough to determine what cases have a better shot at winning. It depends on the merits of a case, he said.

Going alone is not easy. Among the problems pro se litigants face are meeting deadlines and understanding what is required in a hearing, such as presenting evidence.

Chief Circuit Judge Frederick Lowe said one of the most common missteps is that people will try to present hearsay, such as written estimates for damages that have not been authenticated.

"If they don't know the rules," said Tara Casey, director of the Pro Bono Services Program at the University of Richmond School of Law, "they are not able to put on their case, and as a result, the merits of their case would not be argued as effectively."

Doyce Ford, 73, the former pastor of First Colonial Baptist Church, ran into problems when he claimed three years ago that the Police Department and several officers did not protect his rights in a dispute with church members. He said he had an attorney, but having racked up credit card debt, could not afford to continue paying him.

Ford lost. He indicated he would appeal to the Virginia Supreme Court but did not submit the petition in time. The appeal was dismissed last spring.

"I represented myself as well as any mediocre lawyer could," said Ford, who now lives in Verona, north of Staunton. "There was a lot to do. I just did not have a chance."

Duane Bourne, (757) 222-5150, duane.bourne@pilotonline.com



What Do You Call...

....25 lawyers skydiving?

Skeet!

fault

you know something there is a thing called supply and demand,i fault us the consumers for most of the problems with lawyers and their firms.when you make it a business out of other peoples misery though that is disgraceful.it is like any other business they are in it to make a profit.most lawyers have no morals,i can say when i get up in the morning i can look myself in the mirror and know i have worked hard for my money in a decent manner.over the past years the law has been perverted by the love for money and power and nothing else.judges,lawyers,and the likes have made it almost impossible for the common man to defend himself in any court setting,just look at the way legal forms/contracts are worded you need an interpreter just to understand those.they have to justify their own means.

Let's Face It...

Most Americans can see through the phoniness of everything and everyone in everyday life. Thirty years ago most average folks respected doctors, lawyers, teachers, politians and others in formerly higher status professions. Now we're either in these and recognize first hand the corruptness and politics or we have read enough to know the systems are seriously flawed.

D Kent & veryold Are Right

D Kent is right when he says that some pro se litigants can represent themselves as well as most of the mediocre lawyers wandering aimlessly around our local courtrooms. But don't hold your breath waiting for the judges or State Bar to do anything about it. Veryold is right when he says the judges are going to look after the lawyers. The judges and State Bar are going to look after their own - and they seem to be especially protective of the marginal lawyers. After all, if the standards to get a law license are so easy even the morons practicing law could get a license, what does it say about them? They have to protect their phony baloney profession in order to protect their phony baloney jobs.

If you don't think what I say is true, spend several days sitting in a variety of different courtrooms in our region- you will see for yourself how the judges do nothing to set high standards for the lawyers. You'l

and

Judges love to see you represented by a lawyer. Why? because you've employed someone in their profession. You're helping feed and clothe one of their pals. Many years ago I was the defendant in a civil case. Going in to the courtroom counsel told me he thought the odds were "about even" that we would win the case, which we did. I later found out that the judge was my counsel's ex law partner. I doubt if it hurt my case.

Lawyers are great, it you can afford one!

I have to say that I really think the legal profession as a whole is disgraceful. They make the laws in Richmond and make it harder for us to represent ourselves. I'm sick of the TV commercial lawyers and all their pomp and self-importance. For they most part they are leeches and ticks sucking the financial blood out of our society. Let's face it, they provide a much better service if you're white or rich, and they are, as a group, the most corrupt in the country. I had a son that wanted to be a lawyer and I threaten to disown him. He's in IT and can look at himself in the mirror with pride. Then you have wife beating Judges sitting on the bench with no action taken against them. The whole legal business has no credibility; they are all thieves and they are dishonorable. Sit in court someday, you’ll see what I mean, it’s very distasteful


More Stories Like This

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox