The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
Two years ago, Gary Caruana built more than 40 homes in the region. This year, he says, he'll be lucky to get four or five built.
Buyers are wary of buying new homes.
"It takes appointment after appointment after appointment to get them under contract," said Caruana, head of Virginia Beach-based Caruana Homes Inc. and GTC Homes.
And banks are wary of lending to builders.
"It's not a line of business that we're coveting in this environment," said Ben Berry, president and chief executive officer of Gateway Bank & Trust Co., whose parent company is based in Virginia Beach.
The supply of homes for sale continues to mount as jittery buyers nervously watch the economy, the weak housing market, and increasing energy and food prices. Weak consumer demand and concerns about builders' financial health have prompted bankers to tighten lending requirements for homebuilders, making it harder for them to borrow for new lots and construction.
The effects of slack demand and tighter credit have shown up in the subdued pace of building. During the January-through-March quarter, builders took out $190 million of single-family building permits in Hampton Roads - a 27 percent decline from the first quarter of 2007, according to Old Dominion University's Economic Forecasting Project. Second-quarter data is not yet available.
These days, Berry and other bankers want to know much more about the status of a builder's projects, including its inventory of unsold homes and marketing efforts, before extending credit.
"We're continuing to work with our existing customers," Berry said, "but we're not seeking any new relationships" with homebuilders.
The slowdown is apparent in the number of homes being built for Homearama 2008, the Tidewater Builders Association annual showcase. The October show will feature only seven homes in the Ashville Park development in Virginia Beach, down from 17 at last year's show in Chesapeake's Edinburgh Meadows.
Ashville Park is being developed by L.M. Sandler & Sons. The Virginia Beach-based company, which has projects throughout the Southeast and mid-Atlantic regions, has suspended or slowed work on several projects, including some in Hampton Roads.
Ed Sadler, president of the Tidewater Builders Association, acknowledged Thursday that the cost and availability of financing are major concerns for many of the organization's members.
Still, "if a project or a home makes sense, there are lenders available," said Sadler, president of Sadler Building Corp. in Virginia Beach.
Sadler said he expects his company to build 28 to 30 homes this year, an increase of three to five from last year. That's because the company is building some less costly homes, diversifying its mix, he said.
In Hampton Roads, the inventory of unsold homes is less bloated than in severely troubled markets such as California, Nevada and South Florida, Sadler said, because "we did not have the large national developers who put up hundreds and thousands of homes" at the same time.
Still, Hampton Roads did experience a burst of homebuilding activity earlier in the decade, when the combination of low interest rates, government policies encouraging home ownership, and an abundance of mortgage financing fueled a surge of residential construction.
Some of the financial pressure on Hampton Roads' builders springs from those frenzied conditions. Fearful they would run out of lots on which to build, some builders say now that they overpaid for properties that developers made available.
For example, Caruana said he bought 10 lots in the Great Bridge area of Chesapeake in late 2005 for $315,000 apiece despite misgivings about the cost. Several are still vacant, he said, and their values have plunged.
William Brice, president of WATAB Construction Corp. in Norfolk, recalled having the same problem. Some developers, he said, required that builders buy a minimum number of lots, which required taking on additional debt.
"They had us over a barrel, but you had to take it," Brice said.
Some of the region's builders hold out hope that the Housing and Economic Recovery Act that President Bush signed into law Wednesday will spur homebuilding by fostering confidence among consumers.
In addition to supporting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant government-sponsored companies that buy or insure many of the nation's home loans, the mortgage-rescue package provides a tax credit of $7,500 or 10 percent of the purchase price, whichever is less, for first-time homebuyers.
The legislation "will send a message to the consumer who isn't in the homebuying market that a home is still a safe, valid, long-term investment," Sadler predicted.
Meanwhile, Caruana and other veteran builders are resorting to the financial reserves that they accumulated during the recent boom to muddle through the slowdown.
"Builders had a good, strong four or five years," and some put money aside rather than buying new boats and autos, Caruana said.
Tom Shean, (757) 446-2379, tom.shean@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Don't be sad Ethan
So have I. However, those were were poor decisions by the homeowners. All I said was buying is better than renting. I have no advice for the stupid. Alot of properties were(and are) obviously overpriced. It was out of control. There is a large pool of homes out there that current home seekers will find to suite them. Renting is dumb. If someone in the scenario you provided is waiting out the market to buy a 400-700K property for less, this really is not an indication of the general market but an example of someone waiting for an opportunity to take what they want, not need.
Sigh Ira
Well Ira, it sounds like you are in defense of buying.
