The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine was mum Tuesday as word spread across the nation that Democrat Barack Obama may be on the verge of asking him to run for vice president.
"I'm just not going to talk about my conversations with the campaign," he said in an interview during his monthly appearance on WTOP radio in Washington.
On his way out, he was swarmed by reporters on the sidewalk. "I have not sought it. I'm not running for it. I'm not asking for it," he said.
But Kaine repeatedly declined to say he would turn down an offer to be Obama's running mate. And he refused to guarantee that he will finish his term as governor, which ends in January 2010.
The national media are abuzz this week with reports from unidentified Obama advisers that Kaine is in the final cut of vice presidential candidates with perhaps two or three other Democrats.
The news has triggered debate over what Obama is seeking in a running mate and what Kaine could deliver.
There have been widespread arguments that Obama needs a Washington veteran with deep experience in foreign policy to compensate for perceived weaknesses in his resume. If that's the campaign's thinking, Kaine may come up short compared with two other Democrats prevalently said to be in the running for the No. 2 spot: Sens. Evan Bayh of Indiana and Joe Biden of Delaware.
Conventional wisdom holds that vice presidential candidates are often chosen because they can help their ticket win an important state. If that's correct, Kaine could bring a lot to the table.
Democrats came close to winning the presidency in the last two elections, and Virginia, with 13 electoral votes, went Republican both times. The Obama campaign wants to change that trend this year. It has opened 24 campaign offices across the state and is trying to register young voters and black voters.
"The governor might be able to add a (percentage) point or two to the vote," said Larry Sabato, a University of Virginia political scientist. "Who knows? That might be the difference in Virginia."
Sabato added, however, that vice presidential choices rarely produce votes - with the exception of Democrat Lyndon Johnson, who crucially delivered his home state of Texas to John F. Kennedy in 1960.
"Nobody votes for a vice president," said former Gov. L. Douglas Wilder, a Democrat who now is mayor of Richmond. "The most important thing is that Obama picks someone he's personally comfortable with."
Wilder has long admired Kaine, a former mayor of Richmond. "I was one of the people early on who suggested Tim Kaine be considered" for the vice presidency, he said.
Obama showed similar thinking Sunday when he said he wanted someone who shares his vision of change for Washington.
Kaine is close with Obama personally and philosophically. They're both graduates of Harvard Law School. Their mothers, although they never knew each other, were both born in El Dorado, Kan. Obama helped Kaine's 2005 gubernatorial campaign. Kaine, in early 2007, became one of the first major supporters of Obama's presidential bid.
Privately, several state Democrats wonder whether Kaine brings forward a strong gubernatorial record. He generally receives high marks for intelligence, kindness and his sensitive handling of the 2007 Virginia Tech tragedy, when a gunman killed 32 students and faculty members before committing suicide.
But Kaine's key initiatives have either been killed or gutted by the legislature, including proposals to expand state-sponsored pre-kindergarten classes and to raise taxes to help transportation.
No Virginia governor since 1852 has left office before his term ended, the longest streak in the nation. Kaine's early departure would put Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, a Republican, in charge for the final 14 months of Kaine's term. Bolling would be eligible to run for a full four-year term. This spring, when the tide of Virginia politics was more predictable, Bolling vowed not run for governor in 2010. He announced he would spare the GOP strife by seeking another term in the No. 2 spot, giving Attorney General Bob McDonnell a clear run for the gubernatorial nomination.
A codicil to that pact was never made public, however. The two, according to advisers who asked not to be named, also agreed that should Bolling become governor before the election, McDonnell would defer to him in 2010 and seek a second term as attorney general.
In a video on MSNBC's Web site, Kaine told reporters in Washington he is not distracted by his sudden fame. "I'm still focused on governing Virginia," he said.
Although Obama also was in Washington, Kaine said they had no plans to meet. The governor said he was headed to Chincoteague to watch today's running of the ponies with his 13-year-old daughter, Annella.
Warren Fiske, (804) 697-1565, warren.fiske@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Nope C.B.
Your numbers are incorrect. Besides, a reccesion is a mathmatically provable event. It cannot be argued. While people will try it does not bend the reality of the subject.
However, let's say your right, that the country was in one and we had 2 consecutive quarters of reduced growth. Following the LARGEST ECONOMIC EXPANSION in our history would that be unexpected? Nothing continues to grow at that rate.
your right
well you are right about that gertz,i even heard rumours of another economic stimulous package,a.k.a, govt dependency check,welfare! i wonder where the fed plans on borrowing that money from?china?
there will be higher taxes
It doesn't matter who is elected president we can expect higher taxes, there simply is no way around it. If you take a serious look at our deficit the belt needs to be tightened. If Obama is elected then the Democrats will take the blame for the increse, if McCain is elected then rebubs won't complain about it, but by golly the Democrats will. It's the nature of the beast.
no fan
well i could care less for either party,anymore,and i'm sorry gertz,this mess in our country just did'nt happen when bush took office,this ever downward spiral has been going on for decades,because voter,seem to vote for the lesser of the two evils,and so you always will have a trend,downward!and the snake in the grass politicans,always find there way to DC,,to claim there fortune.on another note,when are you fine people of virginia beach ever going to get rid of your incompitent mayor!
The hand he was dealt?
"The fact remains that Bush could do very little with the hand he was dealt entering his term. That being said, I believe he could have done more to "bail us out" during his terms."
Good lord, look at the spending this man and the repub congress has done. Look at the deficit we have. "I believe he could have done more", heck fire he didn't do anything but make our situation worse.
D and D
They (Omama and Kaine) do remind me of that crazy movie, so Pilot, be so kind as to let this post go through.
For all you folks who are blaming GW for everything from Katrina to Iraq, remember that hurricanes are an act of God (or Nature) whichever you prefer. And how soon we forget, the Iraq war began when the members of the current do nothing Congress voted in favor of the war, and the American publics approval rating was somewhere around 60 pct or higher. But I see the light at the end of the tunnel. And at the end, there stands Omama (oops, misspelled again) and Timmy who will solve everything. Just look at their record, and believe everything they say. The change they seek is currently residing in your pocket.
Okay
"AM and Ira, not to be contentious but GDP data shows that the 3rd and 4th quarters of Clintons last year went down so a recession had been started. " I wasn't sure, but if you checked the GDP data, then I'll bite. I also agree with you on the blaming Clinton or Bush for the recession/s. I also love the fact that people blame the other party for a bad economy and then claim their party was responsible for the good times. The fact remains that Bush could do very little with the hand he was dealt entering his term. That being said, I believe he could have done more to "bail us out" during his terms.
No it happened during Clinton..
AM and Ira, not to be contentious but GDP data shows that the 3rd and 4th quarters of Clintons last year went down so a recession had been started. Of course there are economists that like to argue either way but most will agree recession. Now, was it Clintons or Bushs fault, in my opinion no because it was a long overdue correction of a 10 year economic expansion that started "before" Clinton took office. However, I like to rile liberals who like to claim that Clinton was responsible for the expansion, we were somehow better off because of him and Bush was the bad boy.
Actually CB
I do believe that the recession started in 2001, during Bush's term -- not that I am blaming Bush, as he certainly did not have any control. It's merely a natural economic cycle.
Washington. Jefferson, Lincoln
Good grief how many decades/centuries have we been using the last name of just about everyone including presidents. As far as me refering to Bush as "Mr. President", well, it will be a cold day in you know where. Respect is earned, not handed out on a silver platter. I have no respect for "your mr. president". You call him whateve you want to, the pilot won't let me call him what I want to.