The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
Think you can't find a parking spot at the Oceanfront?
"You may have us confused with someone else," reads a draft of a new city Web page.
Believe the Virginia Beach Convention Center is for out-of-towners?
"Sorry," the yet-to-be launched site says, "the new convention center is used much more by locals."
Yeah, but we all know the resort strip is for tourists, not Beach denizens. Right?
"This claim is about as ridiculous as a Chihuahua wearing a cardigan," the site retorts.
Sensing a theme here?
Virginia Beach is about to launch an advertising campaign - called the "Gift of Tourism." The idea is to show Beach residents how the tourism industry feeds the city's economy and improves their quality of life.
It's also designed to combat the perception that the Oceanfront, particularly during the summer, is meant to be a tourist-only destination.
The debate - townies versus tourists - is a common one in resort communities across the country, but Beach officials think they can make some headway if they articulate how tourism and convention business brings in cultural activities, more and better restaurants and helps lower taxes.
"We can pinpoint that a whole lot better," said Jim Ricketts, the director of the city's Convention and Visitors Bureau.
The campaign - which is still getting tweaks and could publicly launch next month - is a two-year program that will cost $150,000, said City Manager Jim Spore. Chuck Applebach, the convention bureau's vice president of marketing and strategic partnerships, said he'd like to see the program continue and succeed.
The budget will come from the city's Tourism Growth Investment Fund, an account funded, in part, by amusement, hotel and meals taxes. The campaign's newspaper and radio advertisements will feature disclaimers that they are paid for by that fund, which generates most of its revenue from out-of-towners.
The program will include the Web site - www.giftoftourism.com - dealing with what the city calls "tourism myths." The site, penned in a chatty tone, also will offer links helping locals find restaurants, attractions and events.
"What we find is a lot of time you have people who have a negative view of the Oceanfront, but they haven't been here in years," Councilman John Uhrin said. "The Oceanfront has continually evolved. In my mind, for the better."
Ricketts said the campaign has to give accurate data or it's "spinning a story without anything to say to back it up."
"It behooves us, really, to do a better job getting the information out so the citizens in the community are better informed," Ricketts said. "So they can make decisions. Most reasonable people would say, 'Yeah, the industry is a good industry.' "
The campaign can't be too sunny, some residents say.
"If it's just the good side of it, a lot of people are going to be cynical," said Chandler Scarborough, past president of the Council of Civic Organizations.
"They'll ask, 'What are the pieces you're not telling us?'... The more folks know about it, the better it is. But marketing by definition is selling a specific point of view."
Councilwoman Reba McClanan said the timing is suspicious.
The goal seems to be making residents feel better about investing in tourism just as plans move forward to potentially spend tens of millions of dollars on the development of the old Dome site and the construction of a headquarters hotel for the convention center, she said. "It's almost like it's an afterthought," McClanan said. "Hey, you guys, we decided that, now that we need you all to cough up some money, you need to go along with this. That's one way to do things."
Applebach said the campaign has been under design for months. He said the City Council made communicating the value and benefits of tourism a priority, and this campaign is the implementation of that.
Still, some blowback is to be expected, said Greg Ward, a partner at BCF, the local marketing agency that helped craft the concept.
"With any kind of advertising, it's difficult to please everyone," Ward said. "There's going to be a minority that complain about any message."
Richard Quinn, (757) 222-5119, richard.quinn@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Mr. Barrett and his temper
Mr. Barrett, You state "We have invested private dollars and expect to receive a very good return on our investment. But the point is, much of the infrastructure in the Beach district was constructed in early 1900; it is sadly worn out and needs to be replaced. You and the anti tax zealots at the VBTA have and will scream bloody murder if the infrastructure renovation takes place in conjunction with a new project, even though the new project will create tax revenue that exceeds 15 to 20 times the tax revenue generated on the site today".
I am glad to see that you are investing in the resort area and I hope that your goals of profit are exceeded and never end. The problem is that you expect the taxpayers to enable your development in the form of millions of dollars to improve the infrastructure. Why don't the developers do the improvements under the city guidance and turn it over to the city taxpayers when it is done.
There's something they're not telling us
I have three quick comments about the story:
If you have to explain why doing something is a good idea, perhaps its not.
If tourism is so effective, perhaps the $150K could be better spent by attracting tourists.
Both the Agency (with the campaign) and Mr. Applebach did not address the issue pointed out in the story – the fact locals don’t feel the beach and the so called-improvements are for them.
Based on the above, there’s another issue they’re not telling us about.
Ditto on this:BTW when was
Ditto on this:BTW when was the Constitution revised to include charity, subsidies, health programs, welfare and other human difficulty relief? We should return to our roots within the strict boundaries of the Constitution.
What's new Mike...
He has told you on multiple boards he no longer lives in Sandbridge.
Hey Henry, Where did you go? Answer the questions.
Developer contribution
Well thanks Reid for stating the obvious. As a developer that has invested millions of dollars in the Beach district in recent years, and is investing millions more right now for a new office building, that is exactly what we have done. We have invested private dollars and expect to receive a very good return on our investment. But the point is, much of the infrastructure in the Beach district was constructed in early 1900; it is sadly worn out and needs to be replaced. You and the anti tax zealots at the VBTA have and will scream bloody murder if the infrastructure renovation takes place in conjunction with a new project, even though the new project will create tax revenue that exceeds 15 to 20 times the tax revenue generated on the site today. So save all of us the lecture about public private investment; you will gladly accept revitalization in Sandbridge where you live and call it neighborhood revitalization, but if that happens at the Beach District you call it subsidization of the resort developer. That is a classic double standard, but what else is new from you, Moss, and the VBTA.
Henry R
As you have the podium, why don't you discuss it. Several real issues have been layed at your feet on this thread. Why not address them? The problems at the oceanfront are glaring. One would think having a commitee and all that some of them would be noticed by you all. I mean no disrespect, as I am intrigued by waht your reply may be, but it would appear that this is as I predicted: lip service.
The City Spin
Just because every other mass transit system is a subsidy, there is no need to repeat mistakes. BTW when was the Constitution revised to include charity, subsidies, health programs, welfare and other human difficulty relief? We should return to our roots within the strict boundaries of the Constitution. If Government doesn't want church in government, then why does the government take the job of the church. Charity is the business of churches. Personally, I don't wish to contribute to the support of any person outside of my own family and possibly a friend in need. I am not my neighbors keeper. He can keep himself. I have worked hard and long for every dollar that I have and don't care to be forced to share by the government. This article is about the City spending the taxpayers money that was entrusted to them and that is required to be spent discretely. The spending on misdirection to educate the VB citizen about the gift of tourism is criminal. There is no gift of tourism, only cost to the taxpayer. The gift is to the Hotel and Restaurant Owners.
What A Crock
It seems like every time I turn around the city council is making us pay millions of dollars in taxes to fund corporate "For Profit" hotels like the Hilton at the beach. This dome area project is the same bull. As long as you're charging an arm and a leg for Hampton Roads residents to park at the beach, they are NOT going to take you seriously. I remember when October through April parking used to be free!
What Reid Knows
There isn't a mass transit system in the country that isn't subsidized.
Then, this discussion is supposed to be about the Resort Area and the info program, not mass transit and TOD. It speaks volumes about Reid's TOD paranoia that he goes there.
Anyone want to discuss the program and the Resort Area?
Henry Ryto is wrong-o - again. No surprise there.
hammondjd, You asked what is wrong with focusing development were roads are not needed? Nothing - as long as private enterprise pays for it, not taxpayers. As to Lord Mike Barrett (Runny Meade/Oceanfront Developer)/Henry Ryto's (RAC Man) taxpayer funded TOD dreams, if the private sector wants to develop high density, mixed use future slums and people are dumb enough to pay top dollar for them, fine, but the developers and free loaders like Henry that don't pay the full cost of the mass transit they whine for need to keep their paws out of the taxpayer's pockets. There in lies the problem - local governments in the pockets of developers and free loaders that want others to pay for their taxpayer-subsidized life style. No thanks. BTW, Thanks John for pointing out what a good public service the volunteers from the VBTA are offering our city's taxpayers. No wonder Henry hates the VBTA - he avoids paying taxes like the plague. He prefers to live of OMP.