Windy logic
RE 'WIND FARM OFF Virginia coast is doable,' front page, Aug. 31: One of the proponents from Old Dominion University was quoted as saying it 'really seems to make sense.' However, aspects of the story pointing to the success of the Horns Reef wind farm in Denmark made little sense to me.
It experienced numerous problems with its transformers and generators, requiring dismantling of all 80 units. Furthermore, repairs on-site were not an option because of rough weather conditions in the North Sea. As a consequence, all nacelles and blades were transported ashore to accomplish repairs.
Horns Reef is emblematic of enormous subsidies to industries that would not exist in a free market.
In the U.S., such industries are being supported by massive government subsidies and tax write-offs that shift the cost of resulting electricity to unsuspecting Americans' tax bills and monthly electricity bills.
COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Old Sea Dog/ Highly Subsidized Windmill Farms.
Ditto Old Sea Dog.
Election time cometh; so remember who is for the People and who the enemies are.
Couldn't agree more...
I couldn't agree more or have said it better than the OldSeaDog.
Windy logic
Wind power (and solar power) can be a part of a comprehensive stragety to unleash us from foreign oil. But to think that wind porwer alone, as the editorial implies, is a suitable replacement for oil is hopeful thinking at best. Only a small percentage of our energy needs can be supplied by wind power even with agressive wind power deveopment. I suspect the real underlying goal of this editorial is another attempt by the Pilot staff to promote the Democratic party by supporting their flawed energy strategy of no additional domestic drilling and no additional nuclear facilities.
What we need is a comprehensive national energy strategy including an agressive solar, wind, geothermal and nuclear development program coupled with increased domestic drilling to give us oil an gas resources in the short term. John McCain is the only Presidential candidate advocating this approach.