Forecast
38°
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Indiana town to Chesapeake: Fly-ash battle won’t be easy

Posted to: Chesapeake Environment Fly ash News

Download free Flash player to view videos:
Get Adobe Flash Player
Video: Residents deal with fly ash.
(Watch full size, embed and link.)

Steve Earley | The Virginian-Pilot



TOWN OF PINES, Ind.

Jan Nona watched and carefully recorded what happened to her hometown when fly ash contaminated the water supply. Dangerous things came out of the wells. Regulators arrived. Legal fights began. Eight years passed. And the fly ash remains.

That is why she thinks she knows what will happen in Chesapeake, even though she lives about 850 miles away and has only driven through Virginia once.

“They’ve got so much coming their way that they don’t understand,” she said.

Nona lives in Town of Pines, Ind., an enclave of working-class people in post-World War II homes close to the shore of Lake Michigan.

It seems a world away from the wide-open spaces along Murray Drive and Whittamore Road in Chesapeake’s Fentress area . But e ach community has had to deal with ground water contamination either directly under or downstream from massive placements of fly ash, the powdery, contaminant-laden residue left from the burning of coal for electricity.

There are several overlapping plot lines: intervention by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Superfund connections; at least 1 million tons of fly ash placed near homes with wells; early assurances that fly ash is safe; extension of city water to residents, at power companies’ expense; and continuing investigations.

An EPA report released last year cited 67 cases nationwide of proven or potential damage to ground or surface water because of coal-combustion products. Town of Pines is one of them .

T here is no federal regulation for the disposal of fly ash. It’s left up to each state, leaving a patchwork quilt of widely varying policies nationwide.

After years of complaints and suspicion by Town of Pines residents that something was wrong with the water in the community, Indiana state officials found benzene, a known human carcinogen, in the well water of one resident in 2000.

Follow-up tests on the wells of others in the area found high levels of arsenic, lead and manganese.

Three years later, the EPA designated the affected parts of town as an “alternative approach agreement” Superfund site – a Superfund category reserved for responsive “potentially responsible parties.”

Last summer, tests at Chesapeake’s Battlefield Golf Club at Centerville, which opened a year ago, revealed elevated levels of arsenic, lead, manganese, chromium and other contaminants in groundwater under the course.

Two rounds of city-funded tests to determine whether contaminants had affected any residential wells nearby found some evidence of boron – a well-known marker of fly-ash contamination.

Boron levels at Town of Pines ranged as high as 16,000 parts per billion, dwarfing the highest boron reading posted near the Chesapeake golf course as of last spring – 905 parts per billion.

The EPA’s “removal action level” for boron in drinking water is 900 parts per billion .

Those familiar with the situations in Indiana and Virginia, however, caution that the contamination under the golf course may be just getting going. The fly ash at the golf course was placed there between 2002 and 2007. A sh dumping in Town of Pines began decades ago, by at least the mid-1970s , records show.

An Oct. 7 EPA p ollution r eport about the golf course site found that the boron results “thus far are not indicating a definite pattern.”

Further assistance from an EPA team is being requested to determine the relationship of the boron results to the fly ash.

“I’m concerned about Chesapeake, I really am,” said Nona, who became the driving force behind a grass-roots community organization called People In Need of Environmental Safety, or PINES, which formed after reports surfaced of well contamination .

Members of the Indiana group took their fight to Washington . They pushed for and won support from members of Congress and state representatives.

They applied for and won grants , enabling them to conduct independent water testing that challenged EPA conclusions about the extent of the contamination in their community.

The number of homes that eventually received connections to city water – 270 – was more than double the 130 first ordered.

They were parties to a civil lawsuit against the utility and other firms. The suit was settled and the plaintiffs received some money, though a confidentiality agreement prevented anyone from discussing it in detail.

The extension of city water may offer some relief, but it doesn’t address the problem of future contamination, Nona said.

“It’s just going to seep into your groundwater and go wherever your aquifers take it,” she said.

