Tom Shean
The Virginian-Pilot
©
Executives and owners of several Hampton Roads businesses endorsed plans for a bailout of the nation's financial markets Friday, but some expressed wariness about the $700 billion plan that was being debated in Washington.
Stephen Ballard, owner and chief executive officer of S.B. Ballard Construction Co. in Virginia Beach, said he called Republican U.S. Rep. Thelma Drake on Friday to urge her to work for speedy approval of the plan.
"I told her she needed to make this thing work and get it done... so that on Monday the American economy comes back," he said. "We need to get this resolved... so the American public gets some confidence back and everyone stops being in such a panic."
Objections from House Republicans brought the talks to a standstill Thursday. Late Friday, Democrats said they had accepted a Republican proposal to create a hybrid plan that would keep the securities in private hands.
Ballard said his business has been hurt by the economic slowdown and credit crunch. Of the 27 units in the Bayvista condominium complex that Ballard built in Virginia Beach, 10 remain available.
"We haven't sold one since January," he said.
A residence hall he had hoped to build at Norfolk State University also has been delayed.
"The American economy right now couldn't take another hit," Ballard said, "and I'm concerned about the housing industry and the building industry."
A major government effort is essential for stabilizing the nation's financial markets and spurring confidence among bank depositors, said Brad Schwartz, executive vice president and chief financial officer at Monarch Bank in Chesapeake. But, he said, the Treasury Department program was designed to help Wall Street's investment banks rather than Main Street. Community bankers, he said, are monitoring several details, including the Treasury's plans to insure the assets of money-market mutual funds.
Schwartz, who joined about 50 other Virginia bankers at meetings in Washington this week with members of Congress and federal regulators, said lending will slow significantly unless the financial markets receive some sort of support.
One part of the Treasury plan, which calls for buying troubled car loans and sour credit-card debt, probably would be eliminated, Schwartz said.
A solution to the credit crisis lies with the federal government because "the problem is big, and there isn't anybody else who can step forward with the safety net that's needed," said Jack Gibson, president and CEO of Norfolk-based Bank of Hampton Roads and its parent, Hampton Roads Bankshares Inc.
Some of the region's small-business owners voiced concern about the way the bailout package was put together.
"I'm not questioning the fact that we need to do something dramatic," said Rowena Fullinwider, president of Rowena's Inc., a food manufacturer based in Norfolk. "However, to do this without a clear definition of oversight makes me as a citizen, more than a businessperson, really, really nervous. I would like that oversight defined and put into whatever they're going to do about it."
Fullinwider said she was disconcerted by the speed with which many politicians signed on to the program.
"I don't think everyone should go, 'Yes, yes, yes, just throw it out there,' " she said. "It looked, to me, like that's what was happening. I was flabbergasted."
In Virginia Beach, Edward L. Hamm Jr. said he thought the government had to take action.
"The approach that they've selected would have a dramatic impact that would show the investors in those kinds of institutions that the government is behind them," said Hamm, president and CEO of the engineering and consulting firm E.L. Hamm & Associates Inc.
Hamm, however, isn't convinced a bailout is necessary.
"My intuition tells me that if we do nothing, the probability over time is that we would be OK," he said. "But that is a risk that I'm not willing to take."
Bill Putnam, co-owner of Progressive Window Co. in Virginia Beach, said the bailout plan would help his window-installation company by easing fears about the national economy.
"I don't like the government getting involved in something like this, but I think we're at the point where he have to," Putnam said. "When people are fearful of their future, their retirement, their personal cash flow, they are not spending money."
The Treasury's bailout package came under a blistering critique earlier this week from John Allison, the chairman and CEO of BB&T Corp., the Winston-Salem, N.C.-based parent of Branch Banking & Trust Co. and brokerage firm Scott & Stringfellow Inc. The Treasury's plan "is primarily a bailout of poorly run financial institutions," Allison wrote in a letter to some members of Congress.
Allison faulted the program's architects for not focusing on housing-related issues and called for direct government purchases of housing assets, including lots and houses under construction.
Protecting the nation's banking system is an established government function, said Allison, who is scheduled to retire from BB&T at the year's end after almost 20 years as its top executive.
"It is completely unclear why the government needs to or should bail out insurance companies, investment banks, hedge funds and foreign companies," he said.
Tom Shean, (757) 446-2379, tom.shean@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
please
Please folks, look through the posts which actually offer you inforamtion and confirm it independently. Look at Don Tabor's timeline on the the legislation. There is good info available here. Understanding a problem is a large step to curing it.
If Obama understood the issue he could explain it. He won't. His position is purely political. To get in depth would alienate his followers who want it kept light.
