71°
forecast

Fraud suspected in wave of voter registrations in region

Posted to: Elections News Virginia

Elections and law enforcement officials are investigating a growing number of potentially fraudulent voter registrations in Hampton Roads, just months before the November elections.

In Hampton, three people already have been charged with voter fraud.

The Norfolk voter registrar has turned over a number of suspicious voter applications to police and prosecutors and continues to flag others. In Virginia Beach, the registrar’s office is examining some questionable applications.

Statewide, 10 localities have reported irregularities to the State Board of Elections.

Republican Party of Virginia Chairman Jeff Frederick on Monday called on Gov. Timothy M. Kaine and Attorney General Bob McDonnell to open a statewide investigation into “what appears to be coordinated and widespread voter fraud activities.”

Hampton police last week charged Brittany Wyatt and Jessica Lemon, both 18-year-olds who live in Newport News, with one count of voter fraud, spokeswoman Cpl. Allison Good said. Anthony House, 22, was charged with four counts of voter fraud.

The three worked for a nonprofit group, Community Voters Project, hired to sign up voters. Employees were required to meet a daily quota of completed applications, Good said.

Information on at least 60 forms has been questioned by officials.

“I encourage people to take voter registration applications seriously,” said Elisa J. Long, general registrar in Norfolk. “Some people treat it like registering to win a car at Wal-Mart.”

“They are legal documents – you can be prosecuted for mishandling them.”

Voter fraud is a felony, and a conviction carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $2,500 fine.

Long said some of the irregularities spotted so far in Norfolk include multiple applications under a single name, applications taken over the phone and applications filled out and signed by someone other than the named registrant.

She said the applications under investigation in Norfolk were also collected by the Community Voters Project.

Frederick said voter registration fraud undermines democratic election principles.

He said the three people charged in Hampton were working for a “front group for a number of left-wing causes.” But Frederick denied any political motivation in calling for an investigation.

“All we’re doing, again, is to try to ensure the integrity of the process,” Frederick said.

Democrat state party chairman C. Richard “Dickie” Cranwell said Virginia does not have widespread voter fraud problems.

“Virginia has had a long, long tradition of a pristine election process,” he said, adding that those who suggest otherwise are “puffing political wares.”

Kaine and McDonnell representatives said the appropriate authorities – the State Board of Elections and local prosecutors – are handling the ongoing investigations.

An alert registrar in Hampton first noticed the discrepancies that were traced back to the three individuals facing charges, State Board of Elections Secretary Mary Rodrigues said.

“The system worked,” she said. “The safeguards are in place.”

Frederick also expressed concern that registration fraud could expose victims to identity theft. The forms require a Social Security number, birth date and address.

“People must exercise extreme caution when putting their private information into the hands of a stranger, for obvious reasons,” he said.

 

Staff writers Julian Walker and Cindy Clayton contributed to this story.

Debbie Messina, (757) 446-2588, debbie.messina@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Mary…

Yes, it is hard, but made even more so when the issue is as politicized as this one is. Voter ID is only burdensome for poor people. Poor people mostly vote Democratic.
We cannot even agree on what kind of machine to vote on in the country. It should be a simple matter to vote electronically with a paper receipt for recounts. But there are powerful people who eschew the paper backup, so it becomes another source of voting fraud.

Len!

How do people without picture ID's get registered to vote in the first place?
Maybe whatever they used then (electric bill? tax bills?) could be used again when they go to vote? I don't know--this is a very hard topic in this age of identity theft. Cheers, MGM

Voting is a right, not a privilege

There are a large number of people (mostly poor, some minorities, many elderly) who don't have the ID structure that most of us have. No driver's license, maybe born at home without proper documentation or that documentation was long ago lost, etc. They probably worked hard, never made much money and live a long ways from State Offices or Registrars and the like. Yet, they are citizens, and probably paid some payroll taxes, sales taxes, income taxes and all the other fees attributed to living here. They have a right, and a responsibility, to vote for someone to represent them in various local, state and federal governments.
Now if we have widespread voter fraud, we need to come up with a solution that is no more onerous for the poor than it is for the rest of us. And that, by the way, should include having elections either on a day off or Saturdays. Right now, working people have an hour or two in the morning and the same after work, whereas the the non-working have all day. Makes no sense.

Supreme Court already ruled

Dannyb, thank you for the link. Upon further research, in April of this year, the US Supreme Court upheld the Voter ID law of Indiana.

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-21.pdf

Justice Stevens (Oh My!) wrote the majority opinion and made some very remarkable statements (section II) that cut to the core of the issue...voter fraud.

I am very impressed with the opinion. Very balanced.

Phrog

I agree but http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,297956,00.html
Supreme Court Will Hear Indiana Voter I.D. Discrimination Case
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
* E-Mail
* Print
* Share:
o Digg
o Facebook
o StumbleUpon
o MySpace
o

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to decide whether voter identification laws unfairly deter the poor and minorities from voting, stepping into a contentious partisan issue in advance of the 2008 elections.

The justices will hear arguments early next year in a challenge to an Indiana law that requires voters to present photo ID before casting their ballots. The state has defended the law as a way to combat voter fraud.

The state Democratic party and civil rights groups complained that the law unfairly targets poor and minority voters, without any evidence that in-person voter fraud exists in Indiana. The party argued that those voters tend to be Democrats.

dannyb

How does presenting a valid identification with proof of registry discriminate? I don't understand the logic in that. If a valid ID and proof of voter registration is presented, then you vote. Period.

Maybe I vote in a precinct that does have that issue.

Only one place to register.

I agree with dannyb.
If you want to get a drivers license you have to go to the DMV. If you want to get a pilots license you have to go to the FAA.
If you want to have the privilege to be a deciding vote for this country's destiny, you go to the registrar. We sure do know how to play fast and loose with how to making voting privileges available. It’s time for integrity in our election system. Show a PICTURE identification with proof of citizenship, it goes into a national database, and – whala – you only register once, you only register if you are a citizen, and you only register when you meet all the criteria. Please spare me of the “voting is a right” argument. Voting is not only a privilege, it is a responsibility and not to be taken lightly. You don’t get behind the wheel of a car and just drive – unless you are properly educated and licensed and know how to drive the car (I know, bad example for around here).

Mr. Brown

I agree 100%, but some say that asking for an ID discriminates against minorities. I'm surprised no one has challenged it here in VA. Though were I vote it is selectively enforced.

How do I expect my leader to act?

Politely say "excuse me" and get out and speak with his advisors to get a grip on the situation. He is not getting clear information when he is reading a children's book. And kiddy is a variation of kiddie.

It's spelled "kiddie"

Oh lord have mercy, here we go...what was Bush supposed to do? Scream and run and scare a bunch of kids? Instead he sat there calmly, as he shoud have, until the information was clear and he could make his exit. What am I saying, of course he can't do anything right, so you same people would've been criticizing him if he flipped out!

That's neither here nor there and has nothing to do with this article anyway. I agree with the poster who wrote about ACORN. Do some research. This story isn't a first...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Elections rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners