NOAA goes diving for U-boats in North Carolina

Posted to: Environment News North Carolina

Dave Ball of Minerals Management Service comes up from examining the U-701 wreck Saturday off the coast of North Carolina. (Chris Curry | The Virginian-Pilot)



DIAMOND SHOALS

Deep purple water with streaks of sparkling azure concealed a war grave 110 feet beneath the surface. A vessel plying the waters off the Outer Banks on Saturday was hunting for what was once the hunter, a German submarine sunk 66 years ago by depth charges dropped by an American bomber.

Divers on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's new 41-foot catamaran were geared up and waiting to descend to survey the U-701, the most intact of discovered U-boats sunk off the North Carolina coast.

Boat captain Chad Smith, NOAA's East Coast vessel coordinator, slowed the catamaran's motor and circled the position above where the wreck lay mostly buried on the ocean floor about 22 miles off Avon.

"All right, guys, start moving toward the stern," dive master Tane Casserley said to the five divers. The boat's motor was cut.

"Dive, dive, dive!"

Casserley, a NOAA archaeologist and diver who is serving as the principal co-investigator in the research expedition, watched as the men disappeared under the water. The divers on the vessel were part of a 19-day project to study the U-701 and two other submarine wrecks sunk off the coast in 1942 during the Battle of the Atlantic.

"Ultimately, the goal is to protect all the wrecks around here," said Casserley, the national maritime heritage coordinator for NOAA's Office of the National Marine Sanctuaries. "What we want to stop is the looting and souvenir hunting that goes on."

On their second attempt, the divers, some carrying huge cameras as well as the 120 pounds of tanks on their backs, located the U-701. Visibility was good, they said, but the strong 2-knot current made it a challenge to survey the wreck.

"Everything is on it - all the hatches, everything, " John

McCord, education programs coordinator with the University of North Carolina Coastal Studies Institute, said as he peeled off his diving gear. "I had my feet dug in and I was leaning as far back as I can. Every time I'd sit back and film, it would slowly push me back up."

Exploration of the U-352 off Morehead City began the week of July 7, but four days were lost to bad weather. The U-85 off of Nags Head, as well as the U-701, will be studied this week.

NOAA and partners from the state, the Minerals Management Service, the National Park Service, East Carolina University and the UNC i nstitute have combined their areas of expertise in surveying and photographing the vessels.

"Never has a detailed archaeological survey of the wrecks been done," David Alberg, superintendent of the Monitor National Marine Sanctuary, said in an interview before the expedition. "This is step one. We're not digging, and we're not touching the site."

At least 10 German sailors are believed to be entombed in the U-701. The U-352 also contains war dead. U.S. and international policies prohibit disturbance of maritime graves.

The U-85, the first U-boat submarine sunk in U.S. waters, and the U-352 have been popular recreational diving sites for years; each has been picked clean of artifacts. But until 2004, the U-701 was undisturbed because only one diver knew the coordinates, and he kept them secret.

After Hurricane Isabel partially unburied the submarine, word got out about its location. NOAA worked with other government agencies and members of the diving community to create a diving preserve at the site. Within months, a dive team discovered that numerous parts of the wreck had been stolen.

But still, the U-701 retains much of its original condition, and NOAA has maintained its goal of creating a sanctuary for the wreck.

"This is the one that has the most chance of being preserved and protected for the American public," Casserley said.

The other two submarine sites may also qualify for cultural protection, he said. A goal of the project is to have the wreck sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places as well as to establish diving sanctuaries. There are 14 protected areas in the National Marine Sanctuary System.

"We're not limiting divers by any means," Casserley said. "We want divers to enjoy them. We just don't want them to take anything from them."

Researchers plan to post the data learned from the expedition online, he said. And next year, the expedition will be surveying a yet-to-be-learned number of Allied wrecks sunk in waters off the North Carolina coast.

The project is a significant step in preservation of maritime history and culture, said Joe Hoyt, a maritime archaeologist contractor for NOAA.

