Sen. John Warner, R-Va.
Warner voted yes in what may prove to be his final major act in the Senate. He is retiring in January after five terms, and the Senate will be meeting only a few times before that.
Warner did not make a statement before the vote and was unavailable for comment later. His vote was foreshadowed last week when he said that he saw little alternative to asking taxpayers to bear the burden of a market rescue.
Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va.
Webb voted yes, saying in a statement issued later that his decision was "based on the reality that this legislation provides the only possible opportunity that will be offered in the Congress this year to address this situation."
Webb had avoided tipping his hand, but in a Senate speech Tuesday he called for several additions to the legislation rejected Monday in the House. He said the final bill includes much of what he sought.
"In particular, I am pleased that we included meaningful provisions to limit executive compensation and to give taxpayers the chance to share in any gains achieved through this legislation," he said. "These provisions will help to restore taxpayer confidence in our financial system and ease the credit crunch that threatens economic growth."
He also had urged that decisions about government purchases of troubled securities be shared by a three-member board rather than entrusted solely to the secretary of the Treasury, but that change wasn't included.
Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C.
Burr voted yes, saying "the fundamental reason the Senate is compelled to act today is to stop an economic collapse of Main Street."
In a prepared statement, Burr said he was "very concerned and angry about the circumstances that have brought our country's economy to the brink" and called the vote "a sad day in our nation's history."
But Burr said the bill's failure would trigger "the worst economic state" in the nation's history. The plan has been improved in the Senate, he said, "with important protections for taxpayers, limits on executive compensation for Wall Street, and strong measures to ensure proper oversight and accountability."
Sen. Elizabeth Dole, R-N.C.
Dole voted no after releasing a statement denouncing the bailout as "a government takeover of our economy with no protection for taxpayers."
"I was against the Administration's original plan," she said. "I was against the bill that failed in the House. This latest revision is an improvement but still contains the flaws of the earlier proposals, and I will not support it."
Dole, who is in a battle for re-election, urged colleagues to "take the time to get this right."
She said lawmakers should act to ease credit markets by securing loans or creating a loan guarantee program rather than by purchasing securities. She also called for "a significant and immediate tax credit for purchasing a home" and said the Treasury secretary should be required to give Congress a report "on the future role of the federal government in the U.S. mortgage market."
Dale Eisman, (703) 913-9872, dale.eisman@pilotonline.com






Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

unbelievable
what isn't mentioned in this article and the media in general is the 150 billion in extra earmarks the Senate added to the House Bill. I just can't believe that it's necessary for our Senators to have to bribe each other with ridiculous earmarks in order to pass legislation as serious as this. I'm still not convinced it's even necessary. The market may be damaged but it's not broken. Let Wall Street fix it with the billions of dollars in bonus' the CEOs give themselves every year. You can start with Frank Raines of Freddy Mac.....
Right
Saunders got it right.
Warner - good riddence.
If the new Warner is elected, we will have the ugliest combination of Senators in the Senate.
I agree with Elizabeth.
With people of extraordinary talent and independent voice, like Elizabeth Dole available, I am even more angry that McCain's puppet masters shoved a blank slate like Sarah Palin down his throat.
This is a very bad, fat-laden bill. In a few months, the sheeple will see that, while we got a temporary respite from our credit squeeze, in the long run, we'll merely be another $800 billion in the hole.
A sad day for the Senate. I'm particularly disappointed in my Republican Senators, for losing their nerve, and allowing fear, rather than love of the principals of Democracy, guide them.