64°
forecast

Obama leads cash battle in Virginia and region

Posted to: Elections News Politics Virginia

There’s little surprise that Republican presidential nominee John McCain has raised more money in Hampton Roads from the military and defense communities than Democratic contender Barack Obama.

Some political observers were surprised, however, to learn that Obama has raised more money in Hampton Roads from the medical community than from any other occupation.

According to a Virginian-Pilot study of campaign finance reports, Obama had raised nearly $500,000 in Hampton Roads through August, compared with McCain’s $363,000.

The most contributions for each campaign came from retirees. After that, nearly 12 percent of all donations to Obama came from individuals in the medical community . For McCain, nearly 20 percent of his Hampton Roads donations came from the military/defense community , The Pilot’s analysis found.

“Actually, I think that’s quite interesting. I don’t usually find my colleagues to be particularly political,” said Dr. Theresa Whibley , a staunch Democrat and Norfolk city councilwoman who gave Obama $250.

Even the Obama camp was surprised by the findings.

“That’s fascinating,” said Dr. Irwin Redlener, Obama’s senior health policy adviser and professor of public health at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health.

“Traditionally, doctors are dominantly Republican-leaning, for a whole variety of reasons,” he said.

Officials with the McCain campaign declined to make available any policy advisers for interviews for this story.

The Obama campaign has specifically targeted the medical community, forming a committee, Doctors for Obama, http://doctorsforobama.net/, which Redlener co-chairs.

“Most projections I have seen suggest that McCain’s plan would lead employers to drop millions of people from health insurance. Perhaps the medical field does not relish that prospect,” said Jesse Richman, an assistant professor of political science at Old Dominion University.

There may be other reasons. The difference may not stem from the candidates’ philosophies on health care coverage but their opposing views on medical malpractice insurance.

Obama favors capping malpractice insurance rates on the theory that it will help bring down health care costs. McCain’s platform does not mention malpractice caps but instead argues for a law restricting frivolous medical lawsuits.

“Maybe that’s one of the biggest motives,” Whibley said of Obama’s malpractice cap plan. “I’m hopeful this is beyond that.”

Nationally, as of the end of August, Obama had received nearly $10 million from health care industry contributors, nearly twice what McCain received.

In what will likely be the nation’s first billion-dollar presidential campaign , money has been flowing into both tickets at unprecedented rates, according to the Federal Election Commission.

Through August, the FEC reported that Obama had taken in $454 million, largely from individual donors. McCain had raised $210 million by then, but McCain had agreed to accept public, or taxpayer, financing for his run for the White House. That means he has had to stop accepting individual donations as of the September GOP convention’s conclusion . Obama, who declined public financing, does not have to adhere to that restriction.

Obama had raised a little more than $8.1 million in Virginia; McCain took in nearly $5 million, according to the August filings.

In Hampton Roads, Obama has out- raised McCain by more than $130,000, according to The Pilot’s analysis.

Nationally, Obama’s top donors, as a group, were members of the legal community, followed closely by retirees. McCain’s leading donor group was retirees, followed in a distant second by the legal community.

The McCain camp remains optimistic about its support in Hampton Roads, especially among the military/defense community.

“John McCain has received enormous support from military families and the veteran community in Virginia because he has the experience, judgment and character to lead as commander in chief from day one,” McCain spokeswoman Gail Gitcho said in an e-mail.

The Obama campaign has relied on grass-roots fundraising, declining money from lobbyists or special interest groups.

 

Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343,tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

More for STLCougar and Ira

Frankly, basing one's voting decision on what homicidal maniacs/terrorists state is rediculous, but that was the point of Cougar's post. Cougar compounds the rediculousness by missing the point that AQ/Taliban would surely prefer that the U.S.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081022/ap_on_el_pr/al_qaida_us_election_2

"This requires presence of an impetuous American leader such as McCain, who pledged to continue the war till the last American soldier," the message said. "Then, al-Qaida will have to support McCain in the coming elections so that he continues the failing march of his predecessor, Bush."

Al-Qaida supporters suggested in a Web site message this week they would welcome a pre-election terror attack on the U.S. as a way to usher in a McCain presidency. The message... said if al-Qaida wants to exhaust the US militarily and economically, "impetuous" Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain is the better choice because he is more likely to continue the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"This requires presence of an impetuous American leader such as McCain, who pledged to continue the war till the last American soldier," the message said. "Then

COMPARING VOTES ON VETERANS ISSUES

During the same time span, Obama’s votes are by far more pro-Veteran then McCain’s. I watched the Senate floor on C-Span daily since my return to the US after 9/11. I don't care how we’re paying for it, this country made a commitment to our troops the day they were sent to war. Unlike in Vietnam, we knew the Powell Doctrine. This time around, we are going to take care of our Veterans when they come home.

I don’t expect Palin to understand the meaning of transformational leadership. She should have known though that our soldiers come from both blue states and red states, that my brothers and sisters watched the National Anthem by Whitney Houston while we were in war in Iraq in 1991, and how proud we were to see the support of ALL Americans. If she wants to see anti-American, Gov. Palin should visit Europe, where our soldiers’ graves were disrespected during the 60th anniversary of D-Day.

I think the fact that europe

I think the fact that europe as well as parts of the middle east support Obama as a plus for him. The implication the radical right is trying to make concerning international support for Obama is typical fear and smear. It seems many "real americans" are learning to ignore that sort of static.

Correction

Found a better source, the Library of Congress (http://thomas.loc.gov/).

In the 110th congress (2007-2008) Obama has sponsored 130 bills, McCain has sponsored 38.

Honestly Ira

www.govtrack.us

Obama has authored 121 bills since 2005

Mccain has authored 473 bills since 1993*

Considering the time scales (in this case McCain's record is 4x longer than Obama's), they're running about the same yearly rate. Note though that McCain has authored 22 bills in 2007-2008, Obama has authored 71. Again, decide for yourself if any of his authored bills classify as significant, but the point still remains that he has been a very active senator.

*the website only goes back to 1993. I'm fully aware that McCain has been in the senate longer than that.

Conspiracy Theorist Ira

A newsflash for ya - The Chicago Trib has NEVER endorsed a Dem presidential candidate in its history, until now. Thinking you've stumbled across some "revealing" bit of info is comical.

For most of its history, the Tribune's editorial pages carried a reputation as Republican-leaning, particularly under its late editor/publisher, Col. Robert R. McCormick. The paper consistently endorsed the GOP pres contender, with the exception of its 1872 backing of independent Horace Greeley & its 1912 endorsement of Progressive Party candidate Theodore Roosevelt.

The Trib stated that McCain "failed in his most important executive decision" by naming Palin as his running mate. Regardless of your opinion, this view is widely held.

And.... "Obama introduced 2 initiatives bearing his name: Lugar–Obama, which expanded the Nunn–Lugar cooperative threat reduction concept to conventional weapons,[60] & the Coburn–Obama Transparency Act, which authorized the establishment of USAspending.gov, a web search engine on federal spending.[61]"

Ethan

Will all respect, many would say that by staying home on election day you're simply copping out and letting others make your decisions.

Both presidential candidates are decent men. They both believe they're doing what's best for the nation. But their approaches are clearly different to anyone who cares to pay attention. If you want to think they're the puppets of bankers, go ahead. But if you've done time in Washington you'd figure out that banks are more scared of what a president can do than anything else.

Your right to vote is something many people around the world envy beyond anything else you might have. Please don't waste it.

Attention/attencion

The "Senior Producer" for this very website was previously employed at the The Chicago Tribune. Anyone suprised? This is the person who is directly responsible for what is deemed to be an acceptable post. Stay tuned for more.

Let's all give TR some applause for pointing out the middle east and other foreign regions support Obama. That should should change the race aye? Notice he cannot comment on the link I provided.

Sorry STLCouger

That dog dont hunt. Anti-terrorism expert Richard Clarke weighed in on that point on Oct 2, 2008: "Even more likely is the possibility that al Qaeda would hope the attack would benefit John McCain. Opinion polls, which, as noted above, al Qaeda reads closely, suggest that an attack would help McCain. Polls in Europe and the Middle East also suggest an overwhelming popular support there for Barack Obama. Al Qaeda would not like it if there were a popular American president again."

AQ and the Taliban would want the US admin to continue ignoring Afghanistan and the Pak tribal areas. By definition they are endoring the McCain/Palin "stuck in Iraq / muddle thru in Afghanistan" campaign. AQ wanted the U.S. to invade Iraq with the hope that it would inflame radicalism and get the US bogged down. Mission Akomplished.

Honestly MP

He did not author those bills. The vast majority were co-sponsored. That just means you were on board to bring it to the floor. It is a meaningless number regardless of the politician you try to attribute it to. Obama has authored NO legislation that I am aware of. I have pasted a link that shows his entire voting record. McCain and Biden's can be found at this same site.

http://www.senate.gov

I understand that many of Obama's supporters feel they do not have a chance of winning w/o the use of mmisinformation and propaganda, but the link is an unbiased and complete record of all our senators votes. Note that McCain's entire record does not appear because it is too lenghty.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Elections rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners