Little protection and high risk - it's the narcotics officer's job

Posted to: Crime News Virginia Beach

VIRGINIA BEACH

It is perhaps the highest-risk position in an already dangerous profession. Undercover police officers step into unpredictable situations carrying their instinct, a quick wit and, occasionally, a gun.

No badge. No body armor.

At some point they most likely will be robbed, assaulted or, at the least, threatened. But rarely are they killed, which is why the Aug. 7 shooting death of a detective in Virginia Beach left undercover experts and investigators across the country stunned.

"There was no way you could stop that," Charlie Fuller, an undercover tactics trainer and retired special agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, said last week of the shooting that killed Detective Michael Smith Phillips.

Police say a man walked up to Phillips' pickup and abruptly opened fire, killing the detective as he tried to negotiate the sale of a half-pound of marijuana with a suspected dealer. He was the first undercover narcotics detective to be killed this year in the United States, according to the Officer Down Memorial Page Web site, which tracks law enforcement deaths.

Phillips wasn't wearing a bulletproof vest, but that's not uncommon for undercover detectives, particularly in hot weather, when one is harder to conceal.

Fuller, who was leading a training session in Seattle when he heard the news, immediately wondered how he could help other officers learn from the tragedy.

"I'm thinking, 'How can I stop it? What can I tell them so it doesn't happen again?' " he recalled in a phone interview.

His conclusion: "There's nothing I can tell them..."

"You can plan all you want, but if someone's going to assassinate you, there's not much you can do."

Phillips' death underscored the risk associated with undercover police work, a role described as both invaluable and dangerous. Undercover officers often must change their appearance, work late hours and deal with people they do n't know, usually alone and up to a football field's length from backup.

A successful operation, however, can lead to a "slam-dunk case," said Brian Sallee, a national trainer and undercover narcotics detective in Albuquerque, N.M.

"It's high-risk for little amounts of dope," he said, "but it's good results because you can make good, solid cases taking off the streets the people who are most destructive, most disruptive in your community."

In nearly 18 years investigating narcotics, Sallee said he has taken part in hundreds of undercover drug buys or sales. He arrested three generations of two different families during stings, and he loved the job so much that he retired from the force and came back four months later because he missed narcotics work.

He also has been robbed and shot at during undercover operations. Other detectives in his department, he said, have been knocked unconscious or robbed at gunpoint. Two of his colleagues barely escaped execution at the hands of three men they'd arranged to sell 80 pounds of marijuana.

"They had it set up to rip them off and just kill them both," he said.

All undercover operations carry risks, but it is the street-level deal, like the one Phillips was engaged in when he was shot, that is the most dangerous, experts said. Such dealers are more likely to be users themselves, and their backgrounds can be difficult to track.

Virginia Beach police haven't released details about how well Phillips knew Ted Vincent Carter or Marshall D. Moyd, the two men who were arrested and charged in his death.

Court records show Phillips and Moyd arranged the Aug. 7 deal by phone, with Moyd agreeing to sell a half-pound of marijuana to Phillips for $675. Backup officers were watching Moyd and Phillips negotiate inside a pickup truck when, police say, Carter suddenly stepped up and opened fire on Phillips, striking him three times in the torso.

Another court document says Carter later told an investigator "a voice" told him to shoot the detective. Police Chief Jake Jacocks has said department policies are being reviewed, but, he said, Phillips and other officers at the scene appeared to have followed proper procedure.

Undercover work can be the most rewarding job a police officer can perform, said Kenneth Stolle, a state senator and former Virginia Beach police narcotics detective.

Stolle said he was once held at gunpoint during an undercover cocaine buy at a city restaurant.

The dealers, he said, suspected him of being a police officer. Stolle denied it and tried to talk his way out. After a waitress vouched for him and insisted he wasn't an officer, the dealers relaxed, Stolle said.

"The one thing I do know," he added, "is that you're not going to be able to conduct investigations, not going to be able to identify the dealers, unless there's some cop in some city who's willing to risk his life to make the buys that typically start the investigations."

Staff writer Duane Bourne contributed to this report.

Shawn Day, (757) 222-5131, shawn.day@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

wHAT i THINK

"I think he might have an addictive personality, as he has had issues with alcohol as well."