Do you want to look it up or follow people like davidj? Personally I will be smiling and confident when I place my ballot for McCain. Never have I been more convinced of the dangers of his opposition.
Bankers Want US [you and I] to Socialize their Losses
Bankers are the custodians and fiduciaries of the deposits we intrust to them.
Bankers live on the spread between the interest they pay us -- remember 1 percent CD rates -- and the interest they charge on their loans -- remember 10 percent car loans and 25 percent credit card rates. That spread produced nice juice profits.
With those juice profits, bankers, first, gave themselves nice fat salaries, second, extended loans to their fat cat developer friends who built, without consideration to the market, to many houses and condos, and third, because of their lending policies, put our deposits above $100K it risk of loss.
As custodians and fiduciaries, and without the tax payer bail out, a lot of Virginia bankers and developers might go belly up.
Hey, that's capitalism.
Politicians, not low income buyers, to blame
No one can blame low income wage earners for trying to take advantage of new ways to buy a home. Supporters of the Community Reinvestment Act thought they were doing good. But any time government meddles in the marketplace, there will be unintended consequences you won't like.
Those same sub-prime mortgages which made it possible for low income renters to buy a $200K home they could not afford to pay for at realistic interest rates were also used by middle income buyers to buy $800K homes they could not afford to pay for either. Since Fannie and Freddie only had to actually have 2.5% of the money they loaned, huge amounts of money which could only be spent on houses were injected into the housing market, driving prices skyward. Sooner or later, the bubble had to burst.
The lesson? Keep governments role in the marketplace to that of a referee, preventing the use of force and fraud, but otherwise leaving us alone.
Read my lips...
If any of my representatives in the senate or house vote for this bill, they will NOT get my vote come re-election time. The American people overwhelmingly are against this measure. Lawyers (our representatives) are not econominc experts and it is their continual meddling that has got us to this point. Let the markets work!
NO
BAILOUT!!!!!
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
There is a flip side to this. All the people that saw it as madness, and sat out. While I don't enjoy seeing the job losses, and I don't enjoy seeing the cheaters getting away, I *AM* looking forward to collapse of property prices. I know there are others like me. Ah I remember those smug useless people that matter of factly tell you that you better buy, because prices aren't going down. They remind you of how much their property price has increased, as if they somehow worked to "earn" the riches. People who bought somehow supposedly deserve huge increases in equity. They often borrow it all and spend it on short term items like vacations and cars. But now, it's time to give it back. Of course they need to be bailed out, and they deserve not to pay taxes on the amount forgiven by the bankruptcy court said the gov't. But at last, a kick in the face to the smug, often occupationally worthless who felt they were entitled. Kiss your granite goodbye, and watch the young people you dumped on buy it at the foreclosure sale.
Low income and minority citizens are to blame?
Seriously, those $600,000-$800,000 houses in Great Bridge and Hickory that can't be sold were built for low income minorities? Really? I'm glad that's cleared up.
Not Taxpayers Money
Taxpayers money? If they give 700 trillion not one dime will come out of my pocket. So don't be fooled by those words "taxpayers money". Let them go down.
NO BAILOUT!!!!
FannieMae, Freddie Mac, blah blah blah--whatever. I'll bet S.B.Ballard is worried. This "poor" guy and other developers like him took advantage of every opportunity to destroy the northend and other nice areas so they could line their pockets with tons of our hard earned money. Seven years ago You could of bought one house on a full lot at the Northend for around $200,000. But these guys got greedy and started kocking down single homes and throwing up multiple cheap vinyl condos/townhomes and then charging $600,000 for one unit! I hope that there is no bailout and that you should suffer as I do everytime I'm sitting in my living room listening to my neighbors cough or talk on the phone in their little, expensive plastic home. Don't even get me started about the nightmare of the lack of residential parking in these areas.
Sure, build some cheap little boxes, stack them on top of each other and call them condos. Great idea--if you're a gerbil!You developers were so greedy and probably blew every bit of money that came your way--TOUGH!!!! I say no bailout for you and those of your ilk. And you say quantity not quality--so take it! Take it like a man and shut up about it!
No bailout
No bailout as long as CEOs and entities such as ACORN will benefit.....those who sold mortgages to people who can't pay them, well, bad decision. If I make a bad decision, I have to take the consequences. Why don't they have to do the same? Allow these people to refinance their mortgages from the interest only ARMs to a fixed rate, paying principal. Companies/banks will take a hit, but not a total hit. People will keep their homes and everyone moves on. As far as all these expensive condos not being sold, well, build something the average person can afford and maybe you will sell them - but being so greedy as to put it out of the average person's price range, well, you buy it. There needs to be more affordable housing for people anyway (lower income, elderly).