NEWPORT NEWS
Not long ago, the U.S. Maritime Administration had to give millions of dollars to shipyards so they would accept junk vessels and scrap them.
No more.
With scrap-metal markets through the roof, those same yards now are paying the government more and more for those same junk ships, which are loaded with steel, copper, nickel and other recoverable valuables.
On Monday, the federal government announced that four more dinosaurs from the James River Reserve Fleet, or "g host f leet," have been purchased for private disposal and recycling - two for record-setting prices of more than $1.2 million each.
"This is outstanding news," said Sean T. Connaughton, who heads the Maritime Administration, a branch of the U.S. Transportation Department.
Not only is the agency saving taxpayer money this way, Connaughton said, but the James River is getting rid of an environmental threat. In addition to carrying precious metals, the obsolete ships also contain waste oils and fuels, asbestos, mercury, lead and toxic PCBs in their wiring and paint.
If the ships were to break apart in a storm, or if their aging hulls leaked, serious ecological harm could result, officials have said. One recent report suggested that if just one old vessel split open during a hurricane, a 50-mile stretch of the James could be contaminated.
Recognizing the risks, Congress set a September 2006 deadline for the Maritime Administration to dispose of all its obsolete ships at three reserve fleets in Virginia, Texas and California.
Although the agency missed its target date, it has removed more than 70 vessels from the James River since 2001. Fewer than 30 remain.
Of the four ships purchased Monday, one is heading to a local yard for disposal. Bay Bridge Enterprises in Chesapeake paid $1.2 million for the Truckee, a 9,000-ton tanker that has sat idle since 1999 at the Ghost Fleet, located off Fort Eustis in Newport News.
It was the first time the salvage yard on the Elizabeth River has had to pay for a ship, said Rebecca Robinson, a Bay Bridge executive. The company has dismantled a dozen others in recent years, each time with a federal subsidy attached.
"With the metal market the way it is, that's what we have to do to compete," Robinson said. "You have to pay to get ships."
The three other vessels are going to yards in south Texas. The Kalamazoo, another old tanker, was sold for $1.4 million to Esco Marine Inc. in Brownsville, Tex.
Esco Marine also bought the Nitro, a former Navy ammunition ship, for $446,000. The fourth, the Rigel, will be laid to rest at All-Star Metals, another Brownsville yard, which paid $469,000 for the retired freighter.
A year ago, scrap steel was going for less than $350 per ton, according to various Internet sites that track such sales. This month, the average price was $584 per ton, which was down slightly from the June.
The demand for cheaper, recycled steel is driving the market boom, mostly because of the growing economies in India and China, analysts have said.
Bay Bridge Enterprises makes most of its profit from scrap steel, copper and other metals, Robinson said.
Asked whether the yard has more room for reserve ships, Robinson did not blink.
"Oh yeah," she said. "We're a shipbreaker; we'll make room. Especially in these markets."
With the private sector now paying the government for obsolete ships, the amount of taxpayer money being set aside for ship disposal is decreasing.
Congress appropriated $17 million for the Maritime Administration's program this fiscal year, which ends in September. President Bush has asked for $18 million in his next budget, though a Senate committee trimmed that amount to $15 million earlier this month, said Susan Clark, an agency spokeswoman in Washington.
Scott Harper, (757) 446-22340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com






Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

Just an American TJ
Democrat? you must be nuts TJ. Those boats should be retained within the Bay Region to support our labor force and provide much needed steel for local construction projects and related needs. If scrapped outside our area, pre-cleaning of waste from the boats' hulls are released to our waters, impacting our resources not their's. Chances are good, based on history, that if our high quality steel goes overseas, it might come back as screws on advanced guidance system on cruise missles instead of razor blades or hammer-heads. Cheap cross-border labor beats the heck out of our local Bay Region shipyard laborers, well qualified ship builders and breakers, why would anyone want that? The Ghost Fleet must be reduced but at what price locally. Preference should be granted to local Bay Region contractors. What ever happened to Teeside and the four vessel previously sent overseas to that depre
scraped ships
Maybe the transportation dept should dedicate this money for the third crossing and help the taxpayers that already paided for the ships gain some benefit, or maybe put it into the Bridge Budget since a large number of bridges are border line on safety. Then again they could just waste it like goverment does all the time!
Obviously a Democrat
Free market economy is why the ships are being sold to other scrap yards. If our local yards wanted the ships don't you think they would buy them? We shouldn't keep the ships around until the local yards get around to finding the money to buy them. THAT would be an unsound ECO policy that would cause the probability of local contanimation to be much higher. Who cares where the metal is going anyway? Do you really think it's a wise business practice to hold on to inventory until someone in the good ole USA decides to buy it - for potentially less than other countries would pay? As usual, another tree hugger not thinking things through.
Scrap the Vessels in Virginia or Other Bay States
Why do these vessels in the JRRF need to go to other states to be scrapped? There are facilities in all of the Bay states to have this activity performed locally and in a safe and environmentally sensitive manner. The local yard has been accomplishing this task daily with little necessary oversight by regulators, based on their scrap-record so to speak. Are the yards in TX equally as protective in their activites and does that state regularly visit the yards and oversee their operations? With proximity to the southern border, cheap and abundant labor is a competitive threat to our local yards throughout the Bay region. Vessels moved out of the Bay must be cleaned of hull fouling prior to movement. Will MARAD ensure that pollutants generated by this scamping are collected for ligitimate disposal ashore, or allow the debris to disperse in the water and sediments? Is the scrap metal going to U