78°
forecast

Sen. Webb's new GI Bill gets overwhelming OK in Senate

Posted to: Military

WASHINGTON

The Senate overwhelmingly agreed to a historic new college aid program for veterans last night, capping an 18-month battle to give troops in the war on terror GI Bill benefits comparable to those provided to Americans who fought in World War II.

The 92-6 vote came on legislation that also provides $165 billion to support continued U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and a new round of aid to rebuild Mississippi River levees ravaged by Hurricane Katrina.

The Bush administration requested the war funds more than a year ago, and it had warned that without action soon the Pentagon would have to institute layoffs and shut down some areas in order to divert money to supporting troops in the field.

The vote sends the bill to President Bush, who has pledged to sign it. Passage came hours after Democratic Sen. Jim Webb of Virginia and other GI bill backers, along with a corps of volunteer lobbyists, hailed the program as an overdue signal of the country's appreciation for sacrifices made by troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"This is a new program, a deserved program. Take advantage of it and show us what you can do," Webb urged veterans.

Veterans will not feel the bill's full effect until next year. In the meantime, the Department of Veterans Affairs must overhaul its computer systems to recalculate the aid due each former service member.

As soon as the bill is signed, participants in the current Montgomery GI Bill program will receive a $200-per-month increase in their monthly college aid payment, to about $1,300 for those who served on active duty.

Many will get more aid once the VA fully implements the legislation. The bill guarantees program participants a monthly cost-of-living allowance for their time in college, plus tuition aid equal to the highest in-state tuition in the veteran's state of residence.

Veterans who opt for private colleges, where tuitions typically are higher than at state-supported schools, will qualify for additional aid if the schools agree to match it.

Patrick Campbell, legislative director of the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America, one of dozens of veterans groups that worked on the legislation, said he's been in touch with some private colleges to urge their participation. He said he's gotten no commitments, but administrators at several schools have indicated their desire to boost aid to veterans.

Although the Montgomery GI Bill is restricted to veterans who enrolled when they enlisted and paid $100 per month into the program during their first year of service, the new bill's benefits will be available to everyone serving in the military since Sept. 11, 2001.

The new benefit is expected to cost taxpayers about $51 billion over 10 years, a price the Bush administration initially suggested was exorbitant. The $5 billion average annual cost is equal to about one and one-half months of the cost of the current U.S. military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan, noted Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., one of the bill's high-profile backers.

Bush, who had supported an alternative plan introduced by GOP lawmakers including Sen. John McCain, the party's presumptive presidential nominee, agreed to sign the Webb bill earlier this month. Backers of the legislation accepted a White House demand that the bill allow long-serving vets to transfer some or all of their college aid to their spouses and children.

The transferability provisions are intended to encourage troops to make a career of the military. Even with them, Pentagon officials have warned that the new college aid may encourage troops to leave the military when their enlistments expire.

Webb, who has made the GI bill the central focus of his first 18 months in office, said he expects the enhanced benefits will be rolled back once American troops are no longer involved in combat.

But Campbell said veterans groups expect the new aid will be permanent. Webb's legislation does not carry an expiration date.

Webb's dogged pursuit of the bill's passage earned bipartisan praise Thursday, with his Virginia colleague, Republican John Warner, likening it to the "heroism" Webb displayed as a young Marine lieutenant during the Vietnam War. Webb was awarded the Navy Cross, the service's second-highest honor, in that conflict.

Dale Eisman, (703) 913-9872, dale.eisman@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Posting guidelines

Although we allow multiple posts to individual stories, we enforce the 750-word limit per message.

When users attempt to circumvent that word limit by posting multiple, consecutive messages, we remove all but the first post.

Please respect other users who want to post their opinions as well.

Make your point, allow others to makes theirs, then respond or expand on your point as appropriate.

Fred Schecker Senior Producer

Great bill, fixes VEAP and MGIB.

This was the only shot at fixing VEAP and MGIB inequities while improving recruiting. (For _NON_-MGIB retirees with enough post-9/11 time, you can enroll in the new bill next year. Check it out, Google is your friend.)

Here's a list of orgs supporting the bill. (for those saying it would be bad for retention, note the enlisted organizations in particular!)

Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA)
The Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW)
The American Legion
The Military Officers' Association of America (MOAA)
Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA)
AMVETS
The Air Force Sergeants Association (AFSA)
The Enlisted Association of the National Guard of the United States (EANGUS)

I fully support Mr. Webb!

I am more conservative than liberal, but I am not a Republican. I fully support Mr. Webb, even though I disagree with him on some issues. He is all for the Military and all for the protection of the Second Amendment! To me, that makes up for a lot of the little stuff.

Another loss for right wingnuts

And the losses will keep on mounting with a grand finale in November.

Thank you Sen. Webb. The current administration treats vets like cannon fodder. It's nice to see that change.

Change. What a nice word.

Seriously?

Thinking member of Congress-Drake? Ms. "voted 99% with Bush" Drake- I'll vote no because Bush will veto?

when i came back from vietnam in 1969

and returned to UVa, the monthly GI Bill check was something like $120 per month. No way that came anywhere close to covering tuition, books, room and board.

Well...

"You Webb supporters/libs celebrate; but, for what?"

The troops and veterans seem pretty happy about it. All but waht? 6 people voted against it? Bi-partisan legislation to support those who defend us is liberal?

I am glad I am not one of those stinking liberals you guys talk about. They sound pretty nasty. In fact, a Prius cut me off this morning.

marks57720

"If Obama is your answer to solve our problems, then you must be living in "la la" land."

If you still think Bush walks on water and has been a wonderful president then I question who lives in "la la" land. I'm no Obama supporter and I agree the Democrats did shoot themselves in the foot by not having Hillary as the nominee, but I will never vote for McSame. Obama will be the next president, I hate the thoughts of it, and it may be the first presidential election I don't vote or will use the write in.

Just the beginning

Jim Webb is just getting started. Within a few years in the Senate, he's going to be honed razor-sharp for a run for higher office. I'm just darned thankful that he has committed his energy to the Democratic Party... the party of Inclusion.

Unfair

Although I agree with supporting those in uniform furthering their education with assistance from the governement, what about those that have already served? I served 25 years, as a veteran of Desert Storm and IOF, retiring in 2006. I retired from active duty without a penny to further my education becuase in 1981 I didn't opt for the Vietnam Era GI Bill so wasn't entitled to the MGIB.
I think it so unfair that I can serve 25 years of honorable service and can't afford to go to school but someone can serve for four years today and recieve all the pay and benefits afforded by the U.S. Government. It's just not fair!!!!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features