"It's one of the closest places where the war came home to America continuously," he said.

"It's really the only place where you can visit the battlefield of the Atlantic."

Catherine Kozak, (252) 441-1711, cate.kozak@pilotonline.com



Significant Cultural Resources

Yes there is no doubt that by any objective measure, WWII U-boat shipwreck sites off the coast of NC are significant historical/cultural resources (unless of course the integrity of the wreck sites has been totally compromised by unauthorized/undocumented looting.

And yes, thankfully, there are objective criteria that the public's stewards of such resources use to make unambiguous determinations of whether the resources are significant and worth preserving/managing or not.

This, in fact, is exactly why government agencies are justified in performing this role, so that management decisions about preservation of resources are not based on the subjective interest/opinions of individuals.

Thank God, Teddy Roosevelt didn't share your views about the proper role of the government w/r/t our heritage resources.

Wreck Divers Chomping at the Bit

Once the GPS coordinates of this site becomes local knowledge (and it will) then the local sport divers (wreckers) will be at it ripping whatever removeable item from it until there's nothing left boat a U-boat carcass. Check out all of the other shipwreck sites along the Atlantic Coast that is reachable by these yahoos and you will get the picture.
Unfortunately you cannot protect these sites from this pack of sports enthusiasts. Dive boat operators are equally to blame since they take the divers to them and allow the salvage activities to take place. Future divers who may have enjoyed visiting these historic wrecks and seeing them in their whole will have to visit Billy Bob's garage or den where most of the artifacts sit s piled up rusting away as the metal oxidizes and deteriorates.

Significant Cultural Resource?

Hey Lucky,

Little touchy there? I just don't consider a 60 year old sunken piece of scrap metal a "significant cultural resource". Let those that went down with the ship stay in peace and leave it alone. We have our own WWII ships and planes laying on the bottom of the Pacific and Atlantic. Are we going to find and protect all those too?

You don't know me so don't assume my political position on any other issue. But please, don't waste my money on something to which 99.999% or more of Americans have no access nor interest.

Dang NOAA!

Curse them for keeping our tidal charts updated and our ship channels properly surveyed. It's such a waste of money to keep track of shifting sandbars, shipwrecks and other obstacles. It's not as if the Coast Guard doesn't have enough to do that they need to take care of those duties also.

NOAA is a bargain for how tight their budget is. Anyone that lives around the coast should be thankful for the work they do.

LOL

We've been fishing on the 85 and the 701 long before it was "discovered"!! LOL
You divers have to learn that there are many more fishermen out there everyday than divers! We also guard our "numbers" to the death at times.

I am jealous.....

I will be down there next week. Will I be able to take a peak?? 110' is a good depth.

Protecting Our Significant Cultural Resources is a Boondoggle?

Oh yeah this NOAA study is a big huge "boondoggle!" So by that logic, I guess the National Park Service, the National Register of Historic Places, the National Historic Landmarks system, and anything else the government does to protect our significant historic sites and cultural resources are also just a huge waste of tax dollars. LOFL!

So, what's a justified expenditure of federal tax dollars, then; a defense budget for this war of choice in Iraq that is kept out of the federal budget w/ no accountability? No-bid contracts for billions of dollars to the friends and business associates of the current administration? Gimme a break.

True

True, I can see it being some college project... locate wrecks, survey them, publish them. But I dunno about the gov't. I was looking into the homebrew sidescan sonar projects last weekend. I support NOAA and NASA in research on global climate change and monitoring conditions of water and habitat, but wreck searches seem a bit odd. Sounds like fun though! Heck, if taxpayers are funding it why bother with "120 pounds of tanks" and move to a CCR (unless they are, and it's bailout/deco).

I'm sure the NOAA divers are

I'm sure the NOAA divers are enjoying their diving off of their NEW catamaran. I am unsure however, why my tax money is being spent on this boondoggle! Can you say "government waste"?


More Stories Like This

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox