WASHINGTON
Reports that the United States has agreed to stop shielding employees of Blackwater Worldwide and other American contractors in Iraq from prosecution in Iraqi courts drew little comment Wednesday from the State Department.
"We don't go into detail on the negotiations," said department spokesman Karl Duckworth. The United States is confident that talks on a "status of forces agreement" to cover Americans in Iraq will produce "an arrangement that will be mutually agreeable," he added.
A new agreement is critical to keeping the U.S. effort in Iraq on solid legal footing. American forces operate under a U. N. mandate that will expire in December. American authorities conferred immunity on thousands of U.S. contractors in Iraq beginning in 2004, before Iraq's sovereignty was restored.
The New York Times reported Wednesday that Iraq's foreign minister has told colleagues that a new deal setting ground rules for Americans in Iraq will not provide immunity for security contractors such as those working for Moyock, N.C.-based Blackwater.
Blackwater has hundreds of operatives in Iraq, assigned principally to protect State Department personnel. The company's top executive said last year that Blackwater would protect from Iraqi courts any of its employees accused in the shootings of 17 Iraqi civilians in an incident last year in Baghdad.
Anne Tyrrell, a Blackwater spokeswoman, said Wednesday that the company is waiting to hear from the State Department on any new agreement before commenting on its plans.
Scott Horton, a professor at New York's Hofstra University law school and an international human rights advocate, said that even if a new agreement ended immunity for contractors, the State Department could shield Blackwater employees under provisions of international law that cover diplomatic security personnel.
Horton said that, given the spotty record of Iraq's nascent court system, it would not be surprising if the United States wanted to extend legal safeguards to Americans working in Iraq. U.S. troops and private contractors in many other countries, including South Korea, Germany and Japan, often are protected from courts in those countries under status-of-forces agreements, he noted.
But those Americans remain subject to prosecution in the United States for offenses committed overseas, Horton said. Slow action or inaction by the United States has fueled Iraqi demands that immunity be lifted, he said.
"U.S. prosecutors have failed to use the laws already on the books to prosecute contractors," an Australian investigator alleged in a U.N. report released Monday.
Eugene Fidell, who teaches law at Yale University and is president of the National Institute of Military Justice, said he's doubtful that the State Department could provide diplomatic protections from prosecution to Blackwater employees.
"The Iraqis weren't born yesterday," Fidell said, adding that they are unlikely to agree to such an arrangement.
Fidell said U.S. contractors have a legitimate interest in seeking protections. Iraqis have made tremendous strides, he said, but constructing a criminal justice system in which people can have confidence has proved to be a challenge.
And unless there is some provision to shield American contractors from Iraqi justice, Fidell said, he would expect many companies to pull their workers out of Iraq once the U.N. mandate ends.
The United States employs about 180,000 contractors in Iraq, said Doug Brooks, president of the International Peace Operations Association, a trade group for security contractors. Roughly two-thirds of those people are Iraqi civilians and already subject to Iraqi law, he said, and only a small fraction of the rest are involved in security work.
The United States uses contractors in Iraq for a variety of support missions - such as providing food and housing for American troops - that previously were done by the military.
Congress has been increasingly uneasy about those practices in recent months, with Virginia Sen. Jim Webb prominent among lawmakers demanding that the Bush administration provide more information about its use of contractors.
Kimberly Hunter, a spokeswoman for Webb, confirmed Wednesday that her boss is holding up Senate confirmation of the nominations of four civilian defense officials until he gets more complete answers to queries about a Blackwater training facility in Southern California.
Hunter said Webb wants to know more about Blackwater's role in training American troops.
Blackwater has invited Webb to tour the California facility, The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.
Dale Eisman, (703) 913-9872, dale.eisman@pilotonline.com







Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

Wow!
Carolyn and I never agree. However, when your in a country where just about everybody wants to kill you, there is not much debate on who you want protecting you. The admin would have dropped this hot potato company long ago if the were not effective. Blackwater while being the most recognized isn't even close to being the only company working this angle. The real problem is how you are going to be able to keep replacing the active duty special forces who keep jumping ship. I am not trying to insult the armed forces on the ground there but having foot soldiers protect me as opposed to a force that is truly involved with my security and trained to do so is a no brainer. There's alot to be said about remaining alive.
TR
I have a clue thank you.
The same ROE's that give any opposition they upper hand are the same reason I exited the military. After witnessing what happened on October 23rd 1983 at 06:22 I canceled my reenlistment.
While I agree about the civil war comment the fact our troops hands are tied and somehow humanity is now a part of WAR is the reason things take longer and are more dangerous.
All I know is this...
if I were to be told I was being sent to Iraq, I would be begging and pleading with Blackwater to give me their protection.
While I am from NC, I pay attention to Virginia's delegations and my impression of Sen. Webb is that he is looking for a recognizable name. Blackwater is certainly a medium for him to gain attention. It will be interesting to see how he plays the opportunity afforded him by Blackwater.
Bush is not a Blackwater "bud"?
You really need to get out more.
Anyone interested in just how chummy the bush administration and republicans are with Blackwater should read this:
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/10/02/blackwater_bush/
The use of these hired killers is one of the darker stains on the bush administration.
As usual
Blackwater is not a "bud" of Bushes. Nor do they have the man power to make the difference you infer.
Most of the people who are willing to take this risk, at this level of training are simply no longer willing to work for soldier wages. As anyone who has worked in Iraq who they want working their security detail.
Patriot - get a clue
Bush & Cheney are using our troops as nation-building, civil-war-avoiding policemen. The Sunni awakening council members that we are paying money to & giving weapons to were the same ENEMY that we were FIGHTING a year ago. To borrow your phrase, some stupid (Bush/Cheney) "conservative" did that. Nothing personal, but your moronic WWII comparison is rediculous. There was no civil war among varying religious groups of Japanese that we had to quell. Nor the Germans. One reason Bush farmed out billions to his campaign contributing Blackwater buds is the ability to avoid drawing up required US troops, thereby avoiding more public scrutiny of the quagmire he's created.
hurrah
I like Blackwater, they serve a purpose and if the *war* was in there hands we would have been done by now. I think they should stay and kick backside as much as they can. Good luck and best wishes to all of them.
May end soon??
I should have never been started.
Things like this make me
Things like this make me wonder what we are doing as a country. You hire a man to do a job and when he does that job, you throw him to the dogs.
Blackwater has became the fall guy for the big wig politicians.
Blackwater should pull out of Iraq and leave all of those suit and tie folks to defend themselves.
Hands tied ROE's = death!
The same reasons many leave the military or are killed will now be implemented and imposed on those who have been hired to fill in for our already dwindling young unexperienced military.
Can you imagine if during WWII allied troops had to think and or worry about anything else other than staying alive and killing the enemy! Worried about some stupid (American) liberal wanting to know if you killed the enemy in a humane manner! War and death is not a "HUMANE" activity!
All this will do is raise the cost of these services as the stakes have changed.