The dispute started eight years ago. In the spring of 2000, Phyllis DaMota bought a small, comfortable two-story home on Walnut Street.

She didn’t know it, but her house sits about a quarter-mile north of Yard 520, a roughly 50-acre, state-regulated landfill. Over roughly two decades, 1 million tons of fly ash and other coal-combustion products from Northern Indiana Public Service Co.’s Michigan City and Bailly power plants had been placed there, according to the EPA.

The landfill was active until 2001.

DaMota was troubled by an unusual odor that seemed to come from the tap water, which came from a well.

“It smelled like walking into a hair salon,” she said.

She called the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. State officials responded promptly and tested her water; they quickly found high levels of benzene, which can cause cancer . Testing of other homes in the area soon found high levels of arsenic, lead and manganese.

DaMota’s call to the state triggered a series of events that included more extensive testing , eventual extension of city water to her home and many others, and Superfund status for the town.

Public records and news clips, however, show that fly ash, the landfill and questions about water quality had been on the radar screen of the EPA, local officials and town residents for decades.

In January 2003, the EPA signed a consent order with Northern Indiana Public Service Co. and three other companies, including the owner of the landfill and a trucking firm.

The 2003 order specifically states that the firms’ participation “shall not constitute an admission of liability.”

Officially designated “potentially responsible parties,” the firms paid $1.8 million that year to extend Michigan City water lines to 130 homes in Town of Pines, according to utility officials.

After independent test s paid for by the community group showed that contamination was wider than first thought, EPA amended the order to require the companies to extend city water to another 140 homes.

The total cost was $3.6 million, according to utility officials, who declined to comment on any other costs incurred, such as legal expenses, or whether any of the costs were covered by insurance.

In September, Dominion Virginia Power – the source of the 1.5 million tons of ash used to build the golf course – committed to paying up to $6 million to bring city water to affected residences in Chesapeake .

Debbie Loyd keeps a small Canada Dry bottle filled with a final sampling of water from her well. The date “11/26/05” is scrawled on the bottle cap – the date her well was sealed.

When the bottle is shaken slightly, the water turns black, thick with charcoal-colored flakes.

“It’s not a fix-it for the contamination,” Loyd said of the city-water extension. “They have not even begun to start to fix it.”

Loyd and other residents are now focused on the latest phase of the Town of Pines case – a “remedial investigation” of the area ordered by the EPA.

Town residents say fly ash was dumped not only in the nearby landfill, but all over the town as roadbed material and as fill for swampy areas.

Northern Indiana Public Service Co. is still looking into the scale and scope of fly-ash dumping decades ago in Town of Pines.

“We’re going about that process, to investigate those claims right now,” said Dan Sullivan, a utility engineer. “That’s part of what’s ongoing and still has a lot of work to go.”

An EPA update on the site, released in June, reported that coal-combustion products “were hauled from the generating plant to the Town of Pines area and were used as roadbed and fill for driveways and residential yards.”

Not every resident in the area was offered a city-water hook up .

Peggy Richardson and her family have lived in their home just outside Town of Pines since 1976.

EPA testing of their well in 2003 found boron at 1,950 parts per billion.

When Richardson turns on her kitchen tap, a faint scent of sulfur hangs in the air.

Though she and her family use their well water to clean dishes and for bathing, they rely on a dozen 5-gallon bottles of water, delivered every two weeks, for everything else.

It’s paid for by the “potentially responsible parties.”

Her county assessment has remained unchanged since 2002 – fixed at $75,000.

Gordon Tharp, 66, spent 24 years working for U.S. Steel in Gary, Ind. He lives just across the railroad tracks from Richardson’s home and now is connected to city water.

“Just because they have monitoring wells in a place doesn’t mean they’re going to do anything if the readings are bad,” he said.

Asked what advice, if any, he might offer to Chesapeake residents living near the golf course, Tharp was blunt.

“Tell them the squeaky wheel gets the grease,” he said. “If they don’t squeak loud enough and long enough, they won’t get the grease.”

