Norfolk police chief gives details on fatal shooting of girl

Posted to: Crime News Norfolk

NORFOLK

Police Chief Bruce P. Marquis said Tuesday that officers thought they had incapacitated 17-year-old Tameika Jordan with a Taser gun when they entered an apartment where she lived last week.

Once inside, however, they found her sitting on a couch pointing a handgun at police, he said. A 12-year veteran of the police force immediately fired a burst at Jordan with an M-4 assault rifle, Marquis said.

She recoiled, then again pointed the gun at police, he said. The same officer then fired another burst, killing Jordan. The officer's identity has not been publicly disclosed.

An autopsy revealed she was shot eight times, Marquis said.

Tests showed that the Taser only partially hit Jordan, meaning it had little or no effect on her, Marquis said.

Marquis, who spoke to the City Council on Tuesday via conference call from out of town, said that officers tried for nearly seven hours to negotiate with the teenager. Her mother told police that she had bipolar disorder, Marquis said.

Jordan, who was about to begin college, was buried Tuesday. Her mother, Catrina Jordan, disputed the chief's version of events.

She never told police her daughter was bipolar, she said in a phone interview, and she said she does not understand the force that police used.

"It was too excessive," she said. "That's it for me."

"I heard the gunshots," she said. "I heard them shoot my baby."

Marquis also told the council that the teenager had fired a gun twice during the night. Catrina Jordan said she did not find a gun in her daughter's belongings before the standoff, and her daughter did not fire any shots that night.

"No gunshots in the house at all," Catrina Jordan said. "We went in the house and took pictures, and there were no holes in the wall at all."

Marquis said the standoff began at 10:30 p.m. Aug. 9 in the 2200 block of Maltby Ave. when Catrina Jordan called the police. She had been going through her daughter's personal belongings.

"The daughter didn't like that," Marquis said.

At least two gunshots were heard in the apartment, the last at 2:14 a.m. Aug. 10, he said. At 4:53 a.m., Jordan broke off communications with the police, who had been speaking with her by telephone.

Police responded by firing tear gas into the apartment. "That apparently had little effect on Tameika," Marquis said.

Marquis said police again briefly communicated with Jordan in the hallway of the apartment building. She was partially behind a door but appeared to be unarmed, he said.

When they were unable to persuade her to surrender, police decided to incapacitate her with a Taser, which fires two electrodes that can temporarily subdue someone with electric shocks.

"Because she was in the doorway without the gun in her hand and because they believed the Taser had some effect on her, the decision was made to enter the apartment," Marquis said.

Tests later revealed that one of the electrodes fired by the Taser was lodged in the door.

Council members said very little after Marquis' spoke.

Councilman Paul R. Riddick, a frequent critic of police, said he was satisfied with the chief's explanation.

"It seems that they tried to do everything they could do," he said.

Councilwoman Daun S. Hester said her heart goes out to Tameika's mother.

"She was trying to do the right thing," Hester said, adding that it seems as if the mother suspected her daughter had a gun.

Asked Mayor Paul Fraim: "What is a 17-year-old doing with a gun?"

 

Pilot writer Matthew Bowers contributed to this report.

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Police shootings

As a former law enforcement professional, I know that officers are taught, once they decide to fire, to continue to fire, until the threat is put down. Only 3 things bother me in this case. Where, when, & how. If no weapon was seen in the child's possession while the officers saw her through the door, where was it? If the officers, upon seeing no weapon, burst in, when did the child have the time to get a gun & seat herself? Lastly, if the officers burst in, right at the time they saw the child unarmed, how did they allow her to go get a gun? All police shootings should be investigated by outside entities.

Geez

Ches37, that comment wasn't thought through was it? Where do you think that bullet is going to go? What about the people that live upstairs? Geez.

Here's your sigh.

r u kidding me!

to ches37..... required to tell them to drop the gun? Then you have to fire a warning shot in the air? are you kidding me. If they are pointing the gun at you, I'm not saying anything, I'm shooting. What do you think happens to the bullet when its fired into the air? It's gotta come down somewhere sometime. Can't shoot a juvenile in some states? Holy cow....now you have to ask the age of the offender before you shoot. Maybe you should read what you are writting before you type it or respond. That has to be some of the craziest I've heard in a long time

Everyone gets hurt in tragedies like this...

These sorts of tragedies hurt all parties involved. It is a shame that we have to resort to insulting language.

Comment administrator

It looks like you deleted Lamarr's comments. Please repost them. People need to see just how pathetic and deep racism runs in some people! His/her comments are so far out in left field that anyone who reads them would have been as disgusted as I was with them.

ches37, you live in fairyland

what dream world do you live in?? if a person aims a gun at ANYONE, the potential victim has the legal right to instantly kill the shooter to defend his own life. there is no "please don't shoot me" or "please put down the gun". any delay at all by the potential victim makes it likely the victim will die and the shooter will live. wrong outcome!! if you hold a concealed carry permit and have taken the training like I have, you would see how ludicrous your approach is.

Ches, you watch too much TV

Warning shots? I don't know of any state that requires a warning shot, especially if the policeman believes his life is in immediate danger.

Nor is the officer required to check the person's driver's license to determine age.

It is sad this young woman is dead, but she pretty clearly forced the decision to shoot on the policeman. Why, we may never know, but the policeman's first concern has to be self-defense, just as it would be for you or me.

What did ches37 say?

Police do not fire warning shots. Point a gun at a police officer in uniform and you will be shot. Police are not required to wait for you to respond to a order to "DROP THE GUN" if you take threatening action toward the officer i.e. point the gun at him. Juvenile or not you will be shot. You watch to much t.v.

The whole story is a tragic example of how society has failed the youth of today. The mother has lost a daughter and the officer has to live with the fact that he was forced to take a life.

Use of force by Police is never pretty and sometimes can be tragic. The officer did his job and should not be second guessed by people who have no idea of the how the job is done.

Glad

I came back and read the updated version of this story. Sad that the young lady had to lose her life. What was so important that she couldn't give up and just go downtown? If she was bi-polar, that would have definitely been taken into consideration regarding her actions. If Mom didn't tell the cops about her bi-polar illness, how did they know? As much as I don't like this particular police chief, I don't believe he'd pull a comment like that out of a hat. I still don't understand how she was able to circumvent the tear gas. The taser...yes..she blocked it w/the door(why shoot the taser w/a door in the way?) I'm sure the Mom is laying the groundwork for a lawsuit w/her comments. I wonder how much she'll be asking for as payment for her daughter's life. It sounds as tho the cops did as much as humanly possible to subdue her w/o incident...unfortunately she chose a different route. And who owns that gun? The cops have it (if it exists...which I think it does). I'm sure they'll trace it. Sad. Sad..Sad

wake up!

when are people going to realize that everyone doesn't want to stick around because they have been taught that something so grand happens after you're dead. i don't even remember Jesus having too much to say about being dead and in the history of people bringing people back from the dead , if he had said something , then i'm sure we would have heard about it since there is a whole book about him attached to the jewish religion book ,"the torah " with attachment "the bible" . But waiting or assuming that god is going to do something to the police officer for doing another job with a gun that was made to either scare you into behaving ,so that you wouldn't have to deal with the consequences of your own decisions is totally ridiculous. guns were made to have an easier way for people to kill other people and sometimes yourself, whether you had enough courage to pull the trigger yourself and supposedly face e

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


special features