68°
forecast

Actions over free expression cast Norfolk in provincial light

Posted to: Kerry Dougherty Opinion

Far be it from me to alarm anyone, but we in Southeastern Virginia are beginning to look like a bunch of cretins.

Let's recap.

In April, there was that embarrassing dust-up over The Virginian-Pilot's Student Gallery. You remember. First place was supposed to go to a student who entered a nude self-portrait. Then newspaper honchos intervened and decreed that a naked teenager wouldn't be honored in the winner's circle.

A new judge was summoned, and he selected a nude sculpture.

More nekkid art, No way. Eventually, Pilot staffers were forced to judge their own contest, and the student award went to a modest piece. Not our proudest moment here at the defender of free expression.

Two months later, it was the city of Norfolk's turn to look provincial when a foul-mouthed rapper who performed at the Bayou Boogaloo and Cajun Food Festival cussed on stage - gosh, who could have predicted that? Indignant festival organizers demanded that the police charge the guy with a crime.

To no one's surprise, the profanity case against Raymond "Boots" Riley was dismissed. Seems the First Amendment is still in effect. Even in Norfolk.

Now the city's back in the news - from Philadelphia to Germany, according to a perusal of the Internet - because an art gallery owner at the Waterside Festival Marketplace was asked to move a nude art work from a window to a less conspicuous spot.

Seems a local prude spied a bosom in the window of the Mayer Fine Art gallery and swooned. A complaint was lodged with Waterside management. Action was taken.

Gallery owner Sheila Giolitti - who said there was no less prominent place to display such a large piece - succumbed to this spirit of Puritanism and slapped paper-plate pasties on the offending naughty bits.

For those who haven't peeked behind the plates, the pastel breasts are hardly erotic. One is so small it could belong to a man. The other is considerably bigger.

When I caught up with her Friday, artist Erika Risko explained that there's a reason for this lopsidedness.

The work, titled "Martyrdom," was her art school thesis. It's a composite piece, she said, that embodies the likenesses of four strong women who overcame tremendous hardships in their lives.

Risko said one of the models is a close friend who suffers from brittle bone disease. Another is a woman who endured an abusive situation. There's also Risko's sister, who has struggled with autism, and an aunt who lost a child.

I wonder if the Waterside whiner is ashamed of herself now.

The young artist has been kept abreast of the controversy and finds it hilarious.

"It's the silliest thing I ever heard," she said. "Life drawing is such a part of art."

Risko, a senior at the Moore College of Art & Design in Philadelphia, seemed awfully nice. I had to ask.

Have you ever been to Norfolk?

"Nope, never," she replied.

Would you like to visit?

"No," she said, flatly.

I felt like a cretin for even asking.

Kerry Dougherty, (757) 446-2306, kerry.dougherty@cox.net

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Mary... I Agree With You 100%... [Pt. 1]

I applaud your insight, strength of character & commitment to living within the tenets of your faith. In engaging & educating your children in a thoughtful & pricipled manner, you are giving them the appropriate tools & action plans so that they feel no need to participate in the behaviors & mores that are outside the realms of your faith. When those children grow to adulthood, their presence in society will begin to elevate society's behavioral & moral expectations.

Your choice of approach effects a more positive change towards the 'lack of civility' in our society, than those who pontificate that society is "wrong" & must submit itself to being censured & censored.

I stand by my previous comment about choice: "Our choice then, is limited to how we react as individuals, to the values & behaviors which discomfit us. We are still free to act as thoughtful, principled & honorable beings, if w

There's a huge difference between crudity and art!

I too belong to a conservative church. I have great kids who are respectful, polite, intelligent, active in the church, and excellent scholars and athletes. We eschew several radio stations because of crude lyrics, are picky about the movies they watch, and the people with whom they associate.

However, I did't find anything offensive about the art in question and would not have a problem with my daughters seeing it or other portrayals of the human body in an artistic form. I think we are all smart enough to differentiate between art and porn; appropriatee and inappropriate.

It's okay to make Mayberry comments . . .

I do not apologize for my distaste with how *crude* our society has gotten. And, yes, my teenager has *slowly*, while talking and dialoging with his parents, become aware of that very crudity around us. He knows how to identify it and he knows that he can choose an alternative to it. I think that comforts me the most. That my son knows an alternative exists and will often choose it over today's "cool" mores. Yes, we may seem "Mayberry" (along with the people of all races who surround us at our conservative church). Laugh at us, if that is the price we pay to not subscribe to "lowest common denominator" tactics in our society. Cheers, MGM

Shucks Andy!!! [ Cue The Whistling Theme Music]...