I think your relative was the problem and not the substance. An addictive personality may latch on to shopping per my earlier example. Marijuana is not physically addictive and that is a fact. Does it not bother you that honest hard working people can be prosecuted for smoking a harmless plant to protect those who cannot take care of themself? Does it make sense that children no longer have their father and the marijuana is no harder to find? Think about that. W/ all of the effort, deaths, imprisonments, and billions of dollars spent, the drugs are easier than ever to find. So in the end, who is the bigger victim? Your relative that has personal issues or the kid who is sentenced to a few years in prison for some pot? Your relative or the dead cops?

Ira

I noticed it firsthand in a relative of ours, who got cozy with marijuana, then decided he had no reason to work and support his wife and kids (well, she worked--she had to!). Thankfully, he recovered. I think he might have an addictive personality, as he has had issues with alcohol as well. I understand about libertarians and personal choice, but when we legalize drugs, are we also prepared to utilize tough love with those who choose to drop out or who have a genetic predisposition to do so (however, we might express that)? And also, with their wives/husbands, who have chosen to marry someone with an addictive personality, eyes open or not? What about the kids who are born to the dropouts--isn't it immoral to let them starve to death? Just wondering what you think about all of that, as there are people who won't use because it is illegal, but will try it when it is available. Cheers, MGM

Standard misinformation

"won't have any greater impact than them living with their mother for the rest of their lives like they do. Start smoking when you're 10 or 12--you stay there emotionally and it shows. I've witnessed it personally."

Some of the most succesful people I have ever known smoke. Successful businessmen, doctors, parents, and prominent citizens. What do you do johnl? It is this type blanket statement that has been instilled by the goverment over the years to make you buy what they are selling. it's a lie. You cannot blame weed anymore than you can blame clothes when a young woman goes bankrupt overspending. It is a fact that illegal drug money is the largest contributor to supporting crime in this country. All of the efforts to stop it fail. it's a facade that some of you believe is effective. Your kids can get drugs today w/ no problem regardless of the enforcement.

Marijuana Deaths

In reference to donvabeach and the stats he provides. First of all the stats from CDC do not incooperate the deaths RELATED to marijuana use, such as vehicle accidents, robberies, homicides etc. They just relate to known deaths from marijuana as a cause. Also, the stats as you noticed were all prior to 2000, (at least 8 yrs. old)and some as old as 1988, 1992 etc. The year is missing from the marijuana death stat! CDC does not deal in contributing causes of death regarding drugs, only deaths directly attributed to the drugs, such as marijuana poisoning or an adverse reaction. A driver impaired by marijuana but dies in a vehicle crash, is listed as a vehicular death on the death certificate, albeit it may also list marjuana as a "Contributing" factor, not the real cause of death.

livfull4all

Officer Phillips was killed in a robbery attempt by hardened criminals. The Pilot keeps connecting this tragedy to the war on drugs.

Officer Phillips

I have read all the comments written and it disturbs me that there is an actual debate going on about the legalization of a drug that is obviously a problem, case in point Officer Phillps life is taken because of a drug that some feel needs to be legal so the killing will stop. WHAT are you thinking of? Did you miss the fact that due to this drug an Officer, Husband, Father, Son and Friend was killed. Do you believe by making something legal this will stop? Where is your Father, Son, or Family member fit into this picture? Think about it! And think about how these posts have forgotten a human life was taken by an individual who could care less about your cheep opinions and views. Officer Phillips was doing his job to protect you and your family from useless animals such as these two individuals. Who do you really want to stand up for? Remember you have friends and family as well. Officer Phillips friends a

Nothing is being slanted but the posts by some dopers...

...They think that just because they feel they're OK with growing and smoking some weed for personal use that it's the same for everybody else, and won't have any greater impact than them living with their mother for the rest of their lives like they do. Start smoking when you're 10 or 12--you stay there emotionally and it shows. I've witnessed it personally. MJ is far different from alcohol, and it's at least equally devastating to the habitual excess users.

RE:Then what's next for legalization?

The Pilot is slanting these articles to invite this debate hoping to inflame passions.

Danger, Condolences

Back when I worked undercover narcotics, there was no backup, period. Only a handful of narcotics officers were even aware of your existence. So, I am fully aware of the dangers inherent. My condolences to Det. Phillips family. If an undercover officer took stock of the potential dangers, he or she probably wouldn't do it. Again, my condolences.

Then what's next for legalization?

Cocaine? Heroin? Meth and meth labs for personal use? Oxycontin? Where does it stop? As far as the "body count" question--just look at all the MJ impaired highway, industrial and other accidental deaths that occur each year. There are tens of thousands of them.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


special features