After trial run, Elizabeth City adding 18 cameras

Posted to: News North Carolina


Several cameras were mounted recently in Elizabeth City, including one near Harney and Cypress streets. (Chris Curry | The Virginian-Pilot)


Background
When cameras were first proposed, critics complained of cost and the loss of privacy. City officials debated for months over buying first 40 and then 20 cameras before voting the plan down. Last year, the council settled on a test program of six cameras at a cost of $97,000.

Where will the cameras go?
The additional 18 cameras, at a cost of $171,000, could be divided among the four wards in Elizabeth City, but police can put them where they are needed most, Councilwoman Betty Meiggs said. Of the initial six cameras, Meiggs said, “They’ve made people feel safer.”

ELEIZABETH CITY, N.C.

Six neighborhood security cameras have helped Elizabeth City police make arrests in two shootings, a hit-and-run and a car burglar y.

So now they're going to add 18 more.

"They've made people feel safer," Councilwoman Betty Meiggs said.

Scenes are recorded for viewing later, or police can watch them live at the station.

In March, a camera on Queen Street showed a man firing a pistol, said Capt. Frank Koch of the Elizabeth City Police Department.

"The dude was out there just firing away," he said. "You could see the smoke coming out."

When cameras were first proposed, critics cited cost and loss of privacy. City officials debated for months over buying first 40 and then 20 cameras before voting it down. Last year, the council settled on a test program of six cameras at a cost of $97,000.

The additional 18 cameras, at a cost of $171,000, could be divided among the four wards, but police can put them where they are needed most, Meiggs said.

Bell, Cypress, Greenleaf, Harney, Queen and Banks streets, where the cameras are mounted, are better places to live now, said the Rev. Wilbert Tatum, president of the Sawyertown Community Watch and chairman of the Mayor's Crime Task Force.

"If we had one on every corner, it would be ideal," Tatum said.

Drug convictions come more easily with a witness and cameras can be more reliable than people, said District Attorney Frank Parrish.

"Any technology can shed some light," he said. "They're not on a side. They record an objective record."

In 1997, a community watch group formed in the Sawyertown area to help police nab drug dealers. Police couldn't make arrests unless they caught criminals in the act. Neighbors called when they saw activity.

A deteriorating house at Bell and Harney streets served as a base for crack cocaine dealers. Buyers would swing onto the street from U.S. 17, drive by first to alert sellers, then on the second pass make the purchase without getting out of the car. It was a quick exit back to U.S. 17.

The operation was shut down thanks in large part to the community group. The cameras add to the community's ability to keep watch, Tatum said.

In 1999, police conducted a large sting using fake cocaine, undercover officers and another hidden officer videotaping the transaction. At least 23 were arrested.

About three years ago, the late Carlton White began allowing officers to hide in his shed on Grady Street and watch criminal activity through a hole in the wall.

He later proposed cameras to help keep a more constant watch.

Jeff Hampton, (252) 338-0159, jeff.hampton@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules. Comments do not reflect the views or approval of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language. Due to high volume, comments might not appear immediately on the site. We reserve the right to reject any comment for any reason. Readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment to alert an editor. Repeat offenders will be denied automatic posting privileges.

Great Idea

I wish Va Beach would do the same...however, Va Beach is more concerned about the revenue it will get from the Red-light cameras...these cameras watching for criminal activity don't produce revenue...so Va Beach will not increase the numbers of these types of cameras throughout the city.

A camera is an invasion of your privacy but a drug dealer isn't?

It never ceases to amaze me the people that want crime out of their neighborhoods but dont want their privacy invaded. In the worst neighborhoods, the residents dont ever "see" anything and feel violated if the polics use alterative tactics. If you have dealers on your corner or people get shot outside your door and you feel violated that a camera is watching your street or racially profiled if a cop patrols your street more than others, close your door and shut your piehole! Cameras tell no lies and are almost impossible to beat in court. If it takes that kind of solid results to clean your street then look the other way from the cameras just as you did to the police when they asked for your help. Unitl the police put up a camera using your mailbox as a decoy, you dont have a right to the way police clean public streets of public nuesance and crime.


More Stories Like This

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox