The Virginian-Pilot
©
Two-thirds of local property managers rejected or discouraged black renters in favor of whites either by charging them higher rents or telling them that the units were unavailable, according to a housing study released Wednesday.
The year long audit, performed by nonprofit advocacy group Housing Opportunities Made Equal, found that landlords and property managers across Hampton Roads subtly discouraged black renters from moving into largely white neighborhoods.
The discrimination occurred in all seven Hampton Roads cities and across all income levels, at both large apartment complexes and at single-family homes. And it's gotten worse.
More renters faced discrimination this year than during a similar study in 2002, which showed that 60 percent of black renters were discouraged from certain properties. The findings indicate that local educational efforts to inform property owners and managers about fair housing laws have failed, Connie Chamberlin, president and CEO of HOME, said.
Now, the only way to get property owners' attention is to file lawsuits against them, she said. Chamberlin hinted that her organization is preparing to take legal action in a number of incidents based on the audit.
"It's clear that somebody's not taking it seriously," she said. "There are others who will only change their practices if they are held to account, and the price of violating those laws is high.
"These are the kinds of things you'd have expected to see 50 years ago, but that you really shouldn't be seeing today."
The agency's audit, paid for by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development, also revealed that disabled renters fared poorly when searching for apartments and houses to rent.
A survey of 25 newly built apartment complexes across the region revealed that nearly 90 percent failed to meet accessibility requirements, and a majority of landlords refused to accept service animals such as seeing-eye dogs - a violation of housing laws.
"There's been training and education on this issue for 20 years, so it's very discouraging," Chamberlin said.
The group tested 165 properties in Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, Chesapeake, Virginia Beach, Hampton and Newport News from March 2007 to August 2008. Chamberlin declined to specify which properties and landlords denied housing availability to disabled and minority renters, saying that her agency is still looking into some violations for enforcement.
Part of the audit involved sending pairs of similarly qualified renters to 50 apartment complexes, small multi-family units and single-family homes. One renter, who had a slightly better credit rating and income level, was black. The other was white. Among the results:
- A black renter was told prices for an apartment were $100 above what the white renter was quoted.
- A property manager requested a $929 down payment from a black renter, while charging a white renter $250.
- A black renter was told no units were available while a white renter was shown several units.
"You'll see in many of these cases, if you didn't have the comparison, you wouldn't be able to tell you'd been discriminated against," Chamberlin said. "It strikes at the heart of your ability to take care of your family."
According to fair housing laws, landlords and property managers cannot discriminate on the basis of race. In the case of disabled renters, managers must accept service animals and make reasonable accommodations, such as installing ramps and grab bars.
Along with legal enforcement action against the landlords who violated the law, Chamberlin said HOME representatives plan to meet with local housing officials to improve the apartment construction process and ensure that accessibility issues are addressed. She also said her agency plans to seek changes to state law that would require property managers to be certified through fair-housing training.
It's morally and ethically important for the report's findings to be addressed, said Andrew Friedman, Virginia Beach's director of housing and neighborhood preservation.
It's not just property managers who need to hear the message, said Tina Bradley, past president of Hampton Roads' chapter of the National Association of Residential Property Managers.
Real estate agents and owners of just a few properties also need to learn the laws, she said.
"There needs to be a whole lot more education," she said. "And there needs to be a stiffer penalty.
"Discriminating against anyone for anything is just wrong. Some people need to be taught that lesson."
Meghan Hoyer, (757) 446-2293, meghan.hoyer@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Thanks for a good discussion!
Got it, Noon, and thanks for the civility of the discussion.
BTW, I am still wondering where they found a "white" neighborhood to run this study. Last time I looked, the only almost homogeneous neighborhood in Virginia Beach was Middle Plantation and one of our black friends (a couple) had moved there, too. And there are no rentals there, unless they are private homes, which would rule out hauling landlords to court. So I am baffled about where they even ran the study!!! But thanks again. Cheers, MGM
Audit versus study
Mary, I agree that the method you described might be a greater indicator of racism or it's lack, but you're talking about a pretty dramatic and artificial intervention (which limits the veracity of our expermiment in the real world), and I think we're wandering away from the point of the audit. An audit being "an independent examination of a work product to assess compliance with specifications, standards, contractual agreements, or other criteria" versus an experiment, "a test under controlled conditions made to either demonstrate a known truth, examine the validity of a hypothesis, or determine the efficacy of something previously untried" The chief differences being what you're testing and how you're measuring.. In the case of an audit yopur measuring compliance with some sort of standards like fair housing laws. In the case of an experiment, it is the aptness of a hypothesis, "some landlords have discrimitatory practices." You'll appreciate the difference. I'm running out of words. Take care
Racism in Tidewater
Of course a certain amount of racism is always an undercurrent in the south and is to be deplored but the Pilot comments are civil, well considered and respectful of others' comments. I am shocked at the unbridled hatred spewed in Craigslist rants and raves and a bit shaken that these people live among us.
