Two sides of the gun issue played themselves out in stark contrast in our region within days. We saw gunfire devastate the family of an 18-year-old Oscar Smith High School graduate, who was found on a Chesapeake lawn. We witnessed the heroic actions of a pizza owner in Virginia Beach who killed a suspected robber, saving himself and his employees.
Both incidents followed the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in a Second Amendment case last week. That decision safeguards an individual’s right to own a gun for personal use. The ruling was cheered by gun owners, and lamented by increasingly impotent gun-control activists.
Many people will see, in the shootings here, an unimpeachable rationale for arming ourselves. Because of people like the 17-year-old suspect in the death of football star Lonnie Andrews Jr., and the 41-year-old man who tried to rob Dominick’s Pizza and Pasta, gun activists argue that Americans will be safe only if they have their own piece.
We’re deceiving ourselves if we think the opportunity to prevent crime will come as efficiently as restaurant owner Ferdinando Abbondante dispatched the threat he faced Saturday night. Think about this: When was the last time a store owner, restaurateur, customer, average citizen did that in the region?
Now answer this: When was the last time someone was killed by gunfire in the region? Just days. As I write this, Chesapeake police are investigating another death that occurred the same day that Andrews, who was headed for Virginia State University on a football scholarship, was cut down. On Wednesday, a 34-year-old man was found shot to death in a car in Portsmouth, and a 19-year-old man was shot and killed in Hampton.
I’ve seen an array of articles, opinions and statistics on guns and gun crimes in the days since the high court’s landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller. Most people seem so set in their views that it often seems pointless to delve into the topic.
However, there should be some points that Americans can agree on, and tackle, in the wake of the court ruling and the continuing body count on the nation’s streets:
-- Guns aren’t going anywhere. The United States has an estimated 283 million handguns, shotguns, rifles and other long guns . That’s roughly one for every man, woman and child in the country. More time and effort should be spent on keeping guns out of the hands of known criminals, but because illegal sales seem to be as easy as buying bottled water, that’s extremely difficult. And access to guns can make an ordinary argument tragic.
-- Most gun-related deaths involve suicides. According to published reports and federal statistics, for the five years ending in 1997, an average of 36,000 firearm-related killings occurred annually. Roughly 51 percent were suicides, and 44 percent were homicides. More effort needs to be taken to keep those with mental problems, including depression, away from firearms. We witnessed the horrific consequences of that last year in the Virginia Tech killings.
-- Because guns are so prevalent, they are a ready tool for criminals, in both killings and other felonies. In 2005, according to federal statistics, handguns were used in 8,478 homicides; other types of guns were used in 2,868 homicides.
-- Even when adults have loaded guns for protection in the home, accidents can happen when children find them, or a disgruntled spouse can use them as a weapon.
-- Federal statistics from the mid-1990s showed that 211,000 handguns and 382,000 long guns were stolen in noncommercial thefts in just one year.
-- Can firearms prevent attacks? Definitely. A much-quoted study by professors Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz from the mid-1990s indicates that “defensive gun uses” number as many as 2.5 million times a year. Other studies have questioned the statistics, and because actual defensive uses are not reported as frequently as shootings, homicides and other assaults, the estimate remains controversial.
Reading the statistics and weighing the odds, it seems clear that guns cause more mayhem than they offer protection to the average citizen. We also know that guns are so ingrained in our culture that they’re here to stay. Everyone should be honest about those realities.
After all, tens of thousands more die every year by gunfire in the U.S. than the number of U.S. troops killed since the start of the Iraq conflict. You could say Americans are fighting another major war, right here at home.
Roger Chesley is associate editor of The Pilot’s editorial page. Reach him at (757) 446-2329 or at roger.chesley@pilotonline.com.





Roger Chesley
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

One can only hope
That the criminals in our midst are engaged in the same hand-wringing agonized debate over whether or not they should have the right to bear arms... oh wait thats only us, the average law-abiding citizens, that are constantly being assailed with this rhetoric. It is our right to bear arms in this country, and to defend ourselves and our loved ones. Period. Criminals caught with firearms should be severely punished. They have forfeited their right to own or use guns, a right that we law-abiding citizens still retain.
We don't need gun control, we need CRIMINAL control
While you're digging up stats, how about digging up something on how many CRIMINALS, who have already been convicted of CRIME, often of violent crime, are out on the streets because they rarely get what they deserve for their actions. We like to talk tough about crime, but we don't want to get tough on it because that means admitting that there is an entire subculture in our country who feel that they can (and should be permitted to) do literally anything that pops into their minds, and there should never be a consequence. Let's see, most of these criminals live in public housing, trailer parks, or Section 8, so they don't see a positive example to follow, and since they don't work or go to school, they have plenty of time to rob, sell drugs, commit burlary and larceny, and stand around making the area they're in look bad. But if you call them what they are, CRIMINALS, you're insensitive. Well, call me insensitive then, because I want them in prison where I don't have to worry about them having a gun.
Probably not
The 17 year old didn't have a legan gun in his name, but if he got it from a legal gun owner that that persons should also be punished. The problem is irresponsible people own guns as well as responsible ones.
More gun laws?
Do you think the 17 year old, purchased his gun legally, or took a gun safety class, or had a conceal carry permit? or did he steal it, or take it from a friend or family member? If someone wants to kill someone, they aren't worried about violating a gun law. Last I heard murder was illegal.
What gun rights did Virginians get?
What right did Virginians get after the Supreme Court decision granting the people of D.C. the right to own a gun to protect their home? VA already had that right, but for some reason gun advocates seem to think they were granted additional rights. Which isn't true. I'm not trying to take away your right to own a gun, but I am firm in my thinking that we need better gun control laws. Guns need to be registered/ licensed and re-registered every so often. Waiting periods should be strickly enforced for any gun of any caliber. This very weekend, guns are being sold at estate sales, antique shops, and auction houses. This needs to be against the law and stopped. If you want to purchase a gun then you must get it from a licensed dealer. I'm also infavor of a national data base on every gun of evey type and every caliber. Crimes involving a gun should be harshly punished. If the gun involved is illegal then the
What part of Right do you fail to understand?
Roger, I am sorry you don't appear to like the fact that as American citizens we have a Constitutional right to bear and keep arms. I am sorry you feel your views are more important than the rights we have been endowed with by our Creator. You pointed out that recently some local folks have been killed by use of hand guns. Were those deaths at the hands of criminals that killed innocent, unarmed citizens? No matter how many restrictions are placed on hand guns, those restrictions are largely meaningless to criminals’ intent to use weapons to rob and kill their victims. Each of us has a need to defend ourselves from armed criminals. To advocate that law abiding citizens must be prevented from their right to bear and keep arms is to advocate that criminals will have total impunity to rob and victimize law abiding citizens without fear of having armed citizens level the playing field and defend them