Robert McCabe, (757) 222-5217, robert.mccabe@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules. Comments do not reflect the views or approval of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language. Due to high volume, comments might not appear immediately on the site. We reserve the right to reject any comment for any reason. Readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment to alert an editor. Repeat offenders will be denied automatic posting privileges.

Why do people weigh in on subjects they know nothing about?

A cursory look at the two situations underscores that there is no comparison between the two. It's apples and oranges. The Indiana site was a landfill. Newspaper accounts report that this landfill goes back to the 1970's, prior to regulatory oversight. The Vepco/ golf course fly ash had DEQ oversight and the fly ash was amended with substances to prevent leaching. The Indiana site had no such substances applied to the fly ash.

Moreover, to this day, there has yet to be ANY testing that documents that a problem exists! Until such time that the authorities do find documentable evidence of a problem, this whole issue is pure advocacy journalism -- to put the best face on it. I wonder, when it's all said and done, if the Pilot can be sued for all the lost legal monies wasted and the unnecessary anxiety brought on by this debacle.

Chesapeake Superfund Site 2015

This article points out the future of the Centerville Golf Course site. It is painfully obvious that the toxic products from the fly ash waste disposal site will contaminate the groundwater. The current on site golf course tests have clearly documented groundwater contamination. Even Dominion Power recognizes their liability and has responded. It is a matter of time when the concentrations will elevate and spread through the aquifer. The Indiana site cited foreshadows what the potential contamination levels will be in Chesapeake.

Fly-ash is fly-ash

It doesn't matter if the fly-ash comes from California, Ohio or Virginia or if it is deposited as fill for a golf course or spread around in lots: it STILL contains the same contaminants and those contaminants still reach the groundwater and poison people and wildlife. Like nuclear waste, fly-ash from coal-fired power plants has to be handled properly or else it will be a danger to humans. Like another poster here said: those who don't think it is dangerous should be the first to volunteer to drink water from the wells around the Chesapeake golf course.

Cjack

what you state is true, but I am meaning to point out is that the pollution is the same, that is how these cases are related. But I will concede that the methods of "dumping" or "use" are different in these cases. The car analogy was awesome -- I got a kick out of that one...

Cars

Yes, both cars produce the same pollution

am81430

The 2 sites are related in that they have fly ash. The big difference is how the fly ash was disposed of.
Let me sell you this red car. One is a new Ferrari, one is an old Buick. They are both red cars, so they must be the same?

How Many Coal Burning Plants Does It Take To Enrich Uranium?

How Many Coal Plants Does It Take To Enrich Uranium?

About FIVE coal burning power plants are needed to energize the facility that enriches uranium.

It would be cleaner to simply use the energy from the coal burners to power the cities. Why create another hazardous material in the process?

Ever heard of the LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY?

Accountability of beaurocrats

I agree with Tim. Nancy Welch was sleeping on the job or worse. Nancy Welch should be fired immediately!

@ Jim Foshee

You have an interesting point Jim, but I think you would be more convincing if you posted a picture of yourself drinking a glass of water from the tap of a house by the Battlefield Golf Club.

Thank you for the article...

Mr. McCabe, thank you for constantly updating us on the "Toxic"Golf Course situation. Nothing potentially good can come of the situation (oh my, perhaps the benzene levels will be found not to be quite as high as initially thought...great!). Dumping approx. 1.5 million tons of fly ash for, simply, the PROFIT MOTIVE is utterly reprehensible for all those involved. Why would anyone build their dream golf course on fly ash??????? Do you think Golf Digest is going to do a spread on it????? Why on earth this was approved is beyond me/others. As for the comment of it being safe since it was 'leached' is just a slap in the face to the residents of Chesapeake.

Deadly

The contents of that ash are deadly.

As long as the toxic material is there, people need to be reminded about it.

I think people should not refer it as ASH but as ARSENIC, HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM, and on down the list. The word ASH does not generate as much interest rise from people that referring to ARSENIC etc does.

Your headlines should not use the word ASH.

Fly Sdh srticle

This is just another article from Mr. McCabe to keep this issue before the public. Again Mr. McCabe does not give the true picture. As has been pointed out the Indiana situation and the Chesapeake situation are different. Mr. McCabe is a master at only telling one side of the story. For some reason it is always about the negative. Perhaps Mr. McCabe is not interested in reporting the total truth but just interested in keeeping the pot stirred up. The EPA has tested and we are waiting their reports. Before publishing this infomation regarding Indiana issues he could have waited until reults were in from the EPA testing, but he didn't. How responsible is that? Perhaps Mr. McCabe should present all the facts rather than simply distorted information that fancies him.

Why Was This Article Written?

I'm starting to wonder what the motivation is for the Pilot to continue writing these articles when there are no new developments in the Chesapeaeke situation. I understand making the public aware of issues, but to find this women, out of state, to compare apples and oranges is not newsworthy. As was said below, the fly ash deposits and resulting contamination that took place decades ago cannot be compared to the Chesapeake situation. While the source may be the same, the Chesapeake fly ash was treated so the contaminants do not leach out over time. This was not the case in the 70s. Further, the methods and locations of placement are completely different. I am not defending what was done; I just beg people to stop over-reacting until the evidence is in and has been analyzed. Knee jerk reactions rarely help anything, especially when they are based on misleading information.

Irresponsible and borderline libel?

Look up the terms. If you recall, in July, this quote, "Residents living near the Battlefield Golf Club at Centerville learned Thursday that high levels of arsenic, lead and other contaminants were found in groundwater monitoring wells at the course." Tell me again the definition of libel? And responsible? Apparently, you can compare the two situations, since the SAME PROBLEMS are occurring.

'Clean coal' and 'Clean Nuclear'

So-called 'clean coal' and 'clean nuclear' both have the same inherent problem: hazardous waste products that have to be dealt with. Who knows what the high cost of all this is going to be in human lives and illnesses? But we can't forget that profits come before humans here in America.

Its to early to call Erin Brokovich

I guess these people who live and are coming in contact with the chemicals of this potash from powerplants exhaust systems will have to wait about 10 years to see any health effects befor they have a case for the courts....This story is far from over Just because it does not affect you..it is still story wise and interesting.

IDEA !!!!

Supply Fly-Ash to all Politicians for mud-slinging. That would deplete all the Fly-Ash in the U.S. in a matter of months if not days.........

whew!

Just when I thought the Pilot Might have to shut down for nothing to write about, since this is all over. You figured out a way to keep it going. Good Job!

(DEAD HORSE)
KICK KICK KICK KICK KICK KICK KICK KICK KICK

Not the same

The Indiana site and Chesapeake site are completely different. Indiana dumped flyash on lots, as fill for roads, in low areas, placed on and in the ground water and was not capped. The Chesapeake site capped the flyash and was placed above the groundwater using a binding agent. To imply the 2 are the same is irresponsible and borderline libel.

disposal

Maybe they can give the fly ash to concrete companies to mix in with the concrete that they use to build roads, foundations, etc. This would embed it in there and probably make it safe. There are plenty of public water lines made out of concrete with asbestos still in use that pose no danger.

Oh Well.

Where ever used in such manner, problems arise. Isn't this enough of a reason to find an acceptable alternate use for the by-product of energy production? Smart folks are out there and may have alternate solutions, but utilities seek the path of least resistance and regulatory oversight. Too bad for the folks directly involved and those that may eventually receive the contaminated flows of ground and surface waters from poorly conceived reuse projects. In the raw state, a known and troublesome pollutant. When defined by regulations as a beneficial material for reuse - better than sliced bread fresh from the oven. Yum-yum.

Nuff said.

FLY ASH

All of the city managers and the city council of Chesapeake, Va that voted to allow this Golf Course to be filled and built on this Fly Ash should be relieved of their duties, and told to find another job. A job that will not hurt the people or the environment.


More Stories Like This

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox