The Virginian-Pilot
©
It wasn’t particularly shocking or funny when Cheech and Chong lit up for “Up in Smoke” in 1978. It’s still not entertaining, with the slacker-stoner, ho-hum comedy “Pineapple Express.” It assumes that inhaling is sufficiently naughty to spur the prurient and that watching someone else get high is inherently hilarious.
Been there. Seen that.
As stoner comedies go, it’s a good deal sloppier and lacking in invention than the recent, somewhat endearing antics of Harold and Kumar. This movie is committed to the theory that anyone who dismisses it as the inane trash it is will be branded uncool.
One suspects that the brand name of producer Judd Apatow, who seems to have a hand in every potential blockbuster comedy, will ensure the reverence of the cool seekers. He still calls upon the names of last year’s “Superbad” and 2005’s “The 40-Year-Old Virgin.” (For how many more movie seasons?)
Seth Rogen, a specialist in vulnerable, chubby types, plays Dale Denton, who issues court summonses for a living. When he witnesses a murder committed by a drug kingpin (Gary Cole) and a crooked cop (Rosie Perez), he goes on the run. Rogen, who has been proclaimed a star long before he’s due, looks sour and put-upon. Not funny.
Only the exaggerated scenes in which weed is sold to middle-school kids and police cars are stolen even remotely suggest comedy.
The movie’s real surprise is James Franco, who plays Dale’s buddy, a dingbat drug dealer named Saul Silver whose baked demeanor seems stolen from Sean Penn in 1982’s “Fast Times at Ridgemont High.” Franco is better known as a James Dean type on TV and the handsome villain in the “Spider-Man” movies. Here, he proves that an actor is often funnier than a comic. He steals every scene he’s in.
Apatow has developed a formula in which he adds a “sweet” or “redeeming” scene to his raunchy comedies. This allows some fawning critics to give his films favorable notices. These “buddy” flicks have even spawned a new word for the genre – bromances. This one slips, though, in that there is no real growth in the relationship between Dale and Saul.
The most embarrassing scene is one in which the two cavort in a wooded setting as a kind of montage of togetherness.
To make sure of the movie’s stance, Saul says the Pineapple Express of the title is so rare “it’s almost a shame to smoke it. It’s like killing a unicorn.” In a black-and-white prologue that makes no sense, a character reacts to the same “express” with the ecstatic claim, “I feel like a slice of butter melting over a big old pile of flapjacks. Yeah.” How poetic.
Of course there is a token finale about the perils of reefer madness. It’s uttered with about the same satiric tinge as that comedy overstatement.
Even stranger is the fact that David Gordon Green, the promising director of a lyrical little independent film in 2000 called “George Washington,” apparently sold out to join the mainstream here.
The movie is blessed with another scene-stealer. Danny McBride is quite inventive as a super-polite but utterly challenged druggie on the edge of nothingness. He always wants to be friends with people, but he betrays everyone and is quite violent. He’s is the only truly original character on view.
As desperate as the slapstick is, it is not as sloppy as the action side of things. Apparently, there was an effort to create something reminiscent of a 1970s B-budget action movie. This would be quite a welcome contrast to all the over-produced superhero films of this summer, except for the execution. The action staging looks about on the level of “The Love Bug” (1968) or “The Shaggy Dog” (1959). There is a great deal of gory violence, though.
Just when we thought “The Love Guru” was firmly entrenched as the summer’s worst comedy, this one provides competition.
Does anyone dare to be called “not cool” by pointing out that inhaling is not the same as guffawing?
Yes, we dare.
And we’re cool with it.
Mal Vincent, (757) 446-2347, mal.vincent@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

please retire Mal
I have been subjected to Mal's "reviews" since I was a kid and I'm almost 50. What a drag it must be, Mal, to hate everything. Also, I don't know anyone who DOESN'T read his reviews and then base their movie viewing on doing the opposite of what this washed up windbag says.
Mal's problem s
Mal's problems as a reviewer should be obvious to anyone who regularly reads his reviews. First, he has real prejudices against certain actors. Phillip Seymour Hoffman comes to mind immediately, as does Seth Rogen. He badmouthed him in Knocked Up and Superbad, two extremely successful and well reviewed films. He carries this prejudice from film to film. That's the sign of a hack; hating the movie before he sees it. The other problem is Mal's unabashed love for the OLD Hollywood and the star system that went along with it. He simply does not get new films, or understand their appeal to modern moviegoers. Meanwhile, he gives positive reviews to pap like Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. Finally, he tries whenever possible to go against the tide of what other, more renowned critics have to say about a movie, then attacks the critics as snobs. I should also mention the many errors he makes in hi
i thought i was the only one
i thought i was the only one who did that
Terrible Review
Mal once again you hate a movie that is absolutely great. I usually base my movie choices on whatever the opposite is of what you say. Keep up the bad work.