The Virginian-Pilot
©
More than one-fourth of the region’s bridges are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, some of the worst concentrated in Chesapeake and Southampton County, according to a report released Wednesday. Of 1,237 bridges, 338 are either in need of repairs or don’t meet modern standards.
Transportation experts stress that the ratings do not necessarily mean the bridges are unsafe. The study also states that Hampton Roads fares better than the state and the nation in terms of percentage of deficient bridges.
The study, conducted by the Hampton Roads Planning District Commission, is the first comprehensive bridge study in the region and examines bridges owned by localities as well as the state, executive director Dwight Farmer said. In September, the commission will release more specifics about its findings and recommendations.
The Virginia Department of Transportation has conducted separate studies and rankings of its bridges.
According to the commission’s report, the worst bridges are deficient – meaning their structure needs to be regularly monitored, inspected and maintained. Fifty-four bridges fall into this category, and 25 are in Chesapeake and Southampton County. They include the Gilmerton, Jordan and 22nd Street bridges.
Norfolk has the greatest number of obsolete bridges at 74. Obsolete means that bridges don’t meet modern standards because they don’t have adequate lane or shoulder widths, or adequate vertical clearances.
All of the state’s bridges are inspected at least every other year. Some are inspected more frequently based on their condition or design, said Camelia Ravanbakht, the commission’s principal transportation engineer . Bridge inspectors close or impose weight limits on unsafe bridges, she added.
The commission began studying local bridges last year at the request of Chesapeake.
“We knew we had a bridge issue here,” said Earl Sorey, Chesapeake’s acting city engineer.
The report will help city leaders prioritize Chesapeake’s bridge needs, he said. The city has 160 bridges, 90 of which are operated and maintained by the city, he said. The majority are owned by VDOT, he said.
The city’s done a good job of maintaining smaller bridges, but the larger bridges require federal, state and local money, Sorey said. The Gilmerton Bridge is scheduled for a $154 million makeover. The project will be advertised next February, and construction will take about three years, he said.
John Keifer, director of public works for Norfolk, disputed the commission’s report, saying the city maintains 50 bridges. Half are rated in good condition, 24 are fair and only one is “poor or worse,” he said. That bridge, he said, is a culvert on Granby Street near Bayview Boulevard. It will be replaced this year.
According to the report, while 4.4 percent of the region’s bridges are classified as deficient, 9 percent of the bridges in Virginia and 12 percent of the bridges in the United States have deficient ratings.
The deficient and obsolete bridges represent 27.3 percent of all Hampton Roads bridges. By comparison, the report indicates 26 percent of Virginia bridges and 25 percent of U.S. bridges meet the criteria.

Staff writer Harry Minium and news researcher Jakon Hays contributed to this report.
Debbie Messina, (757) 446-2588, debbie.messina@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Do you know the history of the Kings Highway bridge Roger?
Quote "In Suffolk our council was asleep at the switch and VDOT took away our Kings Highway Bridge, without any replacement..."
Very good example of what we need to do now. Had it not been for private business the Kings Highway Bridge would never have existed. That's right, the KHB was built with private funds and then tolled. Just as we could be doing now on a grander scale. Shame the Democrats in this area just don't get it as in free markets and democracy vs socialism. See what happens to an asset when it becomes government controlled? Not run like a business.
structurally deficient?!?!
Transportation experts stress that the ratings do not necessarily mean the bridges are unsafe.
Then what the HELL does that mean, structurally deficient? They're playing politics with our lives!
And I'd settle for them to clean the High Rise Bridge; that thing is LOADED with a junckyard's worth of debris...
Not on your life
jkbrent: "Kaine and his predecessors have already raided VDOT money for non-transportation related projects. Do you honestly think that new taxes would go only to roads?" - Nope. And that's why I don't support new taxes to fund transportation. Our taxes should ALREADY be going to fund transportation. As well as Education and our public safety services. And by education, I mean the public schools and colleges. Not the tons of special projects out there. It's a sad thing, but special projects need to be cut back or consolidated. It's not easy to make those tough decisions, but the condition of our highways/bridges is deplorable and that affects everyone, not just a portion of the population. In trying to spread the budget $ around and keep everyone happy, he is spreading too thin. Gov Kaine: old addage; You can please some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but
Barges hit lesner bridge fenders
Plan on the Lesner to be the first bridge to collapse and kill everyone on it. If the city allows barges in the Lynnhaven Inelet to clear the spoils for the priveleged waterfront owners in the south end via a boat ramp and through these currents... whats the chance,,, uhhhh lets see 100% a barge power never breaking down, high winds, swift tides...the list goes on. the bridge is being fixed now from a barge navigating under this bridge and no small craft advisory was issued that day. The city of VB says that any dredge and barge operations are at the discretion of the contractors doing the work. lets see... aren't contractors at the top of the BBB cpmplaint list or did they move to second to used car sales. The issue of the Inlet being used for barge traffic has nothing to do with safety. It is merely a favor owed to wealthy waterfront owners by their elected concilman.
RE: IT IS FASCINATING HOW ONES
Where I'm coming from is Northern Virginia. An area where roads became parking lots twice day before I-44 Toll Road was even a thought. I don't like the mess anymore than you do. But, I also know that if this state has Billions to give away to overpaid colleges, then it has a few hundred million to spend on these roads without picking my pocket or yours. Kaine and his predecessors have already raided VDOT money for non-transportation related projects. Do you honestly think that new taxes would go only to roads?
Re: Roger Leonard
I agree with you completely: your bridge is but one. Whose vital bridge is going to be next? It is past time to stop talking and get repairs or replacements built before we have a serious disaster on our hands. What I fear is the engineers understating the cases instead of overstating them. There are bridges in this area I go out of my way to avoid: the Jordan and Gilmerton are but two of them. Waiting is only going to make them worse and increase the chances of people getting hurt or even killed.
lobbyist?
Mike Barrett said "They have turned a blind eye toward the needed funding increases necessary to pay for maintenance and repair."
So says our resident lobbyist for the highway construction industry.
(HINT: Fixing bridges wont get you higher occupancy rates. You want MORE roads, remember??)
jmo
At least you have a bridge
In Suffolk our council was asleep at the switch and VDOT took away our Kings Highway Bridge, without any replacement...
VDOT did not maitain the bridge when it was their responsibility and when the City took over Road Maintenace a few years ago, due to past mistakes by the City to hold VDOT accountable, the bridge was demolished. Just last week the MPO took the bridge replacement off the transportation plan and the last of the funds for this bridge replacement were taken away for other projects. Our Mayor and City Council really have no plan on how to pay for a new bridge and we all are driving around an eighteen mile deture. This works out to a five dollar toll (more than one gallon of fuel per car) each way... On top of this, there seems to be a well-connected group who just do not want a bridge in their back yards.
As a result, this vital bridge that connects our community is now gone and looks like it ju
Apparently
we are going to wait until something fails before we address the transportation issue. Then the public will be crying about the inaction of our general assembly, demanding to know why something wasn't done sooner.
The image of the majority
The image of the majority leader and the Speaker in the House of Delegates, celebrating because they had defeated the Governor's attempt to fund maintenance and construction for local roads, is the best reason why our once efficient and effective transportation is now actually deteriorating rapidly. They have turned a blind eye toward the needed funding increases necessary to pay for maintenance and repair. Their intrasigence is because the republicans have signed to No New Taxes pledge required by Grover Norquist. Frankly, I don't feel that I have a representative in the House of Delegates; our Hampton Roads Republican delegation indicated they got the issue, but under pressure from the Majority Leader and the Speaker, they wilted like flowers in the hot sun. I want to be repesented, and will work hard to ensure we get Delegates who will do their duty to me, not to Grover Norquist.