Letters to Editor - bLetters

We welcome your opinion on public issues, in either of two ways. You can submit a letter to the editor for possible publication in the printed edition. The Virginian-Pilot welcomes letters to the editor on all topics, although concise letters (150 words or less) on public issues will receive priority. Letters may be edited for length, style and clarity and writers are limited to one published letter every month. Please add your name, city, street address and daytime telephone number for confirmation.

The other way is to comment on the published letters in this blog. In this online forum, you can comment as much as you want by using the comment box at the end of each entry.

By e-mail: letters@pilotonline.com

By mail: Letters to the editor - P.O. Box 449 - Norfolk, VA 23501-0449

By fax: (757) 446-2051



Rights of reporters Is this the paper of editors Lenoir Chambers and Louis Jaffee? They must be spinning in their graves. Just opposite the stated ideal of Frank Batten, 'Our duty is clear: It is to serve the public with skill and character, and to exercise First Amendment freedoms with vigor and responsibility,' is your Public Editor's report ('Newsroom faces stricter rules on campaigns,' Aug. 10) vindicating a decision that those same freedoms will now be denied by the paper to certain of its employees. This is 'skill' and 'character'?

This is 'vigor' misdirected and 'responsibility' strangely interpreted. The paper's 'ethics committee' might try to find a more appropriate name for itself. The ACLU must already be getting calls.

Rick Hite
Norfolk

ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules. Comments do not reflect the views or approval of The Virginian-Pilot or this Web site. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment to alert an editor. Repeat offenders will be denied automatic posting privileges.


The problem

The problem is that one man's "truth", is another man's "lie". The problem is in the interpretation and the interpreter.

Left Field

When I read or hear that restrictions are going to be placed on what the media may or may not say, you can bet your last dollar they are trying to shut down the truth detectors. If you think not then what would be a reason for such action? If you report or comment on the truth (or lies) isn't that what freedom of the press is all about anyway?

Jim King