The Virginian-Pilot
©
The intersection of Holland and South Rosemont roads in Virginia Beach tops the list of crash-prone crossings in South Hampton Roads.
Forty-eight crashes occurred at the intersection in 2007, according to traffic statistics compiled by Beach police.
That's more than at any other crossing in Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, Portsmouth or Suffolk.
In all, more than 27,500 crashes occurred in the five South Hampton Roads cities last year, according to police. Many of the collisions reported to police were at or near intersections, with hundreds being blamed on a variety of bad driving behaviors such as red-light running.
In Chesapeake, two intersections tied for the top spot with 26 each last year: Cedar Road at Dominion Boulevard, and Greenbrier Parkway and Jarman Road.
Portsmouth also had a tie for most crashes: 23 each at Frederick Boulevard at Deep Creek Boulevard, and Victory Boulevard at George Washington Highway.
In Suffolk, the intersection of Constance Road and Main Street was the worst with 18, police in that city said.
Norfolk police said they had 81 calls about crashes at Hampton and Terminal boulevards, but they did not supply numbers of actual accident reports at any intersection.
It was no surprise to Virginia Beach traffic engineer Robert Gey that Holland and South Rosemont was the worst intersection in the Beach, the largest of the five cities.
"It appears that because of the congestion, drivers are taking more and more chances as they're going through this intersection," Gey said. "They're just taking more risk into their hands and they're making more mistakes."
The troubled crossing has a history as one of the city's worst. It was the first of four in the city to have red-light cameras installed in 2004 after crash data showed the need, police said.
The cameras were installed for nine months as part of a pilot program. During that time, the city issued more than 17,300 tickets based on the pictures taken at those four intersections, the city said. While the cameras were in operation at Holland and South Rosemont, the number of red-light violations dropped 70 percent, the city reported.
Since the General Assembly approved use of the devices statewide last year, the city has been planning to reinstall cameras at the intersection and at several others, Gey said.
Until then, he said, the Beach will look for other ways to make crossing Holland and South Rosemont safer. The city could restrict U-turns and left turns on green lights, he said.
"When you have a high level of congestion, you want to get through the intersection quickly, but sometimes the best thing to do is just wait until the next light."
Cindy Clayton, (757) 446-2377, cindy.clayton@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Then upgrade the still
Then upgrade the still cameras to video cameras that run on a continuous loop from different angles. When you are caught the city can send the violator video from many different angles of them running the red light. They could also use the cameras to investigate auto accidents to determine liability.
Red light cameras
Well the legislature has opened Pandora's box. The next thing will be speed cameras. After all, they will use the same argument as they did with the red light cameras. Then it will be GPS tracking devices for vehicles. We're getting just like Great Britian. A land under surveillance. After all it will save liv..well you know. Big brother will get even bigger now. However, part of me would like to see these knuckleheads get photographed and ticketed for driving in the shoulder lanes on I-264 when they are closed.
On the point that red-light
On the point that red-light cameras increase rear-end fender-benders: people driving in such a way that they can't stop when the car in front stops for a red-light just proves the need for red-light cameras. Do you think the second car wasn't planning on following the first through the, um, RED light? The law makes the person who hits a car from behind automatically liable. So this may cost more for a while, but only until people adjust their driving behavior to obey the law (stopping at lights and not tail-gating). Until then, red-light cameras punish TWO dangerous driving practices. And the person who rear-ends another could end up with a far worse penalty (points, increased insurance) than the person who gets a fine based on the red-light camera.
Hello . . .
For those complaining that the tests or underlying data doesn't measure up (using whatever standard), I'm sorry, common sense and using one's brain confirms that red-light runners are a menace. People should be personally responsible for their conduct behind the wheel of a vehicle, period. Very few people run red lights completely accidentally. Most gun for the light and don't care about the consequences.
TO JOANIE
People and cameras are fallible, Joanie. You have a right to question the person who charges you with a crime (including misdemeanor traffic violations) before an impartial arbiter. You also have the right of discovery.
You mistakenly assume that a still photograph can prove more than it actually does. It is merely an indication. There are many plausible circumstances in which a person may appear to have passed a red light who has actually not.
The police, and the city, however, expect the public, and judges, to have the reaction you did which is to accept the notion that the camera, and the person who interprets the evidence, is infallible.
I'm curious . . .
If Florida has already studied accidents before and after the red light cameras, why would Virginia need our own study? Are the roads totally different here or something? Does each state need to study this separately??? Cheers, MGM
Now thats interesting
Trust the HRPDC to publish anything of value? Yea, right.
Worse accidents??
Thank you just_my_opinion for that last article. I was reading through the posts and was wondering when someone would mention that fact. 25% reduction in side/head on impact (which is usually the type to involve fatalities) at the expense of a 15% increase in the fender benders. Majority of the "fender benders" that occur aren't even worthy enough to be called such. Seems like a good trade off to me. Why some people can't seem to understand this is beyond me.
I don't need to spend.....
money on a study when I can sit and WATCH people run red lights. It's a no-brainer to realize their tires, type of vehicle, distance, time of day, position of the moon, hair of the dog, etc., are NOT the contributing factors. People consciously and BLATANTLY run red lights. Some do it over and over and over again. Why? Because they don't get caught!
And how about those who come to a red light at an intersection, are turning right and don't even both to stop?!
Bring on the cameras!
Try the HRPDC website for traffic studies
www.hrpdc.org - they have a ton of good study data you can download.