If you remove emotion and turn to logic, there is a case for both. Current property values are a result of a speculative mania, and will revert to those at which the median income can support. In addition to this, times are changing and we are in a global economy. Part of this is the loss of jobs as corporations find cheaper workforce. So young people have to be prepared to move.
Owning a home has a carrying cost. Mechanical systems, taxes, roofs, pests, etc. It's cheaper to rent from someone who bought pre-bubble than to buy at peak prices. I can lay all this out. I've already seen cases where people have lost $220,000 to $300,000 on home purchases at the $600-700K level. That's a serious amount to loose.
"Primary residence is an
"Primary residence is an expense, not a nest egg."
Your wrong. While it should never be depended on, home ownership is the number 1 way for American families to advance their wealth. Exactly who is it that cannot use the interest deduction on a home mortgage?
While your response didn't really respond, Iwould like to point out that your perception seems to be nothing more than a defense of renting...by a renter. There are very few instances in this country where renting is beneficial in this country. I feel bad for those people who have spent all of these years "waiting" for a buyers market only to find tougher mortgage standards. Your throwing away your money.
Ira Ira IRa
Ira, first, not everyone qualifies to itemize and use the tax deduction. Second, condos are for seniors, I'd *NEVER* buy one unless I was 70. Third, my playstation comment was in regards to the mania that happened last Christmas. It was an example of a speculative mania. People who didn't really want them lined up to buy them for $600, then they tried to sell them for $2000+ to wealthy parents bent on ensuring Snotly jr. gets what he wants for Christmas. Many didn't sell and on Dec 27th they were on Craigslist. No one wanted them after Christmas at high prices, and there was no real use for the system at that time because it was months before good games were released. Replace people in line for a playstation with people in line for a purchase option contract for a Miami condo. Primary residence is an expense, not a nest egg.
Aha, found the pain
Your both dead wrong. You use broad generalizations to paint a false picture. This is a line of thought that will always fail. The tax deduction alone makes renting more expensive. Obviously buying overpriced homes will reduce the ability to build equity but that is due to perception of the market which you all want to disparage. Then Ethan begins bird walking about Playstations and such while admitting he lives in a condo he cannot afford to buy. I assure you renting is not a smart path and never will be. Your reasoning has failed you on this issue. BTW, I am no fan of realtors but dispensing bad economic adive and ignoring fundamentals will not lessen your ire and help you afford the condo you want.
Ira ....
Ira recites the lines of realtors. Your primary residence is always an expense. If I take my rent, multiply it times 120 I get around $145K. This is what my apartment is worth (old metric is 100 months rent = purchase price.) A condo a few doors down, with NO view, with NO parking, lower ceiling, but the lipstick (granite/hardwood/stainless) was on the market for $400,000. I save money by renting. I would buy if prices were logical, and if I knew I was going to remain in the area. For young people, jobs are more volatile than our parents, and owning a house that won't sell without a huge loss can be like an anchor weighing you down. It is generally my goal to try to save $2,000 a month in cash. My frustration is with what I see is the ruining of America, and our gov'ts participation. I think housing is stupid, it's nothing more than $2,000 playstations or beanie babies supposedly worth $5,000. No I'm not t
Ira, what?
Renting vs. buying is a simple decision. If you can rent for significantly less than the price of home ownership and save the difference, it is a very wise thing to do. Buying a house at the very top of the market is practically the definition of "throwing your money away." Renting a modest dwelling and saving will leave you in a far superior position in the long run than overpaying for a house.
And your suggestion that inflation is good for the poor is simply obscene. The poor spend the highest percentage of their income on necessities and are by far the hardest hit when the cost of fuel, housing, food, etc, rises. Inflation saps away the worth of our bank accounts and paychecks, and is no friend of anyone who works for a living.
speaking of housing
I know of a newly renovated condo in OV for $89,500. There is affordable housing out there, but you really have to look.
I Have Absolutely No Pity for the Builders/Developers
They have taken advantage of easy money, gotta-have-it-all-now marketing and compliant politicians for years, and made mega-bucks.
Let them suck it in for a while then return to a more common sense business approach.
I am sorry
I cannot agree w/ Ethan's advice that people should rent. Renting is literally throwing your money away. A large part of the downturn is a result of perception. In fact, people like Ethan are to blame. Sure, things got out of hand and the mortgage industry in particular acted very unethically. However, it is a market cycle w/ a couple of variables. Every one of them has town cryers like him that are bitter over something. I like the guys letters but these diatribes about the economy are fueled on partial facts. Renting is dumb. You are burning money. Those of you who were smart and have low mortgages should be hoping for inflation. It is the enemy of the rich. It will reduce your debt and their worth.