Scary
Noon
That's your scenario, not mine. Only one uncontrolled variable is too many. I gave examples of what they might be.
And . . . remember that there is the proven research that people feel more comfortable with "those who look like me," all else being equal. So, can't you just see someone running the credit check on the black person first? At that point, maybe they rule out the black person and pursue the white person without even checking. I would not condone that, but I could see it happening.
I would design the study so that the person has an incentive for choosing the person who doesn't look like him/her. If the racial bias is so deep that they forego the incentive, then you really have something. And I believe I would find that to be a reliable, valid conclusion, because there truly is some nasty racism out there. Cheers, MGM
Where's your method now?
Not as convenient? Ira's theory assumes that the black renter had their credit checked more than the white renter-- otherwise the number of checks would be approximately equal. The biased methods you're dreaming into this audit are starting to get pretty convoluted. You're collective theory, taken to it's ridiculous extreme (sorry), has one fat black single mom with teenage boys, a questionable job history (probably a criminal record) and poor grooming versus a collection of fashionably dressed thin older white couples with no children (or very cute little white kids) and advanced degrees. But, according to you, it is the study that is probably biased . . . no other explanation makes sense . . . a sad joke, that. But whatever makes you happy. Take care
Authority and reputation
Yes, Noon, I don't have a hard and fast set of facts about the study authors only considering one variable (credit reports) except that they presumably knew this would be a front page headline (why I even noticed the article at all!) and had their chance to make their case in advance. If I had controlled the study for weight, manner of dress, married vs. single, ages of kids, etc., I would have mentioned it, knowing that you only get one chance to make a good impression on the front page. But maybe they did all that and just did not mention it to the reporter. I'm still waiting for one of them to jump into this discussion, which has generated around 40 responses, and explain just what they did do.
Ira might have been right, too, in that each credit report queried is noted, so some may have gotten scared when they saw 50 recent inquiries on the subject's credit report. I want to know more. Cheers, MGM
I think you're confusing
I think you're confusing method with authority and reputation. Proxy methods of selecting representative samples from a given population can be valid, depending on what you're trying to measure. It is not a matter of raising or lowering the bar. It is a matter of constructing an appropriate tool for the task. It really doesn't have anything to do with race, other than how race might influence the interpretation of the results. The nature and origin of that interpretation was and is my point. I mispoke about the 50 people though. The description of the 'audit' (note the term) says they used 'pairs of renters' who went to 50 rental properties. The number of participants could range from 2 -100. Given that there will apparently be some legal action i'd be interested in knowing what the methods were. It may not matter in the cases where the landlords offered different terms for the same property on the same day.
Noon, yesterday you
Noon, yesterday you suggested using the variation in demographics between 50 people as part of the study (uncontrolled variables!). That was what led me to conclude you hadn't used scientific method before, also when you said you could design a study in your garage. Sorry I didn't catch on earlier that you have actually done this stuff like me.
I agree about the straw poll stuff but they clearly said they are using the study to contact the courts to sue these guys!
I sat next to black students (like 30% of our residence halls) in college and saw the profs hold us all to the same methods of scientific research. They got good grades like me if they worked the study right. Otherwise, the profs made us redesign it. There were no "C's" for sloppy research--you had to do it over again. So I don't think it is ever good to put research on a lowered bar because it has results applying to minorities or minorities did it or whatever. Cheers, MGM
and straw polls
There are also a host of informal methods for gathering information. these methods have a limited validity to them that depends on how the the results are used. If for instance, the plan was to sue these land lords for descrimination than what we know of this study suggests it is not valid for that. If however, they wanted to "take the temperature" of the rental market in this area to use the results to focus the resources of thier organization or raise public awareness than this study may well be accurate enough to be useful.
Tell us
What is your field?
No one disagreed w/ the testers or it's finding(myself and Mary). We are questioning the validity of the test via it's method of testing. Your describing an imaginary scenario. Your defending what you yourself do not have the answers on. We simply want to know HOW they arrived at their conclusion. The actual conclusion means little in this context.