Could it be, that Mar Sch7 & the good Dr. Tabor are advocates for a return to that kindest, gentlest, "Golden Age of America," the 1950's?

When erudite middle class American parents like Ozzie & Harriet Nelson, and Ward & June Cleaver, always knew best. And children were well mannered & always answered their elders with a polite ‘yes Sir’ or ‘no Ma’am.’ Where youngsters were eager to occupy themselves with adult supervised, structured activities, like Boy Scouts or Girl Guides, Music Lessons, Little League, 4-H Club & Summer Camp. When Sundays were always observed as family time, & Sunday morning Church services were dutifully attended, followed by Bible School, & then straight back home to help Mom prepare Sunday Dinner.

No rampant crime, no illicit drugs, no gangs, no assaults or shootings, no wanton, brazen, sexual images to subvert the clean, upstanding, moral fiber & chastity of our youth... Well... Maybe in the ‘bigger cities,’ like New York, or Boston, or Los Angeles, but certainly not here in Mayberry!!!

RE: Scolds

Now just one minute. By some standards I'm an elder, but I don't wear a diaper. As far as whining about this piece of art that someone thinks is bad for their children, then perisonally I think they are crazy. If you can't talk to your children about art and or breast, they you have a problem, and your children will grow up with bigger problems. Stop the censorship, and stop the whining.

Scolds

Kerry has it right IMO. The area is full of scolds and diaper-wearing, arrogant, cowardly elderly who behave like the common scolds of old. These elderly have nothing better to do in retirement that to nick pick at there neighbors for any and all perceived transgressions as well as scream foul if any 19th century-era moral or ethic has been violated. In my community I have several dozen retiree scolds who scream for an attorney the instant that some dog owner doesn't pick up the poop, some young child innocently tosses a few peices of popcorn to a neghborhood duck, or if someone parks on 'their' side of the street. How childish. Instead of talking to the neighbor, they get the police, hire an attorney, and gossip the entire time slandering people's reputation without cause. I've heard it said that life comes back full circle. The elderly these days are returning to their own childhood personalities. Probably as a result of living longer these days, I guess.

exaggeration

I said: "I'm truly sorry that a breast is too much for some to handle...or if it's uncomfortable for some to explain to a child just what a breast is. Or what art is. Sorry that some are so repressed as to find the human body offensive."

I stand by that statement. Some people are uncomfortable seeing a breast, so they complain and it gets covered up. Some people would rather not explain to the child what it is they are looking at. Some people actually do believe that the human body is offensive and should always be covered. Do you dispute this?

Sarcasm aside, in my opinion this perfectly decsribes the kind of repressed person that would complain about seeing a boob in a painting.

jmo

Umm, you did forget rather quickly

This is about exposed breasts in a work of art. Someone was offended because little johnny (julie?) saw a boob. Boobs were covered. Prude wins. Gallery owner loses. Mall owner loses. General public loses.

When did this become about music? Foul language? Why are you changing the subject? What other reason would you object to the artistic interpretation of a breast if it didn't offend you?

BTW, lots of art offends me. Maplethorpe comes to mind. But I'd never suggest censoring art. Ever.

And to the prophet - God created us in His image - nothing at all to be embarrassed about.

Sarcastic? Yep, I can be that way. But childish? I'll defer that label to the people that think boobs are bad.

jmo

oh stop whining

For Pete sakes, if you can't discuss art with your child then you and your child are in big trouble.

How Quickly We Forget...

Extremes and exaggerations again...

This was about exposing YOUNGSTERS to excessive foul-mouth language and sexually explicit advertisements, etc. I probably would not have been offended at the art itself, just bothered that things like that are showing up more and more everywhere we turn. It is beginning to seem that nowhere is "safe" to take the kids - even city-sponsored events and malls.

A remark was made: "I'm truly sorry that a breast is too much for some to handle...or if it's uncomfortable for some to explain to a child just what a breast is. Or what art is. Sorry that some are so repressed as to find the human body offensive."

That is total exaggeration and unfounded... And is to the extreme. And in my personal case, ridiculous. It also sounds like a sarcastic child.

Can't even have an intelligent conversation with comments like that. Just doesn't work.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Kerry Dougherty rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox